Head-to-head

Nama J2 vs Hurom H400: J2 eases storage and lifting, H400 removes conventional fine-mesh cleaning

The short answer

Choose the J2 when the lower listed weight and height fit your daily storage routine better. Choose the H400 when avoiding a conventional fine mesh strainer is the reason you are changing juicers.

Before you choose

The reasoning and the trade-offs

An 18-inch shelf separates these two

J2 is nominally 0.3 inches below an 18-inch shelf, while H400 is 0.5 inches above it. The small J2 allowance is only a storage screen. You still need a way to lift the machine out and open the hopper safely.

What this is based on

18 minus 17.7 = 0.3. H400 height is 18.5. Closed appliance dimensions do not establish operating clearance.

Main trade-off

Nama J2

The 17.7-inch height excludes a 17-inch shelf before opening the hopper.

Main trade-off

Hurom H400

Removing a mesh strainer does not remove the need to clean the remaining food-contact parts.

Nama J2

Nama J2

Choose it for
  • You move the juicer after every use
  • The 17.7-inch height fits your space better
Main trade-off
The 17.7-inch height excludes a 17-inch shelf before opening the hopper.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Hurom H400

Hurom H400

Choose it for
  • You want a mesh-free separation design
  • The juicer can stay assembled in a taller space
Main trade-off
Removing a mesh strainer does not remove the need to clean the remaining food-contact parts.
See price & reviews on Amazon

Analysis updated , Catalog updated , Amazon.com / United States

About this comparison

Nama J2 vs Hurom H400: compare loading, height and the practical limits that change which juicer fits your daily routine.

Choose the J2 when the lower listed weight and height fit your daily storage routine better. Choose the H400 when avoiding a conventional fine mesh strainer is the reason you are changing juicers.

Winner by situation

Start with what you need it to do

  • Shared counter and repeated lifting

    J2 is lighter on the listed specifications.

    Nama J2
    Better fit
    Hurom H400
    Good
  • Fine mesh cleaning is the main complaint

    H400 changes that specific component.

    Nama J2
    Depends
    Hurom H400
    Better fit
  • 18-inch closed storage shelf

    J2 nominally clears it while H400 does not.

    Nama J2
    Good
    Hurom H400
    Not suitable
  • Loading a recipe together

    Both support that routine.

    Nama J2
    Good
    Hurom H400
    Good

What matters in practice

The differences that matter

An 18-inch shelf separates these two

J2 is nominally 0.3 inches below an 18-inch shelf, while H400 is 0.5 inches above it. The small J2 allowance is only a storage screen. You still need a way to lift the machine out and open the hopper safely.

How we reached this conclusion

18 minus 17.7 = 0.3. H400 height is 18.5. Closed appliance dimensions do not establish operating clearance.

The lighter machine may get used more in a shared kitchen

J2 weighs 2.7 lb less. If your counter doubles as food-preparation space and the juicer must move each morning, that difference deserves attention. If it remains in one place, the H400 separation design can become the more relevant advantage.

How we reached this conclusion

14.8 minus 12.1 = 2.7 lb. This is about 18% of H400 listed weight, without a claim about individual lifting ability.

Batch loading does not settle cleanup

Both let you preload prepared ingredients, so a hands-free label does not distinguish the entire routine. Look at the parts waiting in the sink afterward. H400 eliminates the conventional mesh strainer, but the auger and chamber still need cleaning.

How we reached this conclusion

Both manufacturer pages document self-feeding hoppers. H400 documents a strainer-free multi-auger. No matched cleaning-time test is available.

Choice A
Nama J2

Nama, J2

J2

Load prepared ingredients together when you prefer a batch-feeding routine and have a permanent place for the assembled machine.

Best matched use
You move the juicer after every use

Checked facts

  • Loading: Self-feeding hopper
  • Height: 17.7 inches
  • Weight: 12.1 lb
  • Separation approach: Strainer-based chamber
Choice B
Hurom H400

Hurom, H400

H400

The two-part auger handles separation without a conventional fine mesh screen, which changes the parts you clean after juicing.

Best matched use
You want a mesh-free separation design

Checked facts

  • Loading: Self-feeding hopper
  • Height: 18.5 inches
  • Weight: 14.8 lb
  • Separation approach: Strainer-free two-part auger

Meaningful differences

What changes the fit

Meaningful differences between Nama J2 and Hurom H400
What changesNama J2Hurom H400Why it matters
LoadingSelf-feeding hopperSelf-feeding hopperBoth suit prepared recipes loaded together.
Height17.7 inches18.5 inchesThe difference can decide a storage shelf before recipe preferences matter.
Weight12.1 lb14.8 lbJ2 removes 2.7 lb from a lift.
Separation approachStrainer-based chamberStrainer-free two-part augerH400 removes a conventional mesh strainer from cleanup.

What you give up

Every choice has a cost

If you choose Nama J2

  • Hopper loading is not a fixed juice-yield promise.

If you choose Hurom H400

  • At 18.5 inches high, it needs a tall storage space and extra room to open.

Recommendation switch

The decision flips if...

You move the juicer after every use

Choose Nama J2. J2 is 2.7 lb lighter and 0.8 inches shorter on the listed specifications.

You want a mesh-free separation design

Choose Hurom H400. H400 changes cleanup by removing the conventional fine mesh juice strainer.

You require an assembled fit beneath a 17-inch shelf

Choose neither. Both are taller than 17 inches, even before opening the hopper.

What matters in practice

Before you choose

Check these before buying

  • Check the exact model, selected condition, seller and included accessories on Amazon.
  • Measure the closed machine and the separate clearance needed for loading, containers and disassembly.
  • Follow the exact preparation, cleaning and rest instructions supplied with your US model.
  • Check that the selected Hurom seller is authorized for the manufacturer warranty before ordering.

What this comparison cannot tell you

  • Recommendations use documented specifications and stated operating limits. We have not measured matched juice yield, noise, cleaning time or nutritional effects.

What the facts say

What the comparison shows

Useful conclusions from the current juicers comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.

See the checked facts and calculation notes
Compared set
2 models
Source records
3 for the products shown
Catalog updated
Facts and source records used for the products in this recommendation
ProductNeeds matchedChecked factsSource records
Nama J2
  • You move the juicer after every use
  • The 17.7-inch height fits your space better
  • Loading: Self-feeding hopper
  • Height: 17.7 inches
  • Weight: 12.1 lb
  • Separation approach: Strainer-based chamber
Hurom H400
  • You want a mesh-free separation design
  • The juicer can stay assembled in a taller space
  • Loading: Self-feeding hopper
  • Height: 18.5 inches
  • Weight: 14.8 lb
  • Separation approach: Strainer-free two-part auger

Ready to choose?

Check the price. Read the owner reviews.

Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Links open in a new tab.