Main trade-off
TerraMaster F2-425
Two SATA bays leave no room to add a third data drive to the same chassis.
Head-to-head
Choose the F2-425 for SATA backups on a 2.5GbE network. Choose the F2-425 Plus when three M.2 slots or dual 5GbE ports solve a planned workflow.
Before you choose
F2-425 gives 12TB and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.
What this is based on
Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.
Main trade-off
Two SATA bays leave no room to add a third data drive to the same chassis.
Main trade-off
The three M.2 slots do not turn the two SATA bays into a four-drive hard-disk array.


Compare F2-425 and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB by protected storage, included networking and the exact SSD or application layout you need.
The Plus model is worthwhile for an SSD pool and a 5GbE client.
Winner by situation
Using RAID 1 for two disks or RAID 5 for three or more disks, F2-425 gives 12TB and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.
Included port rates are 2.5GbE and 5GbE. Use the 100GB calculation alongside the actual client speed.
TerraMaster F2-425 supplies 4 GB RAM and supports 16 GB. TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB supplies 8 GB and supports 32 GB. Compare the stated application memory requirement with the supplied configuration before budgeting for an upgrade. RAM capacity alone does not establish application speed.
The F2-425 Plus can allocate two of its three M.2 slots to a mirror and still retain a third M.2 position. The F2-425 cannot host that layout through internal M.2 slots.
What matters in practice
F2-425 gives 12TB and F2-425 Plus N150 8GB gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.
Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.
The line-rate lower bound is 320 seconds for F2-425 and 160 seconds for F2-425 Plus N150 8GB. Real copies take longer. A 1GbE client makes the lower bound 800 seconds for both.
Decimal 100GB × 8 = 800 gigabits. Divide 800 by the fastest included port rate, 2.5Gbps or 5Gbps. Ignore protocol overhead only for this lower-bound calculation. Optional adapters and aggregated ports are excluded.
The F2-425 Plus can allocate two of its three M.2 slots to a mirror and still retain a third M.2 position. The F2-425 cannot host that layout through internal M.2 slots.
Three slots minus two mirrored SSDs leaves one. Standard F2-425 has zero M.2 slots. Pool support, SSD compatibility and lane sharing remain configuration checks.

TerraMaster, F2-425
A two-drive photo and backup server with 2.5GbE and 4GB memory. Choose this chassis when a mirrored pair is enough and M.2 storage is unnecessary.

TerraMaster, F2-425 Plus N150 8GB
A compact hybrid NAS with two SATA bays, three M.2 slots and two 5GbE ports. It suits a small SSD workspace beside a bulk-storage mirror.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | TerraMaster F2-425 | TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fastest included Ethernet port | 2.5GbE | 5GbE | The client, switch and storage must keep up before this port rate helps a transfer. |
| Supplied RAM | 4GB | 8GB | This is the installed memory budget before purchasing upgrade modules. |
| Supported RAM ceiling | 16GB | 32GB | This sets the manufacturer-supported upgrade ceiling for concurrent services. |
| M.2 storage slots | 0 | 3 | Plan SSD cache and storage pools separately from the SATA archive. |
| Processor | Intel x86 quad-core | Intel N150 | Media engines, application architecture and concurrency depend on this platform. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose TerraMaster F2-425. F2-425 supports the two-drive SATA mirror at the same protected capacity as the Plus. Its 2.5 GbE link needs a compatible client to exceed gigabit speeds.
Choose TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB. F2-425 Plus adds three M.2 positions and 5 GbE. Verify the SSD pool role and the complete client-to-switch path before counting on either benefit.
What matters in practice
Choose the F2-425 for SATA backups on a 2.5GbE network. Choose the F2-425 Plus when three M.2 slots or dual 5GbE ports solve a planned workflow.
Two SATA drives give both models the same mirrored capacity. The Plus gains storage flexibility through separate M.2 slots rather than additional hard-drive bays.
On a 1GbE router both models negotiate the slower link. Price the client adapter and switch before treating the Plus model as a transfer-speed upgrade.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
Only 10 of 32 models checked match every need here: “Start with two drives” and “Survive one drive failure”.
10 matching models from 32 checkedMatch countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “Start with two drives” and “Survive one drive failure”. A need with no documented match does not count.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| TerraMaster F2-425 |
|
|
|
| TerraMaster F2-425 Plus N150 8GB |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

You only need two SATA drives and 2.5GbE
See price & reviews on Amazon
You need a separate SSD pool or a 5GbE client path
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.