Main trade-off
Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim
Remote access depends on a compatible Z-Wave hub.
Head-to-head
Schlage Connect vs Encode Plus: Connect needs a compatible Z-Wave hub, Plus has built-in Wi-Fi
The short answer
Choose the Z-Wave Schlage Connect when a compatible existing home or security hub will control the lock. Choose Encode Plus for built-in WiFi through Schlage Home or Apple home key entry. Both replace the deadbolt and provide a touchscreen plus a physical key. The network protocol is the first compatibility check.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
An existing Z-Wave controller can settle the choice
Connect fits a compatible Z-Wave system. Encode Plus has a different native control path.
What this is based on
Z-Wave compatibility belongs to the selected Connect model and the exact hub integration.
Main trade-off
Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
Its native control path differs from a Z-Wave lock.
Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Choose it for
- Join a compatible Z-Wave home system
- Keep control in the supported hub platform
- Main trade-off
- Remote access depends on a compatible Z-Wave hub.
Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Choose it for
- Use Schlage Home through built-in WiFi
- Unlock with an iPhone or Apple Watch home key
- Main trade-off
- Its native control path differs from a Z-Wave lock.
About this comparison
Compare Schlage Connect Z-Wave and Encode Plus for an existing alarm hub, Apple home keys and guest-code capacity.
Choose the Z-Wave Schlage Connect when a compatible existing home or security hub will control the lock. Choose Encode Plus for built-in WiFi through Schlage Home or Apple home key entry. Both replace the deadbolt and provide a touchscreen plus a physical key. The network protocol is the first compatibility check.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
Join a compatible Z-Wave alarm hub
Connect is the selected Z-Wave model.
- Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Better fit
- Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Caution
Use Apple home key
Encode Plus supplies the feature.
- Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Not suitable
- Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Better fit
Maintain forty unique active codes
The published limits are 30 and 100.
- Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Not suitable
- Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Better fit
Use local touchscreen codes and a physical key
Both lock packages supply those local access methods.
- Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Good
- Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Good
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
An existing Z-Wave controller can settle the choice
Connect fits a compatible Z-Wave system. Encode Plus has a different native control path.
How we reached this conclusion
Z-Wave compatibility belongs to the selected Connect model and the exact hub integration.
A roster of forty codes exceeds Connect capacity
Forty individually assigned active codes fit within Encode Plus stated 100-code limit and exceed Connect stated 30-code limit.
How we reached this conclusion
40 is greater than 30 and less than 100. This assumes one code per person and no shared codes.
Apple Watch entry requires the Plus feature set
Encode Plus supports Apple home keys, while Connect uses its touchscreen, key and supported hub controls.
How we reached this conclusion
Home key is an explicit supported access method on Encode Plus.
Choice A
Schlage, BE469ZP CAM 619
Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim
The documented door range is 1.375 to 1.75 inches thick. Entry options include keypad.
- Best matched use
- Join a compatible Z-Wave home system
Checked facts
- Radio path: Z-Wave Plus
- Hub for native remote path: Compatible Z-Wave hub required
- Apple home key: Not supported
- Access-code capacity: Up to 30
Choice B
Schlage, BE499WB CAM 619
Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
The documented door range is 1.375 to 1.75 inches thick. Entry options include home-key, keypad, phone.
- Best matched use
- Use Schlage Home through built-in WiFi
Checked facts
- Radio path: Built-in WiFi, plus Apple Home support
- Hub for native remote path: No extra hub for Schlage Home over WiFi
- Apple home key: Supported
- Access-code capacity: Up to 100
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim | Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radio path | Z-Wave Plus | Built-in WiFi, plus Apple Home support | The lock must match the system expected to control it. |
| Hub for native remote path | Compatible Z-Wave hub required | No extra hub for Schlage Home over WiFi | WiFi availability does not make Connect a WiFi lock. |
| Apple home key | Not supported | Supported | A watch tap requires the Encode Plus hardware. |
| Access-code capacity | Up to 30 | Up to 100 | Large guest rosters can exceed the smaller documented limit. |
| Local entry hardware | Touchscreen and physical key | Touchscreen and physical key | Routine local code entry is available on both. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Apple home keys are absent.
If you choose Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
- Apple features require compatible Apple devices and setup.
Recommendation switch
The decision flips if...
My compatible Z-Wave hub will manage the lock
Choose Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim. Connect supplies the required radio.
I need Apple home keys or forty active codes
Choose Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim. Encode Plus supports both.
I need a fingerprint reader
Choose neither. Neither compared lock supplies one.
What matters in practice
How to make the call
An existing Z-Wave controller can settle the choice
If an alarm or home hub already manages Z-Wave devices, check its explicit support for Schlage Connect. That can keep lock routines in the system already used by the household. Encode Plus is suitable when Schlage Home over WiFi is the desired path. A familiar brand name does not make their integrations interchangeable.
A roster of forty codes exceeds Connect capacity
For a household or property needing forty distinct active codes, Encode Plus provides the documented capacity. Connect would require reducing the roster or changing the access plan. Confirm how the chosen app handles scheduling and removal. The numerical capacity does not establish a complete rental-management integration.
Apple Watch entry requires the Plus feature set
Choose Encode Plus when tapping a compatible Apple Watch is a central daily habit. If everyone is happy entering a code and the Z-Wave system is already installed, that extra method may add little. Both retain local code entry, so a phone-free household does not automatically need the Plus model.
What this comparison cannot tell you
- No security, radio-range or battery-life superiority is claimed.
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current smart locks comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
See the checked facts and calculation notes
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim |
|
|
|
| Schlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Schlage Connect Smart Deadbolt with Camelot trim
Join a compatible Z-Wave home system
See price & reviews on AmazonSchlage Encode Plus Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
Use Schlage Home through built-in WiFi
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.