Main trade-off
LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz
It does not provide the USB-C video and laptop charging of a docking monitor.
Head-to-head
Choose 32GR93U for a flat 4K gaming screen. Neo G8 suits a centered gaming position where a strong curve, Mini-LED dimming and 240Hz are welcome.
Before you choose
32GR93U-B works out to about 139.9 pixels per inch, versus 137.7 for LS32BG852NNXGO. A denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while comfortable scaling determines workspace.
What this is based on
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches and 3840 × 2160 at 32 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
Main trade-off
It does not provide the USB-C video and laptop charging of a docking monitor.
Main trade-off
The 1000R curve is strong and will not suit every shared or design-oriented desk.


Choose 32GR93U for a flat 4K gaming screen. Neo G8 suits a centered gaming position where a strong curve, Mini-LED dimming and 240Hz are welcome.
The curve changes shared viewing and desk use
Winner by situation
LG 32GR93U is flat, while Neo G8 has a 1000R curve. A flat screen may better suit off-center viewing and mixed desktop layouts.
Neo G8 uses VA Mini-LED local dimming. LG uses IPS without the same Mini-LED dimming arrangement, although dimming quality still depends on the scene.
LG offers a flat 4K image up to 144 Hz. Neo G8's higher 240 Hz ceiling does not require choosing its curved design when 144 Hz already meets the target.
Neo G8 combines a 1000R curve with a 240 Hz 4K ceiling. LG is flat and stops at 144 Hz.
What matters in practice
32GR93U-B works out to about 139.9 pixels per inch, versus 137.7 for LS32BG852NNXGO. A denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while comfortable scaling determines workspace.
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches and 3840 × 2160 at 32 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
32GR93U-B draws 8.3 million native pixels per frame and LS32BG852NNXGO 8.3 million. Their refresh ceilings are 144Hz and 240Hz respectively.
Native pixels = width × height. Refresh interval =1000 / Hz, giving 6.9 and 4.2 ms. These are signal and cadence calculations, not measured frame rates, input lag or pixel response.
The theoretical interval is 4.17 ms at 240Hz versus 6.94 ms at 144Hz.
1000 / 240 = 4.17 ms. 1000 / 144 = 6.94 ms. This is refresh cadence, not measured input lag or pixel response.

LG, 32GR93U-B
A flat 32-inch 4K screen gives games more physical room and leaves plenty of pixels for work. Its 144Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 inputs make it a straightforward PC and console option.

Samsung, LS32BG852NNXGO
The Neo G8 pairs 4K detail with a 240Hz ceiling and Mini LED local dimming. Its pronounced curve makes it a more deliberate gaming-desk choice than a flat office screen.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz | Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 32-inch | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 | Operating-system scaling changes usable logical workspace. |
| Panel diagonal | 31.5 in | 32 in | A nominal screen class may differ slightly from the measured active diagonal. |
| Maximum refresh | 144Hz | 240Hz | Check the exact input, resolution and overclock conditions. |
| Panel technology | IPS | VA Mini LED | Panel type alone does not establish a measured color or motion winner. |
| Laptop power | No USB-C laptop charging | No USB-C laptop charging | Host, cable and negotiated power profile must support the desired delivery. |
| Chassis width | 714 mm | Check exact drawing | Allow additional room for cables, arms and neighboring equipment. |
| Stand depth | 278 mm | Check exact drawing | The included stand can take more desk depth than the display cabinet. |
What you give up
What matters in practice
Neo G8 uses a 1000R curve. LG is flat. A centered player may like the wrap, while side-by-side work and off-center viewing can favor a flat layout.
Both render about 8.29 million pixels per frame. Samsung 240Hz requires much higher frame delivery than LG 144Hz to use the full ceiling.
Samsung uses VA Mini-LED local dimming. LG IPS behavior differs in black level and viewing angle. A badge alone does not establish the quality of dimming in every scene.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current computer monitors comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
All 50 models remain in view on this guide. The answer comes from the facts and trade-offs shown on the page.
50 matching models from 50 checkedSamsung Odyssey Neo G8 32-inch lists 240 Hz for maximum refresh rate, 67% above LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz at 144 Hz.
Match countNo matcher need is preselected here. Open the matcher to add the needs that apply to your home, room or setup.
Calculation noteThis uses the highest published refresh mode. Resolution, connection and color settings can limit when that rate is available. 44 of 50 models have comparable published figures for context.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
| Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 32-inch | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Prefer a flat screen for mixed work
See price & reviews on Amazon
Want Mini-LED local dimming
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.