Main trade-off
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE
Shared grass edges and more than three zones complicate its simple-setup promise.
Head-to-head
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE vs Segway Navimow i105N: Raccoon avoids an antenna but needs clear borders and at most three zones
The short answer
Choose Raccoon 2 SE for a clearly bordered small lawn when an RTK antenna is inconvenient. Choose i105N for a mapped layout with more than three zones or a grass setting above 3.15 inches. Raccoon’s simple setup becomes less simple when your grass runs into a neighbor’s lawn.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
A shared grass edge can add dozens of stakes
RoboUP recommends stakes at 40 cm intervals where grass has no clear visual boundary. A straight 20 m shared edge needs about 51 positions including both ends. If that defeats the low-setup appeal, an RTK-mapped solution deserves a closer look.
What this is based on
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE: Recommended stake spacing 0.4 m. 20 / 0.4 + 1 = 51 positions. Segway Navimow i105N: RTK mapping defines the working boundary. Site setup remains required.
Main trade-off
Segway Navimow i105N
It needs an RTK setup and cannot cut below two inches.
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE
- Choose it for
- The lawn has clear visual edges and no more than three zones
- You want to avoid an RTK antenna
- Main trade-off
- Shared grass edges and more than three zones complicate its simple-setup promise.
Segway Navimow i105N
- Choose it for
- The lawn needs more than three separately managed zones
- You maintain grass around 3.5 inches
- Main trade-off
- It needs an RTK setup and cannot cut below two inches.
About this comparison
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE vs Navimow i105N for a small lawn. Compare shared grass boundaries, cutting height, zones and what parallel mowing really covers.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
Three clearly bordered zones with no good RTK position
Raccoon avoids the antenna, subject to its visual-boundary rules.
- RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE
- Better fit
- Segway Navimow i105N
- Caution
Four separately managed grass sections
i105N has the zone allowance, provided overall area and routes fit.
- RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE
- Not suitable
- Segway Navimow i105N
- Better fit
Grass maintained at 3.5 inches
Only i105N reaches that height.
- RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE
- Not suitable
- Segway Navimow i105N
- Better fit
Grass maintained at 1.5 inches
Only Raccoon reaches that low setting.
- RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE
- Better fit
- Segway Navimow i105N
- Not suitable
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
A shared grass edge can add dozens of stakes
RoboUP recommends stakes at 40 cm intervals where grass has no clear visual boundary. A straight 20 m shared edge needs about 51 positions including both ends. If that defeats the low-setup appeal, an RTK-mapped solution deserves a closer look.
How we reached this conclusion
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE: Recommended stake spacing 0.4 m. 20 / 0.4 + 1 = 51 positions. Segway Navimow i105N: RTK mapping defines the working boundary. Site setup remains required.
A taller grass routine reverses the antenna-free preference
At a 3.5-inch target, Raccoon’s maximum is too low while i105N’s range includes it. At 1.5 inches, the result reverses. Desired grass height should be settled before choosing between camera and RTK navigation.
How we reached this conclusion
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE: 30 to 80 mm gives about 1.18 to 3.15 inches. Segway Navimow i105N: Published range 2.0 to 3.6 inches.
A small property can still need too many zones
A front lawn, back lawn and two side strips already make four separately managed zones. That exceeds Raccoon’s three-zone limit even when the total grass area is small. i105N’s twelve-zone allowance solves this specific limit if its total area and passage requirements also fit.
How we reached this conclusion
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE: Three-zone specification. Segway Navimow i105N: Twelve-zone specification, 0.125-acre total rating.
Try your real numbers
Will either mower clear your yard constraints?
The result checks hard limits only. Preferences stay out of the calculation.
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE
Does not fit these inputsRated for 0.15 acre and 36% interior grade, with wire-free setup. Your input is 0.25 acre and 20% grade.
Segway Navimow i105N
Does not fit these inputsRated for 0.125 acre and 30% interior grade, with wire-free setup. Your input is 0.25 acre and 20% grade.
The area check uses the published maximum without adding a reserve. Where a systematic mowing rating is shown, that pattern is required for the maximum area. Boundary slopes can have a lower limit than interior ground. Trees, gates and disconnected zones still need checking.
Choice A
RoboUP, Raccoon 2 SE
Raccoon 2 SE
A small-yard camera-guided mower that avoids an RTK station, provided the lawn has clear visual borders. Parallel mowing has a narrower scope than the headline suggests.
- Best matched use
- The lawn has clear visual edges and no more than three zones
Checked facts
- Rated area: 0.15 acre
- Cutting height: About 1.18 to 3.15 inches
- Zones: Three
- Boundary setup: Visual edges, optional stakes for shared grass
Choice B
Segway, i105N
Navimow i105N
The smaller Navimow i Series model brings virtual boundaries and camera-assisted obstacle detection to an eighth-acre lawn.
- Best matched use
- The lawn needs more than three separately managed zones
Checked facts
- Rated area: 0.125 acre
- Cutting height: 2.0 to 3.6 inches
- Zones: Twelve
- Boundary setup: RTK with mapped boundaries
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE | Segway Navimow i105N | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rated area | 0.15 acre | 0.125 acre | A lawn between these values exceeds the i105N rating. |
| Cutting height | About 1.18 to 3.15 inches | 2.0 to 3.6 inches | Low and taller grass routines lead to opposite choices. |
| Zones | Three | Twelve | Count separately managed lawn sections rather than calling the whole property small. |
| Boundary setup | Visual edges, optional stakes for shared grass | RTK with mapped boundaries | Neither should be released onto an undefined edge near a road or water. |
| Mowing pattern | Parallel target mode limited to flat areas below 80 m² | Systematic mapped mowing | Raccoon’s headline does not promise whole-lawn parallel stripes. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE
- The FAQ limits parallel mowing to flat target areas under 80 square meters. Do not assume whole-lawn stripes.
If you choose Segway Navimow i105N
- RTK positioning still needs a sensible charging and antenna location.
Recommendation switch
The decision flips if...
The lawn has clear visual edges and no more than three zones
Choose RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE. You want to avoid an RTK antenna
The lawn needs more than three separately managed zones
Choose Segway Navimow i105N. You maintain grass around 3.5 inches
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current robotic lawn mowers comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
See the checked facts and calculation notes
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE |
|
|
|
| Segway Navimow i105N |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
RoboUP Raccoon 2 SE
The lawn has clear visual edges and no more than three zones
See price & reviews on AmazonSegway Navimow i105N
The lawn needs more than three separately managed zones
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.