Main trade-off
ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch 4K
The panel is limited to 60Hz.
Head-to-head
Choose PA279CRV when a compatible laptop needs more than 65W or your Windows display plan uses DisplayPort MST chaining. Choose S2725QC for 4K at up to 120Hz and built-in speakers on a simpler desk. Both are 27-inch 4K screens, so the useful difference is what the connection must carry and how you use motion.
Before you choose
For a laptop that requires an 85W USB-C power profile during sustained work, PA279CRV's 96W ceiling can cover the wattage requirement if the negotiated profile and cable are compatible. S2725QC's 65W ceiling cannot supply 85W.
What this is based on
The 85W workload is an explicit example. A 65W source is below that requirement, while a 96W maximum still needs a compatible device and cable.
Main trade-off
The panel is limited to 60Hz.
Main trade-off
USB-C power tops out at 65W.


Compare PA279CRV and S2725QC for a charging laptop, a second display and a desk shared between creative work and 120Hz play.
Choose PA279CRV when a compatible laptop needs more than 65W or your Windows display plan uses DisplayPort MST chaining. Choose S2725QC for 4K at up to 120Hz and built-in speakers on a simpler desk. Both are 27-inch 4K screens, so the useful difference is what the connection must carry and how you use motion.
Winner by situation
ASUS has a 96W ceiling. Dell's 65W ceiling is below the example requirement.
PA279CRV tops out at 60Hz.
ASUS has DisplayPort MST output. The computer and second display must support the layout.
ASUS documents 99% Adobe RGB. Dell's cited gamut claim is sRGB.
What matters in practice
For a laptop that requires an 85W USB-C power profile during sustained work, PA279CRV's 96W ceiling can cover the wattage requirement if the negotiated profile and cable are compatible. S2725QC's 65W ceiling cannot supply 85W.
The 85W workload is an explicit example. A 65W source is below that requirement, while a 96W maximum still needs a compatible device and cable.
PA279CRV's DisplayPort MST output can reduce the number of separate display cables returning to a compatible computer. S2725QC has no display output, so a second screen needs another host output or suitable dock.
The ASUS port is specifically DisplayPort MST. Dell's listed downstream USB-C socket is for USB data and power, not another display output.
PA279CRV documents Adobe RGB and DCI-P3 coverage, while Dell's claim here is sRGB and its panel reaches 120Hz. Choose ASUS when the job explicitly needs its documented color-space coverage.
The claimed color spaces differ, so their percentages are not subtracted. Refresh ceilings are 60Hz and 120Hz with suitable source and connection.

ASUS, PA279CRV
A compact 4K ProArt screen brings wide-gamut factory calibration, 96-watt USB-C power and display chaining to a creator desk.

Dell, S2725QC
Dell brings 4K resolution, 120Hz refresh, USB-C charging and speakers to a simpler 27-inch home-office screen.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch 4K | Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panel and refresh | 27-inch 4K at 60Hz | 27-inch 4K at up to 120Hz | Both show the same pixel dimensions, but the motion ceiling differs. |
| USB-C power | Up to 96W | Up to 65W | Laptop charging compatibility and workload determine whether either replaces its adapter. |
| Display output | DisplayPort MST output | No display output in the documented port list | A second screen needs a different connection plan on Dell. |
| Published color coverage | 99% Adobe RGB and 99% DCI-P3 | 99% sRGB | Match the intended color space rather than treating all percentages as the same measure. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch 4K. PA279CRV has the higher documented charging ceiling, subject to profile and cable compatibility.
Choose Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor. S2725QC supports that refresh ceiling.
What matters in practice
For a laptop that requires an 85W USB-C power profile during sustained work, PA279CRV's 96W ceiling can cover the wattage requirement if the negotiated profile and cable are compatible. S2725QC's 65W ceiling cannot supply 85W. Choose ASUS for that conditional one-cable brief. If the laptop comfortably operates within 65W, the extra charging ceiling may bring no practical benefit and Dell's 120Hz option can matter more.
PA279CRV's DisplayPort MST output can reduce the number of separate display cables returning to a compatible computer. S2725QC has no display output, so a second screen needs another host output or suitable dock. Choose ASUS when the computer supports the planned MST extended-desktop layout. Do not assume every Mac or USB-C socket supports that arrangement, and verify the requested resolution and refresh rate for both displays.
PA279CRV documents Adobe RGB and DCI-P3 coverage, while Dell's claim here is sRGB and its panel reaches 120Hz. Choose ASUS when the job explicitly needs its documented color-space coverage. Choose Dell when 120Hz scrolling or compatible games matter more and sRGB covers the work. Neither the gamut percentage nor refresh rate proves color accuracy, HDR quality or gaming latency in your room.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current computer monitors comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch 4K |
|
| |
| Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Supply up to 96W to a compatible laptop
See price & reviews on Amazon
Use 4K at up to 120Hz
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.