Main trade-off
Nama J2
The 17.7-inch height excludes a 17-inch shelf before opening the hopper.
Head-to-head
Choose the J2 when the lower listed weight and height fit your daily storage routine better. Choose the H400 when avoiding a conventional fine mesh strainer is the reason you are changing juicers.
Before you choose
J2 is nominally 0.3 inches below an 18-inch shelf, while H400 is 0.5 inches above it. The small J2 allowance is only a storage screen. You still need a way to lift the machine out and open the hopper safely.
What this is based on
18 minus 17.7 = 0.3. H400 height is 18.5. Closed appliance dimensions do not establish operating clearance.
Main trade-off
The 17.7-inch height excludes a 17-inch shelf before opening the hopper.
Main trade-off
Removing a mesh strainer does not remove the need to clean the remaining food-contact parts.


Nama J2 vs Hurom H400: compare loading, height and the practical limits that change which juicer fits your daily routine.
Choose the J2 when the lower listed weight and height fit your daily storage routine better. Choose the H400 when avoiding a conventional fine mesh strainer is the reason you are changing juicers.
Winner by situation
J2 is lighter on the listed specifications.
H400 changes that specific component.
J2 nominally clears it while H400 does not.
Both support that routine.
What matters in practice
J2 is nominally 0.3 inches below an 18-inch shelf, while H400 is 0.5 inches above it. The small J2 allowance is only a storage screen. You still need a way to lift the machine out and open the hopper safely.
18 minus 17.7 = 0.3. H400 height is 18.5. Closed appliance dimensions do not establish operating clearance.
J2 weighs 2.7 lb less. If your counter doubles as food-preparation space and the juicer must move each morning, that difference deserves attention. If it remains in one place, the H400 separation design can become the more relevant advantage.
14.8 minus 12.1 = 2.7 lb. This is about 18% of H400 listed weight, without a claim about individual lifting ability.
Both let you preload prepared ingredients, so a hands-free label does not distinguish the entire routine. Look at the parts waiting in the sink afterward. H400 eliminates the conventional mesh strainer, but the auger and chamber still need cleaning.
Both manufacturer pages document self-feeding hoppers. H400 documents a strainer-free multi-auger. No matched cleaning-time test is available.

Nama, J2
Load prepared ingredients together when you prefer a batch-feeding routine and have a permanent place for the assembled machine.

Hurom, H400
The two-part auger handles separation without a conventional fine mesh screen, which changes the parts you clean after juicing.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | Nama J2 | Hurom H400 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading | Self-feeding hopper | Self-feeding hopper | Both suit prepared recipes loaded together. |
| Height | 17.7 inches | 18.5 inches | The difference can decide a storage shelf before recipe preferences matter. |
| Weight | 12.1 lb | 14.8 lb | J2 removes 2.7 lb from a lift. |
| Separation approach | Strainer-based chamber | Strainer-free two-part auger | H400 removes a conventional mesh strainer from cleanup. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose Nama J2. J2 is 2.7 lb lighter and 0.8 inches shorter on the listed specifications.
Choose Hurom H400. H400 changes cleanup by removing the conventional fine mesh juice strainer.
Choose neither. Both are taller than 17 inches, even before opening the hopper.
What matters in practice
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current juicers comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nama J2 |
|
| |
| Hurom H400 |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

You move the juicer after every use
See price & reviews on Amazon
You want a mesh-free separation design
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.