Main trade-off
QNAP TS-264-8G-US
Two bays provide no single-parity option.
Head-to-head
QNAP TS-264-8G-US vs UGREEN NASync DXP2800: QNAP can add a supported network card to a two-drive setup
The short answer
Choose the TS-264 if QTS and a supported PCIe adapter solve your brief. The DXP2800 offers the simpler N100-based UGOS Pro route with one 2.5GbE port.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
Protected capacity with equal 12TB drives
QNAP TS-264-8G-US gives 12TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.
What this is based on
Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.
Main trade-off
UGREEN NASync DXP2800
Two SATA bays cap growth and rule out parity layouts.
QNAP TS-264-8G-US
- Choose it for
- You need QTS, dual network ports or a supported PCIe adapter
- You want QTS with PCIe expansion slot for software and expansion route
- Main trade-off
- Two bays provide no single-parity option.
UGREEN NASync DXP2800
- Choose it for
- You prefer UGOS Pro and an Intel N100 platform
- You want UGOS Pro for software and expansion route
- Main trade-off
- Two SATA bays cap growth and rule out parity layouts.
About this comparison
Compare TS-264-8G-US and DXP2800 by protected storage, included networking and the exact SSD or application layout you need.
Two compact Intel NAS models differ in expansion and software.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
A protected archive using 12 TB disks in every internal SATA bay
Using RAID 1 for two disks or RAID 5 for three or more disks, QNAP TS-264-8G-US gives 12TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.
- QNAP TS-264-8G-US
- Similar
- UGREEN NASync DXP2800
- Similar
A workstation already matching the faster included Ethernet port
Included port rates are 2.5GbE and 2.5GbE. Use the 100GB calculation alongside the actual client speed.
- QNAP TS-264-8G-US
- Similar
- UGREEN NASync DXP2800
- Similar
Several local services sharing the supplied RAM
QNAP TS-264-8G-US supplies 8 GB RAM and supports 16 GB. UGREEN NASync DXP2800 supplies 8 GB and supports 16 GB. Compare the stated application memory requirement with the supplied configuration before budgeting for an upgrade. RAM capacity alone does not establish application speed.
- QNAP TS-264-8G-US
- Similar
- UGREEN NASync DXP2800
- Similar
Use two separate onboard Ethernet interfaces without an adapter
The TS-264 has two physical 2.5GbE ports, so a direct workstation segment and a LAN connection can occupy separate interfaces. The DXP2800 has one 2.5GbE port, so the same physical layout needs another supported networking approach.
- QNAP TS-264-8G-US
- Better fit
- UGREEN NASync DXP2800
- Not suitable
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
Protected capacity with equal 12TB drives
QNAP TS-264-8G-US gives 12TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB before formatting in this example. Changing chassis does not increase this protected capacity.
How we reached this conclusion
Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.
100GB transfer at the included port ceiling
The line-rate lower bound is 320 seconds for QNAP TS-264-8G-US and 320 seconds for UGREEN NASync DXP2800. Real copies take longer. A 1GbE client makes the lower bound 800 seconds for both.
How we reached this conclusion
Decimal 100GB × 8 = 800 gigabits. Divide 800 by the fastest included port rate, 2.5Gbps or 2.5Gbps. Ignore protocol overhead only for this lower-bound calculation. Optional adapters and aggregated ports are excluded.
A separate network segment changes the compact-NAS choice
The TS-264 has two physical 2.5GbE ports, so a direct workstation segment and a LAN connection can occupy separate interfaces. The DXP2800 has one 2.5GbE port, so the same physical layout needs another supported networking approach.
How we reached this conclusion
Required topology is 2 wired network interfaces. TS-264 supplies 2. DXP2800 supplies 1. Separate interfaces do not by themselves increase one transfer speed and require correct routing.
Choice A
QNAP, TS-264-8G-US
QNAP TS-264-8G-US
The chassis has 2-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.
- Best matched use
- run Plex at home and transcode 4K video
Checked facts
- The chassis has 2-bay storage.
- Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.
- Plex media serving is supported.
Choice B
UGREEN, DXP2800
UGREEN NASync DXP2800
The chassis has 2-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.
- Best matched use
- run Plex at home and transcode 4K video
Checked facts
- The chassis has 2-bay storage.
- Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.
- Plex media serving is supported.
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | QNAP TS-264-8G-US | UGREEN NASync DXP2800 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Celeron N5095 | Intel N100 | Media engines, application architecture and concurrency depend on this platform. |
| Software and expansion route | QTS with PCIe expansion slot | UGOS Pro | Choose the applications and supported add-ons required for the job. |
| Included Ethernet port count | Two 2.5GbE ports | One 2.5GbE port | A dedicated workstation cable and the household LAN can occupy separate physical interfaces on the QNAP. |
| PCIe expansion slot | PCIe Gen 3 x2 slot | No PCIe card slot documented | Check a supported QNAP adapter when the planned storage or network layout exceeds the onboard interfaces. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose QNAP TS-264-8G-US
- QTS can feel dense to a first-time NAS owner.
If you choose UGREEN NASync DXP2800
- One network port provides no second wired path.
Recommendation switch
The decision flips if...
You need QTS, dual network ports or a supported PCIe adapter
Choose QNAP TS-264-8G-US. TS-264 provides QTS, two 2.5 GbE interfaces and a PCIe slot. A direct workstation connection and a separate LAN connection can use distinct physical ports.
You prefer UGOS Pro and an Intel N100 platform
Choose UGREEN NASync DXP2800. DXP2800 supplies 8 GB RAM, two SATA bays and two M.2 positions around an Intel N100 platform. Its single 2.5 GbE interface must cover the planned network layout.
What matters in practice
How to make the call
Start with the required storage layout
Choose the TS-264 if QTS and a supported PCIe adapter solve your brief. The DXP2800 offers the simpler N100-based UGOS Pro route with one 2.5GbE port.
Work through the drive budget
Both have two SATA bays, two M.2 slots and 8GB supplied memory. None of those shared values should be presented as a reason to upgrade between them.
Check the actual client and application plan
The TS-264 has dual 2.5GbE ports and a PCIe slot. Additional network paths can separate traffic, but a single transfer only benefits when the client, protocol and network configuration support the intended path.
What this comparison cannot tell you
- Capacity examples use equal 12TB drives before formatting, snapshots and filesystem overhead.
- Ethernet calculations are lower bounds. Disk performance, network protocol and other traffic add time.
- Memory capacity does not certify application speed or a VM count.
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
Compared set
Only 10 of 32 models checked match every need here: “Start with two drives” and “Survive one drive failure”.
10 matching models from 32 checkedSee the checked facts and calculation notes
Match countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “Start with two drives” and “Survive one drive failure”. A need with no documented match does not count.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| QNAP TS-264-8G-US |
|
|
|
| UGREEN NASync DXP2800 |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
QNAP TS-264-8G-US
You need QTS, dual network ports or a supported PCIe adapter
See price & reviews on AmazonUGREEN NASync DXP2800
You prefer UGOS Pro and an Intel N100 platform
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.