Head-to-head

KEF LSX II LT vs Klipsch The Fives II: KEF keeps the room compact, Fives II connects records and a console directly

The short answer

Choose LSX II LT when the system is all digital and desk or console depth is scarce. Its 180 mm body is about 92 mm shallower than The Fives II. Choose Fives II when a compatible MM turntable, another RCA line player or an HDMI console needs a direct path. KEF has no analog input at all. Both offer network music and USB audio, and both require a cable between the speakers. Fives II’s HDMI passthrough still depends on the whole source and TV chain.

Before you choose

The reasoning and the trade-offs

A future turntable can make a compact digital system a different project

LSX II LT has no analog input, so adding an ordinary phono preamp does not provide a direct turntable route. A compatible conversion or network-source path would need separate research. Fives II can take a compatible MM turntable directly and leave a separate RCA line input for another player. If records are already part of the household plan, include that entire future chain before choosing KEF solely for its smaller body.

What this is based on

No analog input versus dedicated phono and line paths crossed with planned vinyl use. No external converter compatibility is invented.

Main trade-off

KEF LSX II LT

No analog input. A normal phono preamp alone cannot connect a record player.

Main trade-off

Klipsch The Fives II

The cabinets are deeper and wider, and virtual Atmos does not create physical rear or height speakers.

KEF LSX II LT

KEF LSX II LT

Choose it for
  • TV, USB computer and network music cover every source, with shallow furniture.
  • A compact wired pair with one mains connection fits the room.
Main trade-off
No analog input. A normal phono preamp alone cannot connect a record player.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Klipsch The Fives II

Klipsch The Fives II

Choose it for
  • A compatible MM turntable and another RCA line source should connect without an external conversion path.
  • The TV’s eARC port competes with a needed compatible gaming input.
Main trade-off
The cabinets are deeper and wider, and virtual Atmos does not create physical rear or height speakers.
See price & reviews on Amazon

Analysis updated , Catalog updated , Amazon.com / United States

About this comparison

LSX II LT vs Fives II for a shared small room. Compare the compact cabinet against the extra turntable and console hardware each source plan requires.

Both powered network pairs serve a TV, USB computer and shared streaming without a receiver. Their cabinet and analog-source differences matter before any listening preference.

Winner by situation

Start with what you need it to do

  • All-digital work and TV setup on shallow furniture

    KEF retains the source types with about 92 mm less body depth.

    KEF LSX II LT
    Better fit
    Klipsch The Fives II
    Good
  • MM turntable and another RCA source belong in the room

    Fives II supplies separate direct analog paths.

    KEF LSX II LT
    Caution
    Klipsch The Fives II
    Better fit
  • Compatible console needs the extra HDMI source route

    Fives II offers source passthrough, subject to full-chain checks.

    KEF LSX II LT
    Caution
    Klipsch The Fives II
    Better fit
  • No safe cable route between speakers

    Both require an interspeaker cable.

    KEF LSX II LT
    Not suitable
    Klipsch The Fives II
    Not suitable

What matters in practice

The differences that matter

A future turntable can make a compact digital system a different project

LSX II LT has no analog input, so adding an ordinary phono preamp does not provide a direct turntable route. A compatible conversion or network-source path would need separate research. Fives II can take a compatible MM turntable directly and leave a separate RCA line input for another player. If records are already part of the household plan, include that entire future chain before choosing KEF solely for its smaller body.

How we reached this conclusion

No analog input versus dedicated phono and line paths crossed with planned vinyl use. No external converter compatibility is invented.

The compact advantage is substantial when the source list stays digital

KEF saves 91.78 mm of body depth per cabinet, about 3.61 inches, and 55.76 mm of combined width across the pair. With a USB work computer, HDMI television and network music, it retains the required direct source types. That can leave more usable desk or console space in a small shared room. Add cable and placement clearance to either model, and remember that neither removes the interspeaker link.

How we reached this conclusion

271.78 − 180 = 91.78 mm depth, divided by 25.4 = 3.61 inches. 2 × (182.88 − 155) = 55.76 mm width. Shared digital functions are documented.

A console can make the larger pair avoid another switching box

If the TV’s eARC socket is also a needed gaming input, LSX II LT occupies that connection without supplying another HDMI source port. Fives II can accept a compatible source and pass the stated gaming formats through its HDMI input and eARC output. This may avoid an external source switch, but only after checking the exact console, TV and cables. A television with enough suitable spare ports removes much of that advantage.

How we reached this conclusion

HDMI topology crossed with a conditional port shortage, including the circumstance that removes the benefit.

Choice A
KEF LSX II LT

KEF, LSX II LT

LSX II LT

TV, USB computer and network music cover every source, with shallow furniture.

Best matched use
TV, USB computer and network music cover every source, with shallow furniture.

Checked facts

  • Body depth: 180 mm
  • Body width: 155 mm
  • Records and analog: No analog input
  • Console HDMI: TV ARC only
Choice B
Klipsch The Fives II

Klipsch, The Fives II

The Fives II

A compatible MM turntable and another RCA line source should connect without an external conversion path.

Best matched use
A compatible MM turntable and another RCA line source should connect without an external conversion path.

Checked facts

  • Body depth: 271.78 mm
  • Body width: 182.88 mm
  • Records and analog: Separate MM phono and RCA line inputs
  • Console HDMI: Separate source HDMI and TV eARC with stated 4K/120 passthrough

Meaningful differences

What changes the fit

Meaningful differences between KEF LSX II LT and Klipsch The Fives II
What changesKEF LSX II LTKlipsch The Fives IIWhy it matters
Body depth180 mm271.78 mmKEF saves 91.78 mm before cables and placement clearance.
Body width155 mm182.88 mmThe KEF pair saves 55.76 mm of combined cabinet width.
Records and analogNo analog inputSeparate MM phono and RCA line inputsThe source chain changes substantially when records join the room.
Console HDMITV ARC onlySeparate source HDMI and TV eARC with stated 4K/120 passthroughFives II can preserve a compatible source route on a port-limited TV.
Computer and network musicUSB-C audio and built-in streamingUSB-C audio and built-in streamingThese common jobs alone do not require the larger cabinets.

What you give up

Every choice has a cost

If you choose KEF LSX II LT

  • The supplied 3 m C-Link is mandatory. Measure its route and price a longer compatible cable only if needed.

If you choose Klipsch The Fives II

  • Check console, TV, cables and format before relying on stated 4K/120, VRR and ALLM passthrough.

Recommendation switch

The decision flips if...

The source list stays digital and furniture is tight

Choose KEF LSX II LT. LSX II LT provides the smaller complete digital setup.

Records or a console would otherwise need another source workaround

Choose Klipsch The Fives II. Fives II adds the relevant direct connections.

What matters in practice

Before you choose

You want compact speakers in a shared room without creating extra boxes for records or sacrificing a gaming connection.

Check these before buying

  • Check future as well as current source requirements.
  • Measure the interspeaker route and verify the full HDMI chain.

What this comparison cannot tell you

  • No measured sound, bass or gaming-latency winner. Virtual surround processing is not physical surround hardware.

What the facts say

What the comparison shows

Useful conclusions from the current powered speakers comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.

See the checked facts and calculation notes
Compared set
2 models
Source records
5 for the products shown
Catalog updated
Facts and source records used for the products in this recommendation
ProductNeeds matchedChecked factsSource records
KEF LSX II LT
  • TV, USB computer and network music cover every source, with shallow furniture.
  • A compact wired pair with one mains connection fits the room.
  • Body depth: 180 mm
  • Body width: 155 mm
  • Records and analog: No analog input
  • Console HDMI: TV ARC only
  • Computer and network music: USB-C audio and built-in streaming
Klipsch The Fives II
  • A compatible MM turntable and another RCA line source should connect without an external conversion path.
  • The TV’s eARC port competes with a needed compatible gaming input.
  • Body depth: 271.78 mm
  • Body width: 182.88 mm
  • Records and analog: Separate MM phono and RCA line inputs
  • Console HDMI: Separate source HDMI and TV eARC with stated 4K/120 passthrough
  • Computer and network music: USB-C audio and built-in streaming

Ready to choose?

Check the price. Read the owner reviews.

Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

KEF LSX II LT

KEF LSX II LT

TV, USB computer and network music cover every source, with shallow furniture.

A compact wired pair with one mains connection fits the room.

See price & reviews on Amazon
Klipsch The Fives II

Klipsch The Fives II

A compatible MM turntable and another RCA line source should connect without an external conversion path.

The TV’s eARC port competes with a needed compatible gaming input.

See price & reviews on Amazon

Links open in a new tab.