Head-to-head

TerraMaster F2-425 vs TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB: Plus adds separate SSD storage around the two-drive archive

The short answer

Choose the F2-425 for SATA backups on a 2.5GbE network. Choose the F2-425 Plus when three M.2 slots or dual 5GbE ports solve a planned workflow.

Before you choose

The reasoning and the trade-offs

Protected capacity with equal 12TB drives

F2-425 gives 12TB and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.

What this is based on

Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.

Main trade-off

TerraMaster F2-425

Two SATA bays leave no room to add a third data drive to the same chassis.

Main trade-off

TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB

The three M.2 slots do not turn the two SATA bays into a four-drive hard-disk array.

TerraMaster F2-425

TerraMaster F2-425

Choose it for
  • You only need two SATA drives and 2.5GbE
  • You want 4GB for supplied ram
Main trade-off
Two SATA bays leave no room to add a third data drive to the same chassis.
See price & reviews on Amazon
TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB

TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB

Choose it for
  • You need a separate SSD pool or a 5GbE client path
  • You want 8GB for supplied ram
Main trade-off
The three M.2 slots do not turn the two SATA bays into a four-drive hard-disk array.
See price & reviews on Amazon

Analysis updated , Catalog updated , Amazon.com / United States

About this comparison

Compare F2-425 and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB by protected storage, included networking and the exact SSD or application layout you need.

The Plus model is worthwhile for an SSD pool and a 5GbE client.

Winner by situation

Start with what you need it to do

  • A protected archive using 12 TB disks in every internal SATA bay

    Using RAID 1 for two disks or RAID 5 for three or more disks, F2-425 gives 12TB and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.

    TerraMaster F2-425
    Similar
    TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB
    Similar
  • A workstation already matching the faster included Ethernet port

    Included port rates are 2.5GbE and 5GbE. Use the 100GB calculation alongside the actual client speed.

    TerraMaster F2-425
    Good
    TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB
    Better fit
  • Several local services sharing the supplied RAM

    TerraMaster F2-425 supplies 4 GB RAM and supports 16 GB. TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB supplies 8 GB and supports 32 GB. Compare the stated application memory requirement with the supplied configuration before budgeting for an upgrade. RAM capacity alone does not establish application speed.

    TerraMaster F2-425
    Depends
    TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB
    Better fit
  • Keep the SATA mirror while adding an internal M.2 SSD mirror

    The F2-425 Plus can allocate two of its three M.2 slots to a mirror and still retain a third M.2 position. The F2-425 cannot host that layout through internal M.2 slots.

    TerraMaster F2-425
    Not suitable
    TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB
    Better fit

What matters in practice

The differences that matter

Protected capacity with equal 12TB drives

F2-425 gives 12TB and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.

How we reached this conclusion

Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.

100GB transfer at the included port ceiling

The line-rate lower bound is 320 seconds for F2-425 and 160 seconds for F2-425 Plus N150 8GB. Real copies take longer. A 1GbE client makes the lower bound 800 seconds for both.

How we reached this conclusion

Decimal 100GB × 8 = 800 gigabits. Divide 800 by the fastest included port rate, 2.5Gbps or 5Gbps. Ignore protocol overhead only for this lower-bound calculation. Optional adapters and aggregated ports are excluded.

The Plus can separate an SSD pool from the hard-drive mirror

The F2-425 Plus can allocate two of its three M.2 slots to a mirror and still retain a third M.2 position. The F2-425 cannot host that layout through internal M.2 slots.

How we reached this conclusion

Three slots minus two mirrored SSDs leaves one. Standard F2-425 has zero M.2 slots. Pool support, SSD compatibility and lane sharing remain configuration checks.

Choice A
TerraMaster F2-425

TerraMaster, F2-425

F2-425

A two-drive photo and backup server with 2.5GbE and 4GB memory. Choose this chassis when a mirrored pair is enough and M.2 storage is unnecessary.

Best matched use
A modest two-drive home archive

Checked facts

  • 2 SATA drive bays and 0 M.2 slots
  • 2.5GbE fastest included network port
  • 4GB supplied RAM, expandable to 16GB
  • Diskless NAS with Intel x86 quad-core processor
Choice B
TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB

TerraMaster, F2-425 Plus N150 8GB

F2-425 Plus N150 8GB

A compact hybrid NAS with two SATA bays, three M.2 slots and two 5GbE ports. It suits a small SSD workspace beside a bulk-storage mirror.

Best matched use
Two hard drives plus a separate SSD workspace

Checked facts

  • 2 SATA drive bays and 3 M.2 slots
  • 5GbE fastest included network port
  • 8GB supplied RAM, expandable to 32GB
  • Diskless NAS with Intel N150 processor

Meaningful differences

What changes the fit

Meaningful differences between TerraMaster F2-425 and TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB
What changesTerraMaster F2-425TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GBWhy it matters
Fastest included Ethernet port2.5GbE5GbEThe client, switch and storage must keep up before this port rate helps a transfer.
Supplied RAM4GB8GBThis is the installed memory budget before purchasing upgrade modules.
Supported RAM ceiling16GB32GBThis sets the manufacturer-supported upgrade ceiling for concurrent services.
M.2 storage slots03Plan SSD cache and storage pools separately from the SATA archive.
ProcessorIntel x86 quad-coreIntel N150Media engines, application architecture and concurrency depend on this platform.

What you give up

Every choice has a cost

If you choose TerraMaster F2-425

  • There are no M.2 slots. Storage drives are purchased separately.

If you choose TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB

  • A client and switch capable of 5GbE are required to use the faster port rate. Drives are sold separately.

Recommendation switch

The decision flips if...

You only need two SATA drives and 2.5GbE

Choose TerraMaster F2-425. F2-425 supports the two-drive SATA mirror at the same protected capacity as the Plus. Its 2.5 GbE link needs a compatible client to exceed gigabit speeds.

You need a separate SSD pool or a 5GbE client path

Choose TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB. F2-425 Plus adds three M.2 positions and 5 GbE. Verify the SSD pool role and the complete client-to-switch path before counting on either benefit.

What matters in practice

How to make the call

01

Start with the required storage layout

Choose the F2-425 for SATA backups on a 2.5GbE network. Choose the F2-425 Plus when three M.2 slots or dual 5GbE ports solve a planned workflow.

02

Work through the drive budget

Two SATA drives give both models the same mirrored capacity. The Plus gains storage flexibility through separate M.2 slots rather than additional hard-drive bays.

03

Check the actual client and application plan

On a 1GbE router both models negotiate the slower link. Price the client adapter and switch before treating the Plus model as a transfer-speed upgrade.

Check these before buying

  • Confirm the selected diskless model and supplied RAM against the exact listing.
  • Check the manufacturer compatibility list for every drive and memory module.
  • Price a separate backup and the required client adapter or switch.

What this comparison cannot tell you

  • Capacity examples use equal 12TB drives before formatting, snapshots and filesystem overhead.
  • Ethernet calculations are lower bounds. Disk performance, network protocol and other traffic add time.
  • Memory capacity does not certify application speed or a VM count.

What the facts say

What the comparison shows

Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.

Compared set

Only 10 of 32 models checked match every need here: “Start with two drives” and “Survive one drive failure”.

10 matching models from 32 checked
See the checked facts and calculation notes
Compared set
32 models
Source records
4 for the products shown
Catalog updated

Match countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “Start with two drives” and “Survive one drive failure”. A need with no documented match does not count.

Facts and source records used for the products in this recommendation
ProductNeeds matchedChecked factsSource records
TerraMaster F2-425
  • Start with two drives
  • Survive one drive failure
  • 2 SATA drive bays and 0 M.2 slots
  • 2.5GbE fastest included network port
  • 4GB supplied RAM, expandable to 16GB
TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB
  • Start with two drives
  • Survive one drive failure
  • 2 SATA drive bays and 3 M.2 slots
  • 5GbE fastest included network port
  • 8GB supplied RAM, expandable to 32GB

Ready to choose?

Check the price. Read the owner reviews.

Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Links open in a new tab.