Main trade-off
QNAP TS-464-8G-US
The control-rich interface takes careful setup.
Head-to-head
Choose TS-464 for HDMI, hardware transcoding and PCIe expansion. Choose DS425+ for the Synology DSM workflow.
Before you choose
Main trade-off
The control-rich interface takes careful setup.
Main trade-off
The 2GB base memory is modest for many apps.


QNAP TS-464-8G-US and Synology DS425+ compared by drive layout, network and processor, best use.
The practical choice turns on best use, then on the constraints in your own setup.
Before you choose
If the plan includes a network upgrade and another PCIe accessory, TS-464’s single expansion slot makes the exact card choice important. Two separate cards cannot occupy it together. Investigate a supported combination card or decide which job takes priority before buying. Choose QNAP for a verified expansion plan, or DS425+ when its built-in connections are sufficient and the added hardware would go unused.
TS-464 has one PCIe Gen3 x2 slot. QNAP offers different expansion roles, but compatibility, card size and shared bandwidth must be checked for the chosen model. DS425+ does not list a comparable general expansion slot.
DS425+ ships with 2GB memory. If object recognition in Synology Photos is part of the family archive, include a compatible upgrade that clears the documented 4GB minimum. QNAP’s selected 8GB configuration avoids that particular small-memory starting point, but uses different photo software. Choose the photo workflow first, then budget its exact requirements rather than comparing RAM as a proxy for recognition quality.
Synology explicitly publishes the object-recognition minimum. The selected TS-464-8G has 8GB. Neither fact establishes relative recognition accuracy, indexing time or support for identical albums and search features.
Winner by situation
Both records list “2.5 Gbps network. Plex use supported” for network and processor. Both records show the same result for “Network and processor”, so this row does not separate them.
A hardware video engine matters when the NAS must convert compatible 4K files for remote viewers.
Redundant storage and remote photo access protect the library while keeping it usable.
Direct TV connection requires a display output on the NAS itself.
Containers and home apps need a compatible processor plus enough usable memory.
Guided setup and clear software matter more than deep controls for a first NAS.

QNAP, TS-464-8G-US
The chassis has 4-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Synology, DS425+
The chassis has 4-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | QNAP TS-464-8G-US | Synology DiskStation DS425+ | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive layout | 4 storage bays | 4 storage bays | Both records show the same result for “Drive layout”, so this row does not separate them. |
| Network and processor | 2.5 Gbps network. Plex use supported | 2.5 Gbps network. Plex use supported | Both records show the same result for “Network and processor”, so this row does not separate them. |
What you give up
What matters in practice
Both have four SATA bays, two M.2 slots and Intel Celeron J4125 or N5095 class processors.
TS-464 has HDMI and PCIe expansion.
DS425+ starts with 2GB while this TS-464 variation has 8GB.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| QNAP TS-464-8G-US |
|
|
|
| Synology DiskStation DS425+ |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Transcode 4K video
See price & reviews on Amazon
Protect family photos
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.