Main trade-off
QNAP TS-264-8G-US
The faster network card is optional and occupies the single PCIe slot.
Head-to-head
Choose TS-264-8G for two NVMe slots, more installed memory and a supported PCIe network-upgrade route. Choose DS225+ if Synology Photos and DSM backups are the priority. Both can hold a two-drive mirror, but QNAP leaves more hardware options around that mirror without replacing the enclosure.
Before you choose
TS-264-8G supplies 8 GB versus 2 GB in DS225+. That gives 6 GB more installed memory for the operating system and apps to share. It is a real starting-capacity difference, without proving four times the performance.
What this is based on
8 / 2 = 4. 8 - 2 = 6 GB. These are installed-memory capacities on the selected product variants.
Main trade-off
The faster network card is optional and occupies the single PCIe slot.
Main trade-off
No NVMe or PCIe slots.


Compare QNAP TS-264-8G and Synology DS225+ for two-drive storage, apps and future networking. See which upgrades keep the hard-drive mirror intact.
Choose TS-264-8G for two NVMe slots, more installed memory and a supported PCIe network-upgrade route. Choose DS225+ if Synology Photos and DSM backups are the priority. Both can hold a two-drive mirror, but QNAP leaves more hardware options around that mirror without replacing the enclosure.
Winner by situation
QNAP provides separate M.2 positions. Synology does not.
QNAP documents a PCIe route. Card, client and network compatibility still apply.
DS225+ runs Synology's software environment.
That network segment limits the path until it is upgraded.
What matters in practice
TS-264-8G supplies 8 GB versus 2 GB in DS225+. That gives 6 GB more installed memory for the operating system and apps to share. It is a real starting-capacity difference, without proving four times the performance.
8 / 2 = 4. 8 - 2 = 6 GB. These are installed-memory capacities on the selected product variants.
Filling both SATA bays leaves DS225+ with no internal SSD slot. TS-264 still has two NVMe positions. QNAP can therefore accommodate a two-SSD plan without removing either hard drive, subject to compatible drives and the chosen storage mode.
Both have 2 SATA bays. QNAP adds 2 independent M.2 positions and Synology has 0. Filling the SATA pair does not consume QNAP's M.2 positions.
QNAP's optional faster network card uses its single PCIe slot. If you also planned a PCIe storage card, you cannot assume both separate cards fit together. Decide which expansion is essential before counting every advertised option in one future system.
TS-264 has 1 PCIe Gen 3 x2 slot. Two separate PCIe cards need 2 slots. A supported combination card would need its own compatibility check.

QNAP, TS-264-8G-US
A two-bay NAS with two built-in NVMe slots, dual 2.5GbE and a PCIe slot for supported SSD or network expansion. The selected current 8G configuration supplies 8 GB RAM.

Synology, DS225+
The chassis has 2-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | QNAP TS-264-8G-US | Synology DiskStation DS225+ | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| SATA bays | 2 | 2 | The basic mirrored hard-drive capacity is the same for equal drives. |
| Built-in M.2 slots | Two NVMe 2280, PCIe Gen 3 x1 each | None | QNAP can add compatible SSDs without using a SATA bay. |
| Installed RAM | 8 GB on the selected 8G model | 2 GB | The supplied memory differs by 6 GB. It does not establish an application-count guarantee. |
| Official RAM ceiling | 16 GB on the current SODIMM revision | 6 GB | Confirm the QNAP hardware revision before planning a memory upgrade. |
| Built-in Ethernet | Two 2.5GbE | One 2.5GbE and one 1GbE | Both have a 2.5GbE path, with different second-port capabilities. |
| Internal PCIe expansion | One Gen 3 x2 slot, compatible network-card options | None | QNAP documents optional 5GbE and 10GbE cards. Those cards and the matching network cost extra. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose QNAP TS-264-8G-US. TS-264 has two built-in NVMe positions.
Choose Synology DiskStation DS225+. DS225+ provides the Synology software environment.
Choose neither. Both compared enclosures have two.
What matters in practice
This page uses the TS-264-8G-US listing. QNAP's current specification documents SODIMM memory from January 2024 onward, while older revisions can differ. The included 8 GB is clear in the selected model. If a later RAM upgrade is important, ask the seller to confirm the revision before relying on the current 16 GB ceiling.
TS-264 does not include 10GbE. It provides a PCIe path for a compatible card. A faster client adapter, switch and suitable storage may also be needed. Price that whole route if it motivates the purchase, rather than treating a diskless 2.5GbE NAS as a ready-made 10GbE system.
NVMe slots and expansion cards make QNAP more flexible, but the chassis still has only two SATA bays. If the long-term plan is a large hard-drive array with several disks, a four-bay enclosure may be the better starting point. Both models still need a separate backup for important data.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| QNAP TS-264-8G-US |
|
|
|
| Synology DiskStation DS225+ |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Add NVMe storage or cache while retaining two SATA drives
See price & reviews on Amazon
Use Synology Photos, Drive and DSM backup tools
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.