Main trade-off
TerraMaster F2-424
Two bays cannot use RAID 5 or RAID 6.
Head-to-head
The F2-424 supplies an N95 processor, 8GB RAM and dual 2.5GbE ports. The F2-425 Plus N150 keeps the two-drive format while adding dual 5GbE and a third M.2 slot.
Before you choose
TerraMaster F2-424 gives 12TB and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.
What this is based on
Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.
Main trade-off
Two bays cannot use RAID 5 or RAID 6.
Main trade-off
The three M.2 slots do not turn the two SATA bays into a four-drive hard-disk array.


Compare F2-424 and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB by protected storage, included networking and the exact SSD or application layout you need.
Use the Plus for a faster network and an extra SSD slot.
Winner by situation
Using RAID 1 for two disks or RAID 5 for three or more disks, TerraMaster F2-424 gives 12TB and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.
Included port rates are 2.5GbE and 5GbE. Use the 100GB calculation alongside the actual client speed.
TerraMaster F2-424 supplies 8 GB RAM and supports 32 GB. TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB supplies 8 GB and supports 32 GB. Compare the stated application memory requirement with the supplied configuration before budgeting for an upgrade. RAM capacity alone does not establish application speed.
A mirror made from two M.2 SSDs fills every onboard position in the F2-424. The F2-425 Plus has one position left for a separately supported role, which can matter more than its processor-generation change.
What matters in practice
TerraMaster F2-424 gives 12TB and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.
Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.
The line-rate lower bound is 320 seconds for TerraMaster F2-424 and 160 seconds for F2-425 Plus N150 8GB. Real copies take longer. A 1GbE client makes the lower bound 800 seconds for both.
Decimal 100GB × 8 = 800 gigabits. Divide 800 by the fastest included port rate, 2.5Gbps or 5Gbps. Ignore protocol overhead only for this lower-bound calculation. Optional adapters and aggregated ports are excluded.
A mirror made from two M.2 SSDs fills every onboard position in the F2-424. The F2-425 Plus has one position left for a separately supported role, which can matter more than its processor-generation change.
F2-424: 2 slots minus 2 SSDs = 0 remaining. F2-425 Plus: 3 minus 2 = 1 remaining. Confirm pool support, cache restrictions and lane sharing for the actual workload.

TerraMaster, F2-424
The chassis has 2-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

TerraMaster, F2-425 Plus N150 8GB
A compact hybrid NAS with two SATA bays, three M.2 slots and two 5GbE ports. It suits a small SSD workspace beside a bulk-storage mirror.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | TerraMaster F2-424 | TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fastest included Ethernet port | 2.5GbE | 5GbE | The client, switch and storage must keep up before this port rate helps a transfer. |
| M.2 storage slots | 2 | 3 | Plan SSD cache and storage pools separately from the SATA archive. |
| Processor | Intel N95 | Intel N150 | Media engines, application architecture and concurrency depend on this platform. |
| M.2 position after a two-SSD mirror | No onboard M.2 position remains | One onboard M.2 position remains | A third SSD role can fit without consuming the SATA mirror bays, subject to supported pool layouts. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose TerraMaster F2-424. F2-424 already has dual 2.5 GbE, two M.2 slots and a 32 GB memory ceiling. Its two SATA bays provide the same mirrored hard-drive capacity.
Choose TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB. F2-425 Plus adds 5 GbE and a third M.2 position. After two M.2 SSDs form a supported mirror, one onboard M.2 position remains.
What matters in practice
The F2-424 supplies an N95 processor, 8GB RAM and dual 2.5GbE ports. The F2-425 Plus N150 keeps the two-drive format while adding dual 5GbE and a third M.2 slot.
Both officially support 32GB memory and a two-drive SATA mirror. Those limits remain shared, so the decision should follow network equipment and the planned M.2 layout.
A third M.2 position matters when two SSDs form a mirror and another storage role is required. Verify SSD compatibility and lane sharing before assuming that three installed devices can all sustain full advertised SSD speed.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
Only 10 of 32 models checked match every need here: “Start with two drives” and “Survive one drive failure”.
10 matching models from 32 checkedMatch countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “Start with two drives” and “Survive one drive failure”. A need with no documented match does not count.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| TerraMaster F2-424 |
|
| |
| TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Dual 2.5GbE and two M.2 slots meet your plan
See price & reviews on Amazon
You need 5GbE and a third M.2 position
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.