Head-to-head

QNAP TS-264 vs Synology DS225+: QNAP leaves SSD and card upgrades around a two-drive mirror

The short answer

Choose TS-264-8G for two NVMe slots, more installed memory and a supported PCIe network-upgrade route. Choose DS225+ if Synology Photos and DSM backups are the priority. Both can hold a two-drive mirror, but QNAP leaves more hardware options around that mirror without replacing the enclosure.

Before you choose

The reasoning and the trade-offs

The selected QNAP ships with four times the RAM

TS-264-8G supplies 8 GB versus 2 GB in DS225+. That gives 6 GB more installed memory for the operating system and apps to share. It is a real starting-capacity difference, without proving four times the performance.

What this is based on

8 / 2 = 4. 8 - 2 = 6 GB. These are installed-memory capacities on the selected product variants.

Main trade-off

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

The faster network card is optional and occupies the single PCIe slot.

Main trade-off

Synology DiskStation DS225+

No NVMe or PCIe slots.

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

Choose it for
  • Add NVMe storage or cache while retaining two SATA drives
  • Keep a documented PCIe path to compatible faster networking
Main trade-off
The faster network card is optional and occupies the single PCIe slot.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Synology DiskStation DS225+

Synology DiskStation DS225+

Choose it for
  • Use Synology Photos, Drive and DSM backup tools
  • Keep a straightforward two-drive NAS with one 2.5GbE connection
Main trade-off
No NVMe or PCIe slots.
See price & reviews on Amazon

Analysis updated , Catalog updated , Amazon.com / United States

About this comparison

Compare QNAP TS-264-8G and Synology DS225+ for two-drive storage, apps and future networking. See which upgrades keep the hard-drive mirror intact.

Choose TS-264-8G for two NVMe slots, more installed memory and a supported PCIe network-upgrade route. Choose DS225+ if Synology Photos and DSM backups are the priority. Both can hold a two-drive mirror, but QNAP leaves more hardware options around that mirror without replacing the enclosure.

Winner by situation

Start with what you need it to do

  • I want two HDDs plus two NVMe devices

    QNAP provides separate M.2 positions. Synology does not.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Better fit
    Synology DiskStation DS225+
    Not suitable
  • I may add a compatible 10GbE card later

    QNAP documents a PCIe route. Card, client and network compatibility still apply.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Depends
    Synology DiskStation DS225+
    Not suitable
  • My priority is the DSM photo and backup workflow

    DS225+ runs Synology's software environment.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Depends
    Synology DiskStation DS225+
    Better fit
  • I only have a 1GbE switch today

    That network segment limits the path until it is upgraded.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Similar
    Synology DiskStation DS225+
    Similar

What matters in practice

The differences that matter

The selected QNAP ships with four times the RAM

TS-264-8G supplies 8 GB versus 2 GB in DS225+. That gives 6 GB more installed memory for the operating system and apps to share. It is a real starting-capacity difference, without proving four times the performance.

How we reached this conclusion

8 / 2 = 4. 8 - 2 = 6 GB. These are installed-memory capacities on the selected product variants.

A hard-drive mirror can stay intact while adding SSDs

Filling both SATA bays leaves DS225+ with no internal SSD slot. TS-264 still has two NVMe positions. QNAP can therefore accommodate a two-SSD plan without removing either hard drive, subject to compatible drives and the chosen storage mode.

How we reached this conclusion

Both have 2 SATA bays. QNAP adds 2 independent M.2 positions and Synology has 0. Filling the SATA pair does not consume QNAP's M.2 positions.

The network-upgrade route shares one expansion slot

QNAP's optional faster network card uses its single PCIe slot. If you also planned a PCIe storage card, you cannot assume both separate cards fit together. Decide which expansion is essential before counting every advertised option in one future system.

How we reached this conclusion

TS-264 has 1 PCIe Gen 3 x2 slot. Two separate PCIe cards need 2 slots. A supported combination card would need its own compatibility check.

Choice A
QNAP TS-264-8G-US

QNAP, TS-264-8G-US

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

A two-bay NAS with two built-in NVMe slots, dual 2.5GbE and a PCIe slot for supported SSD or network expansion. The selected current 8G configuration supplies 8 GB RAM.

Best matched use
Add NVMe storage or cache while retaining two SATA drives

Checked facts

  • SATA bays: 2
  • Built-in M.2 slots: Two NVMe 2280, PCIe Gen 3 x1 each
  • Installed RAM: 8 GB on the selected 8G model
  • Official RAM ceiling: 16 GB on the current SODIMM revision
Choice B
Synology DiskStation DS225+

Synology, DS225+

Synology DiskStation DS225+

The chassis has 2-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Best matched use
Use Synology Photos, Drive and DSM backup tools

Checked facts

  • SATA bays: 2
  • Built-in M.2 slots: None
  • Installed RAM: 2 GB
  • Official RAM ceiling: 6 GB

Meaningful differences

What changes the fit

Meaningful differences between QNAP TS-264-8G-US and Synology DiskStation DS225+
What changesQNAP TS-264-8G-USSynology DiskStation DS225+Why it matters
SATA bays22The basic mirrored hard-drive capacity is the same for equal drives.
Built-in M.2 slotsTwo NVMe 2280, PCIe Gen 3 x1 eachNoneQNAP can add compatible SSDs without using a SATA bay.
Installed RAM8 GB on the selected 8G model2 GBThe supplied memory differs by 6 GB. It does not establish an application-count guarantee.
Official RAM ceiling16 GB on the current SODIMM revision6 GBConfirm the QNAP hardware revision before planning a memory upgrade.
Built-in EthernetTwo 2.5GbEOne 2.5GbE and one 1GbEBoth have a 2.5GbE path, with different second-port capabilities.
Internal PCIe expansionOne Gen 3 x2 slot, compatible network-card optionsNoneQNAP documents optional 5GbE and 10GbE cards. Those cards and the matching network cost extra.

What you give up

Every choice has a cost

If you choose QNAP TS-264-8G-US

  • Memory-upgrade planning requires checking the hardware revision.

If you choose Synology DiskStation DS225+

  • The supplied 2 GB and official 6 GB ceiling leave less memory headroom.

Recommendation switch

The decision flips if...

I need SSDs alongside a two-hard-drive mirror

Choose QNAP TS-264-8G-US. TS-264 has two built-in NVMe positions.

I want DSM rather than QTS for daily management

Choose Synology DiskStation DS225+. DS225+ provides the Synology software environment.

I need four internal SATA bays

Choose neither. Both compared enclosures have two.

What matters in practice

How to make the call

01

Compare the exact 8G offer

This page uses the TS-264-8G-US listing. QNAP's current specification documents SODIMM memory from January 2024 onward, while older revisions can differ. The included 8 GB is clear in the selected model. If a later RAM upgrade is important, ask the seller to confirm the revision before relying on the current 16 GB ceiling.

02

Separate an upgrade path from an included feature

TS-264 does not include 10GbE. It provides a PCIe path for a compatible card. A faster client adapter, switch and suitable storage may also be needed. Price that whole route if it motivates the purchase, rather than treating a diskless 2.5GbE NAS as a ready-made 10GbE system.

03

Keep the two-drive limit in view

NVMe slots and expansion cards make QNAP more flexible, but the chassis still has only two SATA bays. If the long-term plan is a large hard-drive array with several disks, a four-bay enclosure may be the better starting point. Both models still need a separate backup for important data.

Check these before buying

  • Confirm TS-264-8G-US and the memory revision if upgrading RAM matters.
  • Check the exact PCIe card and drive compatibility before ordering.
  • Include a separate backup and the cost of both hard drives.

What this comparison cannot tell you

  • Storage calculations use equal-capacity compatible drives and decimal TB before formatting, system space and metadata. RAID protects against specified drive failures but does not replace a separate backup.
  • Network figures are link rates rather than measured file-transfer speeds. Software support, memory revision, drive compatibility and the rest of the network must be checked for the exact purchase.

What the facts say

What the comparison shows

Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.

See the checked facts and calculation notes
Compared set
2 models
Source records
2 for the products shown
Catalog updated
Facts and source records used for the products in this recommendation
ProductNeeds matchedChecked factsSource records
QNAP TS-264-8G-US
  • Add NVMe storage or cache while retaining two SATA drives
  • Keep a documented PCIe path to compatible faster networking
  • SATA bays: 2
  • Built-in M.2 slots: Two NVMe 2280, PCIe Gen 3 x1 each
  • Installed RAM: 8 GB on the selected 8G model
  • Official RAM ceiling: 16 GB on the current SODIMM revision
  • Built-in Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE
  • Internal PCIe expansion: One Gen 3 x2 slot, compatible network-card options
Synology DiskStation DS225+
  • Use Synology Photos, Drive and DSM backup tools
  • Keep a straightforward two-drive NAS with one 2.5GbE connection
  • SATA bays: 2
  • Built-in M.2 slots: None
  • Installed RAM: 2 GB
  • Official RAM ceiling: 6 GB
  • Built-in Ethernet: One 2.5GbE and one 1GbE
  • Internal PCIe expansion: None

Ready to choose?

Check the price. Read the owner reviews.

Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Links open in a new tab.