Main trade-off
HP 3101sdw
No fax and no automatic double-sided scanning.
Head-to-head
HP 3101sdw vs Canon MF462dw II: Canon automates the backs of scanned forms
The short answer
Choose the MF462dw II for automatic two-sided scanning and heavier monthly printing. The 3101sdw is sufficient for a lighter office scanning one-sided paperwork, if its purchase price is more attractive.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
The scanner is a bigger upgrade than two extra ppm
The 35-to-37-ppm print difference is small. Capturing both sides of forms without turning them is a more substantial workflow change for an office receiving double-sided originals.
What this is based on
HP 35 ppm and simplex ADF. Canon 37 ppm and single pass duplex ADF.
Main trade-off
Canon MF462dw II
A color scan does not mean this printer can print in color.
HP 3101sdw
- Choose it for
- Most scan originals are one-sided
- Monthly printing stays below 2,500 pages
- Main trade-off
- No fax and no automatic double-sided scanning.
Canon MF462dw II
- Choose it for
- You scan both sides of forms
- A separate 100-sheet multipurpose tray is useful
- Main trade-off
- A color scan does not mean this printer can print in color.
About this comparison
Compare two-sided scanning, a second paper tray and recommended monthly volume. See when the Canon upgrade saves work beyond a small speed gain.
Choose the MF462dw II for automatic two-sided scanning and heavier monthly printing. The 3101sdw is sufficient for a lighter office scanning one-sided paperwork, if its purchase price is more attractive.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
Two-sided signed forms every week
Canon captures both faces automatically.
- HP 3101sdw
- Caution
- Canon MF462dw II
- Better fit
One-sided invoice stacks under 50 sheets
Both have 50-sheet feeders.
- HP 3101sdw
- Good
- Canon MF462dw II
- Good
Three thousand pages each month
Canon recommended volume covers this.
- HP 3101sdw
- Caution
- Canon MF462dw II
- Better fit
Light office printing and occasional scans
The simpler workflow does not require Canon’s main upgrade.
- HP 3101sdw
- Good
- Canon MF462dw II
- Good
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
The scanner is a bigger upgrade than two extra ppm
The 35-to-37-ppm print difference is small. Capturing both sides of forms without turning them is a more substantial workflow change for an office receiving double-sided originals.
How we reached this conclusion
HP 35 ppm and simplex ADF. Canon 37 ppm and single pass duplex ADF.
Three thousand pages crosses the recommended workload boundary
That recurring volume exceeds HP’s 2,500-page recommendation while remaining inside Canon’s 4,000-page upper recommendation. This is about regular use, not a hard stop at the published number.
How we reached this conclusion
Recommended monthly ceilings 2500 and 4000.
A second paper stock can stay separate on Canon
Canon combines a 250-sheet cassette with a 100-sheet multipurpose tray. HP’s 250-sheet input does not provide the same separate bulk feed, which matters when letterhead and plain paper alternate.
How we reached this conclusion
Canon 250+100 input versus HP 250 input.
Choice A
HP, 3101sdw
3101sdw
Everyday black-and-white reports and single-sided scan stacks.
- Best matched use
- Most scan originals are one-sided
Checked facts
- Automatic two-sided scanning: No
- Standard paper input: 250 sheets
- Recommended monthly ceiling: 2,500 pages
- Letter output: Up to 35 ppm
Choice B
Canon, MF462dw II
MF462dw II
Two-sided forms and everyday black-and-white office printing.
- Best matched use
- You scan both sides of forms
Checked facts
- Automatic two-sided scanning: Single-pass duplex
- Standard paper input: 350 sheets
- Recommended monthly ceiling: 4,000 pages
- Letter output: Up to 37 ppm
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | HP 3101sdw | Canon MF462dw II | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automatic two-sided scanning | No | Single-pass duplex | Canon removes the manual return pass for supported originals. |
| Standard paper input | 250 sheets | 350 sheets | Canon adds a separate 100-sheet multipurpose tray. |
| Recommended monthly ceiling | 2,500 pages | 4,000 pages | Use this for regular workloads rather than maximum duty cycle. |
| Letter output | Up to 35 ppm | Up to 37 ppm | The small rate difference is secondary to scanning and paper handling. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose HP 3101sdw
- HP restricts cartridges using non-HP chips or circuitry, so check compatibility before buying replacement toner.
If you choose Canon MF462dw II
- Recurring workloads above 4,000 pages a month exceed Canon’s recommended range.
Recommendation switch
The decision flips if...
Double-sided scanning is routine
Choose Canon MF462dw II. Canon removes the manual reversal.
Your originals are one-sided and volume is moderate
Choose HP 3101sdw. HP meets that brief if priced advantageously.
You need printed color charts
Choose neither. Both produce monochrome output only.
What matters in practice
How to make the call
Follow the incoming documents
If customers send two-sided paperwork, the Canon has an advantage regardless of monthly printing. If every original is one-sided, both feeders can automate the stack. The right scanner is determined by the originals, not the number of pages you print.
Separate volume guidance from durability headlines
A maximum duty cycle describes a different limit from the recommended monthly range. Use the recommendation for the normal workload you expect to repeat, especially around 3000 pages a month.
A second tray can reduce paper swapping
Canon’s 100-sheet multipurpose tray lets you keep a supported alternate stock ready. Check the paper size and weight rules for that tray. The specification does not mean every envelope, label or thick card can be loaded in a full stack.
Check cartridge compatibility before ordering spares
HP describes dynamic security and restrictions on cartridges with non-HP chips or circuitry. That is a different rule from an HP+ e-model requiring original HP toner for life. This comparison uses the exact 3101sdw, not an e-suffix subscription variant.
What this comparison cannot tell you
- Rated print speeds are manufacturer figures, not matched hands-on tests.
- Toner yields use standardized test documents and vary with content.
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current laser printers comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
See the checked facts and calculation notes
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| HP 3101sdw |
|
|
|
| Canon MF462dw II |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
HP 3101sdw
Most scan originals are one-sided
See price & reviews on AmazonCanon MF462dw II
You scan both sides of forms
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.