Main trade-off
TIMEMORE Bricks 01S
The cup is rated for 35 g even though the hopper holds 40 g. A shared 36 g example needs dividing.
Head-to-head
Choose Bricks 01S when recipes fit its 35 g catch cup and a narrow, stepped-control grinder suits a mixed brewing routine. Choose original Mignon Zero when a shared 36 g recipe should fit both hopper and cup, or espresso needs stepless adjustment. Zero lists 45 g for both capacities. Its espresso-focused burrs do not make it the same product as Zero Brew, and its US working dimensions need more room than the smaller global depth figure suggests.
Before you choose
For an example 600 ml brew at 60 g/L, you need 36 g of coffee. Bricks can load that amount but its 35 g cup is below the requirement. Zero lists 45 g for both hopper and receiving cup, so the complete nominal path accommodates it. That is a useful reason to choose Zero if shared filter brews recur alongside espresso. For a 30 g recipe, both already fit, so capacity alone no longer justifies the larger setup. Neither capacity predicts how the coffee will taste.
What this is based on
0.6 L × 60 g/L = 36 g. Compare with Bricks 40 g input and 35 g output, versus Zero 45 g at both ends. Nominal ratings vary with beans and grind bulk.
Main trade-off
The cup is rated for 35 g even though the hopper holds 40 g. A shared 36 g example needs dividing.
Main trade-off
This is the original espresso Zero. Do not expect the different burr specification of Zero Brew or Zero 65.


Bricks 01S or original Mignon Zero for separately weighed coffee? Compare a 36 g shared brew, stepped versus stepless espresso and the real working space.
Both are compact electric single-dose choices for a household that does not want a large hopper full of one bean. Bricks emphasizes a narrow all-purpose body, while original Zero brings the Mignon espresso workflow.
Winner by situation
Bricks has the narrower documented body and covers that nominal cup requirement.
Zero’s nominal 45 g hopper and cup cover the dose. Bricks’ cup is below it.
Zero uses stepless adjustment.
Bricks has discrete settings, while Zero leaves continuous positioning to you.
What matters in practice
For an example 600 ml brew at 60 g/L, you need 36 g of coffee. Bricks can load that amount but its 35 g cup is below the requirement. Zero lists 45 g for both hopper and receiving cup, so the complete nominal path accommodates it. That is a useful reason to choose Zero if shared filter brews recur alongside espresso. For a 30 g recipe, both already fit, so capacity alone no longer justifies the larger setup. Neither capacity predicts how the coffee will taste.
0.6 L × 60 g/L = 36 g. Compare with Bricks 40 g input and 35 g output, versus Zero 45 g at both ends. Nominal ratings vary with beans and grind bulk.
If one person keeps chasing a shot setting between clicks, Zero’s stepless adjustment is relevant. If both people prefer recording fixed settings for small filter and espresso doses, Bricks offers clear discrete positions. Neither machine weighs the beans or remembers which coffee was used last. Single dosing keeps each bean choice deliberate, but the next person still has to restore the recipe. Pick the control that addresses that real friction rather than treating a 55 mm flat burr as an automatic taste upgrade.
Stepped versus stepless controls and manual single-dose routines. No measured extraction equivalence, flavor or retention result.
A shared kitchen often needs the coffee station to leave room for food preparation. Bricks publishes a 102 by 150 mm base. Zero’s US seller specifies 4.75 by 6.75 inches, deeper than the maker’s 140 mm figure, so plan around the larger installed allowance instead of promising a tight fit. Also leave room to remove the cup and use the knocker or bellows. If the grinder has to move after every use, test that handling yourself. The nominal base does not include every accessory or prove comfortable lifting.
Published Bricks base and US Zero dimensions, with the conflicting global Zero depth explicitly excluded from a tight-fit claim. No total operating-footprint measurement.

TIMEMORE, Bricks 01S
Small espresso and filter recipes stay within 35 g, and the narrow body matters.

Eureka, Mignon Zero 55 mm
A 36 g shared recipe should fit both nominal 45 g capacities without dividing the dose.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | TIMEMORE Bricks 01S | Eureka Mignon Zero 55 mm | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hopper | 40 g | 45 g | Both suit small measured batches, with different upper limits. |
| Grounds cup | 35 g | 45 g | The cup creates a larger practical gap than the five-gram hopper difference suggests. |
| Adjustment | 150 stepped positions | Stepless micrometric knob | Zero can select between marked settings, while Bricks gives fixed stops to record. |
| Clearing the outlet | Rotary knocker | Single-dose bellows | Allow room for the actual hand action, not just the base. |
| Brewing emphasis | Espresso and pour-over product brief | Original espresso model, with occasional pour-over described by US retailer | Zero Brew is a separate model. The shared name does not transfer its filter burrs. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose TIMEMORE Bricks 01S. Bricks meets the batch requirement in the narrower body.
Choose Eureka Mignon Zero 55 mm. Zero’s complete nominal dose capacity and stepless dial address those needs.
What matters in practice
You want a small grinder for your own espresso, but the same appliance sometimes has to make coffee for two. A modest capacity difference can change whether that shared brew is one batch or two.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current premium coffee grinders comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIMEMORE Bricks 01S |
|
| |
| Eureka Mignon Zero 55 mm |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Small espresso and filter recipes stay within 35 g, and the narrow body matters.
You prefer fixed settings and a rotary outlet-clearing action rather than a bellows routine.
See price & reviews on Amazon
A 36 g shared recipe should fit both nominal 45 g capacities without dividing the dose.
You need stepless espresso adjustment and accept weighing, bellows use and cup transfer.
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.