Main trade-off
BLUETTI AC180
At about 35.27 pounds, it is substantially heavier than newer 1kWh models. It has only one USB-C port.
Head-to-head
Choose DELTA 3 for a lighter carry, expansion and faster transfer. The AC180 gives more built-in energy when it stays beside the load.
Before you choose
For a steady 300W load, BLUETTI AC180 models to about 3.1 hours and EcoFlow DELTA 3 to 2.7 hours.
What this is based on
Hours = nominal Wh × 0.8 / 300W. Inputs 1152Wh and 1024Wh. The 80% factor is a shared planning allowance for unusable energy and conversion losses, not a measured efficiency. Idle draw, temperature and the real load change runtime.
Main trade-off
At about 35.27 pounds, it is substantially heavier than newer 1kWh models. It has only one USB-C port.
Main trade-off
One 500W solar input cannot make use of the Plus model 1000W two-input setup.


Choose DELTA 3 for a lighter carry, expansion and faster transfer. The AC180 gives more built-in energy when it stays beside the load.
Capacity and portability pull in different directions
Winner by situation
The AC180 adds 128Wh, but DELTA 3 cuts 7.67 pounds. For a 300W desk setup, the modeled gain is around 20 minutes, not several more hours.
DELTA 3 weighs 27.6 lb against 35.27 lb for AC180. That saves 7.67 lb on every lift, with about 20 fewer modeled minutes at a steady 300W load.
The shared planning case gives 3.1 hours from BLUETTI AC180 and 2.7 from EcoFlow DELTA 3. Measure actual wattage before choosing a required overnight reserve.
The maximum input is 500W for BLUETTI AC180 and 500W for EcoFlow DELTA 3. Compare your actual panel strings with the voltage and current limits as well as this total.
What matters in practice
For a steady 300W load, BLUETTI AC180 models to about 3.1 hours and EcoFlow DELTA 3 to 2.7 hours.
Hours = nominal Wh × 0.8 / 300W. Inputs 1152Wh and 1024Wh. The 80% factor is a shared planning allowance for unusable energy and conversion losses, not a measured efficiency. Idle draw, temperature and the real load change runtime.
BLUETTI AC180 stores about 32.7 nominal watt-hours per pound, compared with 37.1 for EcoFlow DELTA 3.
Nominal energy divided by published weight: 1152 / 35.27 and 1024 / 27.6. This compares stored energy per lifting weight, not measured efficiency or handle comfort.
DELTA 3 removes about 22% of the AC180 weight while giving up about 11% of its nominal battery capacity.
(35.27 - 27.6) / 35.27 × 100 = 21.7%. (1152 - 1024) / 1152 × 100 = 11.1%.

BLUETTI, AC180
A 1,152Wh station with four US AC outlets, a wireless charging pad and a 1,800W inverter. Its extra battery reserve comes with a notably heavier carry.

EcoFlow, DELTA 3
The expandable DELTA 3 for buyers who do not need the Plus model extra solar input. The battery and inverter are the same size, so the simpler charging setup can be entirely sufficient.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | BLUETTI AC180 | EcoFlow DELTA 3 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal battery energy | 1152 Wh | 1024 Wh | Stored energy determines the starting runtime budget. |
| Continuous AC output | 1800 W | 1800 W | This is the sustained rating used for load screening, separate from surge and boost modes. |
| Lifting weight | 35.27 lb | 27.6 lb | Wheels help on flat ground. A trunk, step or shelf still requires a lift. |
| Maximum solar input | 500 W | 500 W | The panel voltage, current and per-port limits must also fit. |
| Dedicated battery expansion | Fixed base capacity | Supported with compatible equipment | Charging from an external source is different from integrated battery expansion. |
| Published transfer limit | 20 ms | 10 ms | Verify the exact connected device. A short transfer specification does not guarantee uninterrupted operation for every load. |
What you give up
What matters in practice
The AC180 adds 128Wh, but DELTA 3 cuts 7.67 pounds. For a 300W desk setup, the modeled gain is around 20 minutes, not several more hours.
The published 20ms versus 10ms limits favor DELTA 3 for equipment with a short hold-up time. Neither figure is a promise that every computer will stay running.
Both list 500W maximum solar input. Panel voltage, current, connector and cold-weather open-circuit voltage must still match the exact input.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current portable power stations comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
Only 6 of 50 models checked match every need here: “I want power for campsites and weekends away”, “I need backup for household essentials”, and “Solar is a real part of my recharge plan”.
6 matching models from 50 checkedBLUETTI AC180 lists 1,152 Wh for battery capacity, 13% above EcoFlow DELTA 3 at 1,024 Wh.
Match countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “I want power for campsites and weekends away”, “I need backup for household essentials”, and “Solar is a real part of my recharge plan”. A need with no documented match does not count.
Calculation noteThis compares nominal watt-hour capacity. Real delivered energy depends on inverter losses, temperature and load. 50 of 50 models have comparable published figures for context.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLUETTI AC180 |
|
|
|
| EcoFlow DELTA 3 |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Run a fixed load for a little longer
See price & reviews on Amazon
Carry the station regularly
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.