Head-to-head

Thule Pulse 2 M vs L: L fits skis above 155 cm, M eases tight hatch-clearance planning

The short answer

Choose Pulse 2 L for skis beyond 155 cm or broader family packing. Choose M when short gear and compact luggage fit, especially if hatch clearance is limited.

Before you choose

The reasoning and the trade-offs

Volume grows faster than empty weight

L adds 14.3% nominal capacity for a 4.3-pound increase.

What this is based on

(16 - 14) / 14 × 100 = 14.3%. 35.3 - 31 = 4.3 pounds.

Main trade-off

Thule Pulse 2 M

It cannot take ordinary adult-length skis above 155 cm.

Main trade-off

Thule Pulse 2 L

The 175 cm ski limit is short for many adult skis.

Thule Pulse 2 M

Thule Pulse 2 M

Choose it for
  • Your compact luggage fits 14 cubic feet
  • Your hatchback favors a shorter shell
Main trade-off
It cannot take ordinary adult-length skis above 155 cm.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Thule Pulse 2 L

Thule Pulse 2 L

Choose it for
  • You carry skis from 156 to 175 cm
  • Your load needs more horizontal space
Main trade-off
The 175 cm ski limit is short for many adult skis.
See price & reviews on Amazon

Analysis updated , Catalog updated , Amazon.com / United States

About this comparison

Compare Pulse 2 M and L by luggage volume, ski length, shell weight and the roof length needed to gain two extra cubic feet.

Winner by situation

Start with what you need it to do

  • Your compact luggage fits 14 cubic feet

    M provides 14 cubic feet with 4.3 pounds less empty weight. L adds two cubic feet.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Better fit
    Thule Pulse 2 L
    Good
  • Your skis are longer than 155 cm and no longer than 175 cm

    M stops at 155 cm. L extends the published ski allowance by 20 cm.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Not suitable
    Thule Pulse 2 L
    Better fit
  • Your hatchback favors a shorter shell

    M is 7.8 inches shorter outside. A shorter shell still needs a real hatch-clearance check.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Better fit
    Thule Pulse 2 L
    Good
  • Your skis are longer than 175 cm and no longer than 180 cm

    Motion 3 L lists a 180 cm maximum. Neither compared Pulse size meets this requirement.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Not suitable
    Thule Pulse 2 L
    Not suitable

What matters in practice

The differences that matter

Volume grows faster than empty weight

L adds 14.3% nominal capacity for a 4.3-pound increase.

How we reached this conclusion

(16 - 14) / 14 × 100 = 14.3%. 35.3 - 31 = 4.3 pounds.

A longer box can actually be lower

The L exterior is 7.8 inches longer and one inch lower.

How we reached this conclusion

76.7 - 68.9 = 7.8 inches. 16.6 - 15.6 = 1 inch.

Adult ski fit changes at 155 cm

L adds 20 cm of maximum ski length.

How we reached this conclusion

175 - 155 = 20 cm.

Choice A
Thule Pulse 2 M

Thule, Pulse 2 M

Thule Pulse 2 M

The box holds 14 cubic feet. It accepts gear up to 155 centimeters long.

Best matched use
keep the rear hatch clear and work with a shorter roof

Checked facts

  • The box holds 14 cubic feet.
  • It accepts gear up to 155 centimeters long.
  • The box uses dualside access.
  • Its published exterior size is 68.9 x 32.1 x 16.6 inches.
Choice B
Thule Pulse 2 L

Thule, Pulse 2 L

Thule Pulse 2 L

The box holds 16 cubic feet. It accepts gear up to 175 centimeters long.

Best matched use
carry skis without folding the seats and keep the rear hatch clear

Checked facts

  • The box holds 16 cubic feet.
  • It accepts gear up to 175 centimeters long.
  • The box uses dualside access.
  • Its published exterior size is 76.7 x 33.2 x 15.6 inches.

Meaningful differences

What changes the fit

Meaningful differences between Thule Pulse 2 M and Thule Pulse 2 L
What changesThule Pulse 2 MThule Pulse 2 LWhy it matters
Cargo volume14 cu ft16 cu ftCompare the space needed by bags after checking their individual dimensions.
Maximum ski length155 cm175 cmA ski longer than this documented limit needs a different carrier.
Exterior length68.9 in76.7 inCheck roof placement, hatch movement and storage space for the shell.
Exterior height16.6 in15.6 inOverall shell height helps compare bulk but cannot establish installed garage clearance.
Empty box weight31 lb35.3 lbSubtract the shell and rack from the vehicle roof limit before allocating cargo.

What you give up

Every choice has a cost

If you choose Thule Pulse 2 M

  • Fourteen cubic feet fills quickly with four travelers' luggage.

If you choose Thule Pulse 2 L

  • Central locking is simpler than Motion's SlideLock feedback system.

Recommendation switch

The decision flips if...

Your skis are 176 to 180 cm and the same 16-cubic-foot capacity is enough

Choose neither. Motion 3 L lists 180 cm skis in a similarly compact overall footprint.

What matters in practice

How to make the call

01

Volume grows faster than empty weight

This is a plausible upgrade for lightweight holiday luggage. The gain is mainly a longer interior, so lay out the bags and check their total length before expecting the L to solve a height problem.

02

A longer box can actually be lower

A larger size label does not imply more overhead obstruction. The L can be the better vertical fit while asking for more roof length. Confirm the published hatch boundary and the permitted crossbar position rather than deciding from roof height alone.

03

Adult ski fit changes at 155 cm

A 170 cm pair is outside the M guidance and inside the L guidance. This is a stronger reason to size up than a vague desire for future flexibility. Longer skis still need a different carrier even if the luggage volume would otherwise be enough.

Check these before buying

  • Measure your longest and tallest cargo before choosing the shell.
  • Check the exact vehicle and crossbar fit guide, then weigh the rack, empty box and luggage together.

What this comparison cannot tell you

  • Cargo dimensions and manufacturer load ratings cannot predict wind noise, fuel use or how a particular bag packs around mounting hardware.

What the facts say

What the comparison shows

Useful conclusions from the current roof cargo boxes comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.

Compared set

18 of 26 models checked match every need here: “Carry camping gear” and “Open it from either side”.

18 matching models from 26 checked

Measured difference

Thule Pulse 2 L lists 16 cu ft for published cargo volume, 14% above Thule Pulse 2 M at 14 cu ft.

Thule Pulse 2 M
14 cu ft
Thule Pulse 2 L
16 cu ft
Comparable models
20 of 26
See the checked facts and calculation notes
Compared set
26 models
Source records
2 for the products shown
Catalog updated

Match countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “Carry camping gear” and “Open it from either side”. A need with no documented match does not count.

Calculation noteThis compares published exterior-category volume. Shape, mounting hardware and long gear can reduce practical packing space. 20 of 26 models have comparable published figures for context.

Facts and source records used for the products in this recommendation
ProductNeeds matchedChecked factsSource records
Thule Pulse 2 M
  • Carry camping gear
  • Open it from either side
  • The box holds 14 cubic feet.
  • It accepts gear up to 155 centimeters long.
  • The box uses dualside access.
Thule Pulse 2 L
  • Carry camping gear
  • Open it from either side
  • The box holds 16 cubic feet.
  • It accepts gear up to 175 centimeters long.
  • The box uses dualside access.

Ready to choose?

Check the price. Read the owner reviews.

Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Links open in a new tab.