Main trade-off
BLUETTI Apex 300
There are no direct USB or 12V outputs on the base unit. Portable DC use requires the optional DC Hub.
Head-to-head
Apex 300 is the stronger one-box home-system base because it supplies native 120/240V and scales into a multi-unit circuit-backup system. F3000 is better when TT-30, lower complexity and 120V RV loads define the job.
Before you choose
BLUETTI Apex 300 has the stronger fit for “I need native 120V and 240V output” and “I want to feed selected home circuits”. Anker SOLIX F3000 has the stronger fit for “I need a direct 30A RV connection” and “I want faster charging while driving”.
What this is based on
This compares the current strong and useful fit assignments for the exact products. It does not turn them into one overall score.
Main trade-off
There are no direct USB or 12V outputs on the base unit. Portable DC use requires the optional DC Hub.
Main trade-off
A single F3000 is 120V-only. Native 240V output requires a documented two-unit configuration and additional hardware.


Native single-unit 240V flexibility meets a more portable 120V RV-first system.
The practical choice turns on voltage and direct dc outputs, then on the constraints in your own setup.
Winner by situation
For voltage, BLUETTI Apex 300 records “Native 120/240V” and Anker SOLIX F3000 records “120V per unit. Two units for 240V”. This can be a hard compatibility check for the available supply, connection and intended load.
It belongs to an ecosystem with a documented transfer panel or inlet path. Installation may require a qualified electrician.
Wi-Fi or Bluetooth control exposes useful status, charge-rate, schedule or reserve settings.
It has a documented 20ms-or-faster transfer mode. That is not the same as a certified medical or double-conversion UPS.
It includes a documented TT-30 or comparable 30A outlet. Confirm voltage, current and your RV inlet before connecting.
A documented first-party or broadly compatible DC-to-DC accessory supports materially faster vehicle charging. Installation limits still matter.
What matters in practice
BLUETTI Apex 300 has the stronger fit for “I need native 120V and 240V output” and “I want to feed selected home circuits”. Anker SOLIX F3000 has the stronger fit for “I need a direct 30A RV connection” and “I want faster charging while driving”.
This compares the current strong and useful fit assignments for the exact products. It does not turn them into one overall score.
BLUETTI Apex 300 covers 3 of the 3 buyer requirements attached to this comparison. Anker SOLIX F3000 covers 2, missing “I need native 120V and 240V output”.
This count uses the current strong and useful fit assignments for the named products. A requirement counts once, and no arbitrary score is added.
5 of 50 checked portable power stations match this need. BLUETTI Apex 300 is in that group. Anker SOLIX F3000 is not.
The count filters the current category dataset for a strong or useful fit on this one buyer need.
5 of 50 checked portable power stations cover both “I need native 120V and 240V output” and “I may add battery capacity later”. BLUETTI Apex 300 is in that group. Anker SOLIX F3000 is not.
The count is reproduced by filtering the current category dataset for products with a strong or useful fit for both needs.

BLUETTI, Apex 300
A modular 2,764.8Wh station with native 120/240V output, 3,840W power and a path from portable box to multi-unit home system.

Anker SOLIX, A1782
A wheeled 3,072Wh, 3,600W 120V station with TT-30, dual solar controllers and an unusually broad generator/alternator recharge plan.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | BLUETTI Apex 300 | Anker SOLIX F3000 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voltage | Native 120/240V | 120V per unit. Two units for 240V | This can be a hard compatibility check for the available supply, connection and intended load. |
| Direct DC outputs | Optional DC Hub required | Built in | The published output matters only when the room, surface or workload needs the extra headroom. It does not prove better results by itself. |
| Base capacity | 2,764.8Wh | 3,072Wh | This changes how much stored energy is available before expansion batteries or recharging enter the plan. |
What you give up
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current portable power stations comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
Only 5 of 50 models checked match every need here: “I need native 120V and 240V output”, “I may add battery capacity later”, and “I want to feed selected home circuits”.
5 matching models from 50 checkedAnker SOLIX F3000 lists 3,072 Wh for battery capacity, 11% above BLUETTI Apex 300 at 2,764.8 Wh.
Match countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “I need native 120V and 240V output”, “I may add battery capacity later”, and “I want to feed selected home circuits”. A need with no documented match does not count.
Calculation noteThis compares nominal watt-hour capacity. Real delivered energy depends on inverter losses, temperature and load. 50 of 50 models have comparable published figures for context.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLUETTI Apex 300 |
|
| |
| Anker SOLIX F3000 |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

You need 240V from one base unit
See price & reviews on Amazon
A 120V TT-30 outlet is the priority
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.