Main trade-off
Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT
No automatic end lifting and SBC-only Bluetooth.
Head-to-head
AT-LPW50BT vs Denon DP-500BT: Shallower body or end lifting?
The short answer
Choose DP-500BT if you want the arm lifted and platter stopped when a side ends, while accepting manual cueing at the start. Choose LPW50BT when its shallower body and compatible VM95 stylus route matter more. It is 17 mm shallower but stays fully manual. LPW50BT uses SBC, and Denon’s wider codec support still depends on the receiver. Neither Bluetooth connection receives music from a phone.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
Manual cueing can coexist with a useful interruption safeguard
DP-500BT asks the listener to place the arm, then lifts it and stops the platter when the side ends. LPW50BT leaves the ending to the listener as well. Someone who enjoys starting a record but often gets pulled into another household task can therefore prefer Denon without wanting a fully automatic deck. It still does not return the arm or protect against a bump during the side. After its documented standby behavior, the next listener must use the normal restart controls rather than assuming the Bluetooth connection starts the record.
What this is based on
Enjoyment of manual starting plus frequent missed endings crossed with documented lift/stop and restart behavior. No unattended safety guarantee.
Main trade-off
Denon DP-500BT
Manual start and receiver switching still require physical steps.
Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT
- Choose it for
- Use a 340 mm-deep body and compatible VMN95 stylus changes.
- Keep manual wired or wireless 33/45 playback, accepting SBC and end handling.
- Main trade-off
- No automatic end lifting and SBC-only Bluetooth.
Denon DP-500BT
- Choose it for
- Have the arm lift and platter stop after the side, without expecting automatic starting or return.
- Use compatible Bluetooth receivers, following the documented receiver-off handoff when changing devices.
- Main trade-off
- Manual start and receiver switching still require physical steps.
About this comparison
LPW50BT vs Denon DP-500BT for shared-room wireless records. Compare end-of-side lifting, cabinet depth and the receiver handoff when headphones change.
Both are manual-start Bluetooth decks with a built-in phono stage and replaceable cartridges for a home listening system. Denon adds end lifting and a broader codec list, while Audio-Technica offers a shallower body and the VM95 path.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
I often miss the end and want the arm lifted
Denon lifts and stops automatically.
- Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT
- Caution
- Denon DP-500BT
- Better fit
A 17 mm body-depth saving matters
LPW50BT is shallower, with clearance still required.
- Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT
- Better fit
- Denon DP-500BT
- Caution
I specifically want the VMN95 stylus route
LPW50BT starts with VM95E.
- Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT
- Better fit
- Denon DP-500BT
- Caution
I expect seamless receiver handoff or phone music input
Neither assumption is supported by this evidence.
- Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT
- Caution
- Denon DP-500BT
- Caution
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
Manual cueing can coexist with a useful interruption safeguard
DP-500BT asks the listener to place the arm, then lifts it and stops the platter when the side ends. LPW50BT leaves the ending to the listener as well. Someone who enjoys starting a record but often gets pulled into another household task can therefore prefer Denon without wanting a fully automatic deck. It still does not return the arm or protect against a bump during the side. After its documented standby behavior, the next listener must use the normal restart controls rather than assuming the Bluetooth connection starts the record.
How we reached this conclusion
Enjoyment of manual starting plus frequent missed endings crossed with documented lift/stop and restart behavior. No unattended safety guarantee.
The narrower cabinet choice gives up the automatic ending
LPW50BT is 420 by 340 mm, against Denon’s 426 by 357 mm. Its 17 mm depth saving can matter on existing furniture, but the buyer then retains the manual end-of-side task. Denon’s 6 mm extra width is a much smaller difference than its depth, so measure the relevant direction rather than describing one as generally compact. Both still need cable, cover and handling clearance. If the only placement forces unstable support or obstructed access, choose another installation rather than relying on the body measurement alone.
How we reached this conclusion
Existing shallow furniture plus interruption handling crossed with two dimensional differences and the end-action trade. No exact shelf-fit promise.
Two people sharing headphones and a speaker need a handoff plan
Denon instructs switching off the current Bluetooth receiver before connecting or pairing the next one. That is a real household step when one person uses headphones and another wants the room speaker. Its broader codec list does not prove seamless multipoint switching or a better audible result. LPW50BT uses SBC and also needs a compatible receiver with usable volume control. Check the actual devices before buying, and remember that both turntables send audio outward. They are not Bluetooth speakers for a phone playlist.
How we reached this conclusion
Alternating household receivers crossed with documented pairing workflow, receiver controls and transmitter direction. No seamless handoff or phone-input capability inferred.
Choice A
Audio-Technica, AT-LPW50BT-RW
Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT
Use a 340 mm-deep body and compatible VMN95 stylus changes.
- Best matched use
- Use a 340 mm-deep body and compatible VMN95 stylus changes.
Checked facts
- End action: Manual arm and stop.
- Body depth: 340 mm.
- Wireless codecs: SBC.
- Cartridge and speed: VM95E, 33/45.
Choice B
Denon, DP-500BT
Denon DP-500BT
Have the arm lift and platter stop after the side, without expecting automatic starting or return.
- Best matched use
- Have the arm lift and platter stop after the side, without expecting automatic starting or return.
Checked facts
- End action: Automatic lift and platter stop, no return.
- Body depth: 357 mm.
- Wireless codecs: aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX and SBC.
- Cartridge and speed: Denon MM with DSN-85, 33/45/78.
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT | Denon DP-500BT | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| End action | Manual arm and stop. | Automatic lift and platter stop, no return. | Denon removes the missed-end stylus job, not the initial cue. |
| Body depth | 340 mm. | 357 mm. | Audio-Technica saves 17 mm of body depth before clearance. |
| Wireless codecs | SBC. | aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX and SBC. | The receiver must support the chosen codec. No sound-quality result is implied. |
| Cartridge and speed | VM95E, 33/45. | Denon MM with DSN-85, 33/45/78. | A documented speed is separate from the appropriate stylus for a specific record. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT
- Someone must return to stop playback and lift the arm.
If you choose Denon DP-500BT
- The deeper body and 78 stylus requirements need checking before installation or old-record playback.
Recommendation switch
The decision flips if...
Automatic end lifting solves a recurring interruption
Choose Denon DP-500BT. DP-500BT supplies it without automating the start.
Furniture depth and the VM95 path outweigh end automation
Choose Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT. LPW50BT fits those requirements.
What matters in practice
Before you choose
A compact wireless setup still needs someone to finish the record and manage the next listening device.
What this comparison cannot tell you
- No codec-based sound-quality ranking.
- No automatic starting on either model.
- No claim of universal 78 stylus compatibility.
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current turntables comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
See the checked facts and calculation notes
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT |
|
| |
| Denon DP-500BT |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Audio-Technica AT-LPW50BT
Use a 340 mm-deep body and compatible VMN95 stylus changes.
Keep manual wired or wireless 33/45 playback, accepting SBC and end handling.
See price & reviews on AmazonDenon DP-500BT
Have the arm lift and platter stop after the side, without expecting automatic starting or return.
Use compatible Bluetooth receivers, following the documented receiver-off handoff when changing devices.
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.