Main trade-off
LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
No documented ThinQ phone control
Head-to-head
LG LW6017R vs LG LW6024RSMX: RSMX adds phone control and saves 3 lb without cooling a larger room
The short answer
Choose LG LW6024RSMX when changing settings from your phone is useful. Choose LW6017R when three fan settings matter more than app control. Both are 6,000 BTU fixed-speed units for a room around 250 square feet. RSMX is 3 lb lighter, but it does not cool a larger room.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
Phone control trades away one fan setting
RSMX suits someone who wants to change settings from a phone. LW6017R offers three fan settings rather than two, which is useful when high feels too strong and low too weak. Neither specification proves that one unit sounds less intrusive in a bedroom.
What this is based on
Current LG tables list ThinQ and Wi-Fi for RSMX, with two cooling and fan speeds. LW6017R lists three speeds and an included remote. Both publish the same 57/52 dBA high/low figures, without a matched bedroom test.
Main trade-off
LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
Two fan settings instead of three
LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
- Choose it for
- I want three fan settings
- A panel and remote cover my normal routine
- Main trade-off
- No documented ThinQ phone control
LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
- Choose it for
- I want to change settings from my phone
- The 3 lb lower published weight helps with seasonal handling
- Main trade-off
- Two fan settings instead of three
About this comparison
LG LW6017R or LW6024RSMX? Compare phone control, fan settings, seasonal lifting and window requirements before choosing a 6,000 BTU unit.
Choose LG LW6024RSMX when changing settings from your phone is useful. Choose LW6017R when three fan settings matter more than app control. Both are 6,000 BTU fixed-speed units for a room around 250 square feet. RSMX is 3 lb lighter, but it does not cool a larger room.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
Change settings from my phone
RSMX adds ThinQ over Wi-Fi. Its remote still works when app control is unnecessary.
- LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
- Not suitable
- LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
- Better fit
I want a middle fan setting
LW6017R offers three speeds while RSMX lists high and low.
- LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
- Better fit
- LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
- Good
I remove the unit each season
The current RSMX net weight is 3 lb lower. Follow the handling and support instructions for either unit.
- LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
- Good
- LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
- Better fit
A quieter bedroom is my main goal
The current tables publish equal high/low sound figures and neither unit uses an inverter. No matched sleep-noise test establishes a winner.
- LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
- Depends
- LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
- Depends
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
Phone control trades away one fan setting
RSMX suits someone who wants to change settings from a phone. LW6017R offers three fan settings rather than two, which is useful when high feels too strong and low too weak. Neither specification proves that one unit sounds less intrusive in a bedroom.
How we reached this conclusion
Current LG tables list ThinQ and Wi-Fi for RSMX, with two cooling and fan speeds. LW6017R lists three speeds and an included remote. Both publish the same 57/52 dBA high/low figures, without a matched bedroom test.
Seasonal lifting is 3 pounds lighter
RSMX weighs 37 lb against the current 40 lb listing for LW6017R. That is 7.5% less published machine weight to handle during seasonal installation. Both still need the support and handling procedure in their manuals, particularly above ground level.
How we reached this conclusion
(40 − 37) ÷ 40 × 100 = 7.5%. These are current published net weights, not shipping weights or a measurement of installation effort.
A shallower cabinet does not promise a different window fit
RSMX is about 1.54 inches shallower, but both require a 12-inch minimum opening. Cabinet depth alone cannot tell you how much of the unit projects into the room or whether a storm-window frame obstructs installation. Use the mounting drawing before choosing either for a cramped sill.
How we reached this conclusion
14.37 − (12 + 5/6) = 1.5367 inches. LG’s RSMX product page and manual disagree on the width range, so the current manual’s 21 to 35 inches remains the screening range and the supplied unit’s instructions control final fit.
Try your real numbers
Will either unit cool the room and fit the window?
The result checks hard limits only. Preferences stay out of the calculation.
LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
Does not fit these inputs6,000 BTU at 115V with a 21 to 35-inch width range and 12-inch minimum opening height. Your calculated target is 8,000 BTU.
LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
Does not fit these inputs6,000 BTU at 115V with a 21 to 35-inch width range and 12-inch minimum opening height. Your calculated target is 8,000 BTU.
Cooling follows the current room-size method with adjustments for sun, extra people and kitchen heat. The opening check uses the stored manufacturer limits.
Choice A
LG, LW6017R
6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
Cooling capacity is 6,000 BTU per hour. The documented sash range is 21 to 35 inches wide.
- Best matched use
- I want three fan settings
Checked facts
- Controls: Panel and included remote
- Cooling and fan speeds: 3
- Published net weight: 40 lb
- Cabinet depth: 14.37 inches
Choice B
LG, LW6024RSMX
6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
Cooling capacity is 6,000 BTU per hour. The documented sash range is 21 to 35 inches wide.
- Best matched use
- I want to change settings from my phone
Checked facts
- Controls: Panel, remote and ThinQ over Wi-Fi
- Cooling and fan speeds: 2, high and low
- Published net weight: 37 lb
- Cabinet depth: 12 5/6 inches, about 12.83
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner | LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Panel and included remote | Panel, remote and ThinQ over Wi-Fi | RSMX adds phone control when Wi-Fi and the app are available. |
| Cooling and fan speeds | 3 | 2, high and low | LW6017R adds an intermediate setting. This does not prove quieter operation. |
| Published net weight | 40 lb | 37 lb | RSMX removes 3 lb from seasonal lifting, without making solo installation safe. |
| Cabinet depth | 14.37 inches | 12 5/6 inches, about 12.83 | RSMX is about 1.54 inches shallower. The mounting drawing still decides window fit. |
| Combined efficiency rating | 11.3 CEER | 11.5 CEER | The small rating gap is not a reliable household bill forecast. |
| Cooling size and compressor | 6,000 BTU, fixed-speed | 6,000 BTU, fixed-speed | Smart controls do not create an inverter or a larger-room solution. |
| Minimum window opening height | 12 inches | 12 inches in the current manual | Neither earns a low-window advantage from the height requirement. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
- 3 lb heavier in the current published specifications
If you choose LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
- App control needs Wi-Fi and setup
Recommendation switch
The decision flips if...
Phone control would save a regular trip to the window
Choose LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner. ThinQ adds that capability when the unit has Wi-Fi and the app is configured.
You often want a speed between high and low
Choose LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner. LW6017R provides a third fan setting rather than making you choose between two.
What matters in practice
How to make the call
Start with the room, then the controls
Both are rated for a room around 250 square feet. Sun exposure, cooking heat, ceiling height and an open doorway can change the actual cooling load. A phone app will not make an undersized unit suitable for a hotter or larger space.
Check the exact installation drawing
Both require a 12-inch opening. LG’s current RSMX page and manual disagree on the width range, so measure against the instructions supplied with the unit. Check sill shape, storm-window obstruction and support hardware as well as width.
Treat the efficiency gap proportionately
The CEER ratings are 11.3 and 11.5. That is a small specification difference. Operating hours, room heat gain and thermostat use prevent a credible household savings estimate from those two numbers alone.
What this comparison cannot tell you
- No matched cooling, noise or annual energy-cost test is used.
- Published weight does not establish that one person can safely install the unit.
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current window air conditioners comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
See the checked facts and calculation notes
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner |
|
| |
| LG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
LG 6,000 BTU Window Air Conditioner
I want three fan settings
See price & reviews on AmazonLG 6,000 BTU Smart Wi-Fi Window Air Conditioner
I want to change settings from my phone
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.