Main trade-off
ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch USB-C
The 65-watt ceiling is below the 96 watts of the PA278CFRV.
Head-to-head
Choose PA278CV for USB-C laptop charging and a work-focused setup. S2725DSM suits a desktop that benefits from 144Hz motion at the same QHD resolution.
Before you choose
PA278CV works out to about 108.8 pixels per inch, versus 108.8 for S2725DSM. Their pixel densities are close enough that layout and connection needs are stronger separators.
What this is based on
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
Main trade-off
The 65-watt ceiling is below the 96 watts of the PA278CFRV.
Main trade-off
It has no USB-C laptop video or charging connection.


Choose PA278CV for USB-C laptop charging and a work-focused setup. S2725DSM suits a desktop that benefits from 144Hz motion at the same QHD resolution.
The image workspace is a tie
Winner by situation
PA278CV accepts USB-C video and supplies up to 65 W power. S2725DSM lacks USB-C laptop video and charging.
S2725DSM suits a separately connected desktop with its 144 Hz QHD panel. USB-C docking is unavailable, so a laptop would need a separate display and power arrangement.
PA278CV lists 150 mm of height adjustment against S2725DSM at 110 mm. Check actual minimum and maximum screen height for the seated position.
S2725DSM reaches 144 Hz against PA278CV at 75 Hz, while both retain the same 2560 × 1440 resolution.
What matters in practice
PA278CV works out to about 108.8 pixels per inch, versus 108.8 for S2725DSM. Their pixel densities are close enough that layout and connection needs are stronger separators.
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
PA278CV draws 3.7 million native pixels per frame and S2725DSM 3.7 million. Their refresh ceilings are 75Hz and 144Hz respectively.
Native pixels = width × height. Refresh interval =1000 / Hz, giving 13.3 and 6.9 ms. These are signal and cadence calculations, not measured frame rates, input lag or pixel response.
The ProArt supplies 65W USB-C and a 150 mm height range, against no USB-C charging and 110 mm on DSM.
150 - 110 = 40 mm. This compares adjustment travel, not absolute screen height.

ASUS, PA278CV
A QHD ProArt display keeps text comfortably sized and supplies up to 65 watts through the same cable used for video. The adjustable stand and DisplayPort output suit a work desk that may grow.

Dell, S2725DSM
A 27-inch QHD display with 144Hz refresh makes sense when comfortable app sizing matters more than fitting 4K detail on the desk. Height adjustment and built-in speakers cover the basics.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch USB-C | Dell 27 Plus QHD Monitor | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1440 | Operating-system scaling changes usable logical workspace. |
| Panel diagonal | 27 in | 27 in | A nominal screen class may differ slightly from the measured active diagonal. |
| Maximum refresh | 75Hz | 144Hz | Check the exact input, resolution and overclock conditions. |
| Panel technology | IPS | IPS | Panel type alone does not establish a measured color or motion winner. |
| Laptop power | Up to 65W | No USB-C laptop charging | Host, cable and negotiated power profile must support the desired delivery. |
| Chassis width | 615 mm | Check exact drawing | Allow additional room for cables, arms and neighboring equipment. |
| Stand depth | 228 mm | Check exact drawing | The included stand can take more desk depth than the display cabinet. |
What you give up
What matters in practice
Both are 27-inch 2560 by 1440 IPS displays. The meaningful difference is connection convenience versus refresh rate, not pixel density.
PA278CV accepts video and provides up to 65W over USB-C. Dell DSM lacks that video-and-charge connection, requiring a separate display and power arrangement.
ASUS lists 150 mm adjustment and Dell 110 mm. Check the actual minimum and maximum screen height before equating range with a comfortable final position.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current computer monitors comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
All 50 models remain in view on this guide. The answer comes from the facts and trade-offs shown on the page.
50 matching models from 50 checkedDell 27 Plus QHD Monitor lists 144 Hz for maximum refresh rate, 92% above ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch USB-C at 75 Hz.
Match countNo matcher need is preselected here. Open the matcher to add the needs that apply to your home, room or setup.
Calculation noteThis uses the highest published refresh mode. Resolution, connection and color settings can limit when that rate is available. 44 of 50 models have comparable published figures for context.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch USB-C | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
| Dell 27 Plus QHD Monitor | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Connect and charge a laptop
See price & reviews on Amazon
Use a desktop with separate charging needs
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.