Head-to-head

Thule Pulse 2 M vs Force 3 M: Force adds six pounds for SlideLock, both stop at 155 cm skis

The short answer

Choose Pulse 2 M for a lighter occasional-use box. Choose Force 3 M for SlideLock if that handling detail matters more than the six-pound increase. Both stop at 155 cm skis.

Before you choose

The reasoning and the trade-offs

The six-pound saving is sizeable here

Pulse 2 M weighs 31 pounds against 37 for Force 3 M.

What this is based on

37 - 31 = 6 pounds. 6 / 37 × 100 = 16.2% less empty weight.

Main trade-off

Thule Pulse 2 M

It cannot take ordinary adult-length skis above 155 cm.

Main trade-off

Thule Force 3 M

Its 155 cm ski limit excludes most adult skis.

Thule Pulse 2 M

Thule Pulse 2 M

Choose it for
  • You remove the carrier after occasional holidays
  • Your small car has limited roof-load allowance
Main trade-off
It cannot take ordinary adult-length skis above 155 cm.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Thule Force 3 M

Thule Force 3 M

Choose it for
  • You want the Force SlideLock mechanism
  • A small difference in interior width does not affect your bags
Main trade-off
Its 155 cm ski limit excludes most adult skis.
See price & reviews on Amazon

Analysis updated , Catalog updated , Amazon.com / United States

About this comparison

Compare Pulse 2 M and Force 3 M by handling weight, overhead height, usable interior and locking at their shared 14-cubic-foot capacity.

Winner by situation

Start with what you need it to do

  • You remove the carrier after occasional holidays

    Pulse 2 M weighs 31 pounds against 37 pounds for Force 3 M.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Better fit
    Thule Force 3 M
    Good
  • You require the Force SlideLock mechanism

    Force provides SlideLock while Pulse uses a central locking system.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Not suitable
    Thule Force 3 M
    Better fit
  • Your small car has limited roof-load allowance

    Pulse consumes six fewer pounds of the roof-load allowance before cargo. The total must still remain within every vehicle and rack limit.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Better fit
    Thule Force 3 M
    Good
  • Your skis are longer than 155 cm and no longer than 175 cm

    Both M sizes stop at 155 cm. Pulse 2 L extends the allowance to 175 cm.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Not suitable
    Thule Force 3 M
    Not suitable

What matters in practice

The differences that matter

The six-pound saving is sizeable here

Pulse 2 M weighs 31 pounds against 37 for Force 3 M.

How we reached this conclusion

37 - 31 = 6 pounds. 6 / 37 × 100 = 16.2% less empty weight.

The lower shell still has a tall interior

Pulse is 0.8 inches lower outside yet has 0.2 inches more published internal height.

How we reached this conclusion

17.4 - 16.6 = 0.8 inches outside. 15.3 - 15.1 = 0.2 inches inside.

The ski ceiling does not change with trim

Both M sizes list 155 cm, excluding a 165 cm ski by ten centimeters.

How we reached this conclusion

165 - 155 = 10 cm beyond both published ski limits.

Choice A
Thule Pulse 2 M

Thule, Pulse 2 M

Thule Pulse 2 M

The box holds 14 cubic feet. It accepts gear up to 155 centimeters long.

Best matched use
keep the rear hatch clear and work with a shorter roof

Checked facts

  • The box holds 14 cubic feet.
  • It accepts gear up to 155 centimeters long.
  • The box uses dualside access.
  • Its published exterior size is 68.9 x 32.1 x 16.6 inches.
Choice B
Thule Force 3 M

Thule, Force 3 M

Thule Force 3 M

The box holds 14 cubic feet. It accepts gear up to 155 centimeters long.

Best matched use
keep the rear hatch clear and work with a shorter roof

Checked facts

  • The box holds 14 cubic feet.
  • It accepts gear up to 155 centimeters long.
  • The box uses dualside access.
  • Its published exterior size is 69 x 32 x 17.4 inches.

Meaningful differences

What changes the fit

Meaningful differences between Thule Pulse 2 M and Thule Force 3 M
What changesThule Pulse 2 MThule Force 3 MWhy it matters
Empty box weight31 lb37 lbSubtract the shell and rack from the vehicle roof limit before allocating cargo.
Exterior length68.9 in69 inCheck roof placement, hatch movement and storage space for the shell.
Exterior width32.1 in32 inThis consumes crossbar room that might otherwise hold a bike carrier.
Exterior height16.6 in17.4 inOverall shell height helps compare bulk but cannot establish installed garage clearance.
Internal height15.3 in15.1 inThe tallest suitcase or boots must fit beneath the curved lid without forcing it closed.

What you give up

Every choice has a cost

If you choose Thule Pulse 2 M

  • Fourteen cubic feet fills quickly with four travelers' luggage.

If you choose Thule Force 3 M

  • The tall 17.4-inch profile adds more garage height than low-profile boxes.

Recommendation switch

The decision flips if...

Your skis are between 156 and 175 cm

Choose neither. Pulse 2 L extends the documented ski allowance to 175 cm and raises volume to 16 cubic feet.

What matters in practice

How to make the call

01

The six-pound saving is sizeable here

A compact carrier often goes on and off more regularly than a permanent road-trip setup. The lighter shell is useful during removal and leaves six extra pounds for contents under an unchanged vehicle limit.

02

The lower shell still has a tall interior

The numbers illustrate why exterior size cannot be used as a substitute for internal fit. Both interiors remain curved, so a bag close to the published limit needs a real check. Pick the shell around your luggage rather than a taller exterior alone.

03

The ski ceiling does not change with trim

If this box is meant to carry adult skis, verify lengths before choosing between lock systems. Many common alpine skis exceed the M limit. A small shell that fits the car beautifully can still be the wrong shape for the only equipment you intend to carry.

Check these before buying

  • Measure your longest and tallest cargo before choosing the shell.
  • Check the exact vehicle and crossbar fit guide, then weigh the rack, empty box and luggage together.

What this comparison cannot tell you

  • Cargo dimensions and manufacturer load ratings cannot predict wind noise, fuel use or how a particular bag packs around mounting hardware.

What the facts say

What the comparison shows

Useful conclusions from the current roof cargo boxes comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.

Compared set

18 of 26 models checked match every need here: “Carry camping gear” and “Open it from either side”.

18 matching models from 26 checked
See the checked facts and calculation notes
Compared set
26 models
Source records
2 for the products shown
Catalog updated

Match countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “Carry camping gear” and “Open it from either side”. A need with no documented match does not count.

Facts and source records used for the products in this recommendation
ProductNeeds matchedChecked factsSource records
Thule Pulse 2 M
  • Carry camping gear
  • Open it from either side
  • The box holds 14 cubic feet.
  • It accepts gear up to 155 centimeters long.
  • The box uses dualside access.
Thule Force 3 M
  • Carry camping gear
  • Open it from either side
  • The box holds 14 cubic feet.
  • It accepts gear up to 155 centimeters long.
  • The box uses dualside access.

Ready to choose?

Check the price. Read the owner reviews.

Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Links open in a new tab.