Main trade-off
Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
The 31.5-inch panel needs more desk width than the 27-inch UltraSharp.
Head-to-head
Choose U3225QE for a work laptop and a capable Thunderbolt hub. LG 32GR93U suits a desktop gaming setup where USB-C charging and desk docking are unnecessary.
Before you choose
U3225QE works out to about 139.9 pixels per inch, versus 139.9 for 32GR93U-B. Their pixel densities are close enough that layout and connection needs are stronger separators.
What this is based on
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches and 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
Main trade-off
The 31.5-inch panel needs more desk width than the 27-inch UltraSharp.
Main trade-off
It does not provide the USB-C video and laptop charging of a docking monitor.


Choose U3225QE for a work laptop and a capable Thunderbolt hub. LG 32GR93U suits a desktop gaming setup where USB-C charging and desk docking are unnecessary.
The screen canvas is almost identical
Winner by situation
U3225QE supplies the Thunderbolt-centered hub and USB-C laptop video. LG 32GR93U lacks USB-C video and charging.
32GR93U provides a 4K gaming screen up to 144 Hz for a separately connected desktop. Dell reaches 120 Hz and adds laptop-docking features.
U3225QE provides up to 140 W USB-C laptop power. LG supplies no USB-C charging, so that requirement needs another power route.
LG reaches 144 Hz at 4K, while Dell stops at 120 Hz. Confirm the source and connection support the intended 4K timing.
What matters in practice
U3225QE works out to about 139.9 pixels per inch, versus 139.9 for 32GR93U-B. Their pixel densities are close enough that layout and connection needs are stronger separators.
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches and 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
U3225QE draws 8.3 million native pixels per frame and 32GR93U-B 8.3 million. Their refresh ceilings are 120Hz and 144Hz respectively.
Native pixels = width × height. Refresh interval =1000 / Hz, giving 8.3 and 6.9 ms. These are signal and cadence calculations, not measured frame rates, input lag or pixel response.
U3225QE stand is 63.12 mm shallower than 32GR93U and supplies the USB-C power route absent on LG.
278 - 214.88 = 63.12 mm. Dell lists 140W USB-C, LG has no USB-C video or charging.

Dell, U3225QE
A larger 4K work screen brings 120Hz scrolling, 140-watt charging and a Thunderbolt hub to a desk that needs fewer separate boxes.

LG, 32GR93U-B
A flat 32-inch 4K screen gives games more physical room and leaves plenty of pixels for work. Its 144Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 inputs make it a straightforward PC and console option.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor | LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 | Operating-system scaling changes usable logical workspace. |
| Panel diagonal | 31.5 in | 31.5 in | A nominal screen class may differ slightly from the measured active diagonal. |
| Maximum refresh | 120Hz | 144Hz | Check the exact input, resolution and overclock conditions. |
| Panel technology | IPS Black | IPS | Panel type alone does not establish a measured color or motion winner. |
| Laptop power | Up to 140W | No USB-C laptop charging | Host, cable and negotiated power profile must support the desired delivery. |
| Chassis width | 713.2 mm | 714 mm | Allow additional room for cables, arms and neighboring equipment. |
| Stand depth | 214.88 mm | 278 mm | The included stand can take more desk depth than the display cabinet. |
What you give up
What matters in practice
Both use 31.5-inch 4K panels. Dell concentrates on hub features and IPS Black, while LG concentrates on the gaming connection and motion package.
Dell offers up to 140W and USB-C video. LG lacks USB-C video and charging, which can require another dock or several cables.
Dell lists 214.88 mm versus 278 mm on LG. That can leave more keyboard space without reducing panel size.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current computer monitors comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
All 50 models remain in view on this guide. The answer comes from the facts and trade-offs shown on the page.
50 matching models from 50 checkedLG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz lists 144 Hz for maximum refresh rate, 20% above Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor at 120 Hz.
Match countNo matcher need is preselected here. Open the matcher to add the needs that apply to your home, room or setup.
Calculation noteThis uses the highest published refresh mode. Resolution, connection and color settings can limit when that rate is available. 44 of 50 models have comparable published figures for context.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
| LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Connect a work laptop and peripherals
See price & reviews on Amazon
Use a desktop gaming PC
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.