Main trade-off
ASUS ProArt 24-inch WUXGA Monitor
There is no USB-C video connection or laptop charging.
Head-to-head
Choose PA248QV for a smaller 16:10 display on a compact desk. PA278CV adds a larger QHD canvas and USB-C video with 65W laptop charging.
Before you choose
PA248QV works out to about 93.9 pixels per inch, versus 108.8 for PA278CV. A denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while comfortable scaling determines workspace.
What this is based on
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 1920 × 1200 at 24.1 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
Main trade-off
There is no USB-C video connection or laptop charging.
Main trade-off
The 65-watt ceiling is below the 96 watts of the PA278CFRV.


Choose PA248QV for a smaller 16:10 display on a compact desk. PA278CV adds a larger QHD canvas and USB-C video with 65W laptop charging.
The connector can change the total purchase
Winner by situation
PA248QV is 533 mm wide, compared with PA278CV at 615 mm. Its 82 mm narrower body better accommodates a constrained horizontal space.
PA278CV provides USB-C video and up to 65 W charging. PA248QV does not provide that video-and-power route.
PA248QV uses a 24.1-inch 1920 × 1200 panel with a 16:10 ratio. PA278CV is a larger 27-inch 16:9 QHD display.
PA278CV adds 640 horizontal pixels and 240 vertical pixels, with a larger 27-inch panel. Scaling still determines the practical size and amount of visible content.
What matters in practice
PA248QV works out to about 93.9 pixels per inch, versus 108.8 for PA278CV. A denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while comfortable scaling determines workspace.
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 1920 × 1200 at 24.1 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
PA248QV draws 2.3 million native pixels per frame and PA278CV 3.7 million. Their refresh ceilings are 75Hz and 75Hz respectively.
Native pixels = width × height. Refresh interval =1000 / Hz, giving 13.3 and 13.3 ms. These are signal and cadence calculations, not measured frame rates, input lag or pixel response.
PA278CV is 615 mm wide against 533 mm and adds 65W USB-C delivery.
615 - 533 = 82 mm, or 3.23 inches. PA248QV has no USB-C charging.

ASUS, PA248QV
A compact 16:10 panel keeps extra lines visible in documents and calibrated sRGB work without taking the width of a 27-inch display.

ASUS, PA278CV
A QHD ProArt display keeps text comfortably sized and supplies up to 65 watts through the same cable used for video. The adjustable stand and DisplayPort output suit a work desk that may grow.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | ASUS ProArt 24-inch WUXGA Monitor | ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch USB-C | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1440 | Operating-system scaling changes usable logical workspace. |
| Panel diagonal | 24.1 in | 27 in | A nominal screen class may differ slightly from the measured active diagonal. |
| Maximum refresh | 75Hz | 75Hz | Check the exact input, resolution and overclock conditions. |
| Panel technology | IPS | IPS | Panel type alone does not establish a measured color or motion winner. |
| Laptop power | No USB-C laptop charging | Up to 65W | Host, cable and negotiated power profile must support the desired delivery. |
| Chassis width | 533 mm | 615 mm | Allow additional room for cables, arms and neighboring equipment. |
| Stand depth | 211 mm | 228 mm | The included stand can take more desk depth than the display cabinet. |
What you give up
What matters in practice
PA248QV does not have USB-C video or charging. PA278CV adds both, so a laptop setup may need fewer separate connections.
PA248QV uses 1200 rows, while PA278CV uses 1440. The 16:10 smaller panel preserves more vertical room than a 1080p monitor of similar size.
PA278CV lists 150 mm of height adjustment versus 130 mm on PA248QV. The range does not establish the final eye-level height without the desk and seated position.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current computer monitors comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
All 50 models remain in view on this guide. The answer comes from the facts and trade-offs shown on the page.
50 matching models from 50 checkedASUS ProArt Display 27-inch USB-C lists 109 ppi for calculated pixel density, 16% above ASUS ProArt 24-inch WUXGA Monitor at 94 ppi.
Match countNo matcher need is preselected here. Open the matcher to add the needs that apply to your home, room or setup.
Calculation notePixel density is calculated from the published diagonal and native pixel dimensions, then rounded to the nearest whole pixel per inch. Operating-system scaling still determines effective text size. 44 of 50 models have comparable published figures for context.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS ProArt 24-inch WUXGA Monitor | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
| ASUS ProArt Display 27-inch USB-C | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Fit a narrower desk
See price & reviews on Amazon
Dock a USB-C laptop
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.