Main trade-off
Traeger Pro Series 22 Pellet Grill
It lacks WiFIRE and has the smaller main and upper racks.
Head-to-head
Choose Pro 22 for local controls and a smaller smoking setup when its 418 sq in main rack meets your needs. Choose Woodridge for app control, a 520 sq in main rack and a combined grease-and-ash keg. Woodridge's 860 sq in total includes its upper rack, so the main-grate increase is smaller than the headline suggests.
Before you choose
Woodridge's total area is about 50.3% above Pro 22's, but its main rack is only about 24.4% larger. A single pan benefits from the 520 versus 418 sq in main grate, while a menu spread across two levels can use more of the 860 total. Choose with your food layout in mind.
What this is based on
Calculations are 860 divided by 572 minus one and 520 divided by 418 minus one. Area does not by itself prove a particular pan fits the grate's shape.
Main trade-off
It lacks WiFIRE and has the smaller main and upper racks.
Main trade-off
The headline area includes an upper rack rather than one large floor.


Compare Traeger Pro 22 and Woodridge for usable main-rack space, app control, pellet reserve and the cleanup routine after smoking.
The practical choice turns on main cooking rack and upper rack and total, then on the constraints in your own setup.
Winner by situation
Woodridge's main grate is 520 sq in against 418, with actual dimensions still needing a check.
Woodridge adds substantially more upper-rack area.
Pro 22 is local-only and Woodridge can also be operated locally.
Woodridge adds WiFIRE and the combined keg.
What matters in practice
Woodridge's total area is about 50.3% above Pro 22's, but its main rack is only about 24.4% larger. A single pan benefits from the 520 versus 418 sq in main grate, while a menu spread across two levels can use more of the 860 total. Choose with your food layout in mind.
Calculations are 860 divided by 572 minus one and 520 divided by 418 minus one. Area does not by itself prove a particular pan fits the grate's shape.
Woodridge's WiFIRE can provide monitoring and control through the app while Pro 22 uses local controls. Its combined keg also collects grease and ash in one accessible place after cooking. Those are useful ownership differences when cooking is frequent, but connectivity does not remove in-person setup, fuel checks or the manufacturer's supervision requirements.
The implication comes from documented control and collection systems. No reduction in total cleanup time or guarantee of uninterrupted cooking is claimed.
Woodridge's hopper rises from 18 to 24 lb, a 33.3% capacity increase, while the total rack area rises by about 50.3%. These percentages describe unrelated quantities. Neither lets you predict how long the grill runs on a fill or whether a larger loaded chamber uses fuel at the same rate.
Calculation is 6 divided by 18. Temperature, weather and cooking behavior are not held constant in the published capacity figures.

Traeger, TFB57PZBO
It provides 572 square inches of cooking area. The pellet hopper holds 18 pounds.

Traeger, Woodridge
A Wi-Fi pellet grill with 860 square inches across two racks, a 24lb hopper and a combined grease and ash keg. It suits larger low-and-slow meals without the Elite side burner.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | Traeger Pro Series 22 Pellet Grill | Traeger Woodridge | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main cooking rack | 418 sq in | 520 sq in | Woodridge adds 102 sq in on the primary cooking plane. |
| Upper rack and total | 154 sq in upper, 572 total | 340 sq in upper, 860 total | Much of the headline increase is on the second level. |
| Hopper | 18 lb | 24 lb | Woodridge holds six more pounds without a guaranteed runtime conversion. |
| Maximum setting | 450°F | 500°F | Woodridge adds 50°F of selectable ceiling. |
| Connectivity | No WiFIRE | WiFIRE app control | The change adds remote information and control, not permission to leave cooking unattended. |
| Cleanup design | Separate grease-bucket system | EZ-Clean combined grease-and-ash keg | The collection arrangement changes the post-cook routine. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose Traeger Pro Series 22 Pellet Grill. Pro 22 covers that smaller setup.
Choose Traeger Woodridge. Woodridge provides those ownership changes.
What matters in practice
The 860 and 572 sq in figures combine racks. For a tall roast or one large tray, start with the main-rack numbers and check the physical dimensions. Woodridge still adds useful room, but presenting the total increase as a 50% larger primary grate would mislead that buyer.
WiFIRE can be helpful when monitoring a cook while staying nearby and handling other household tasks. Pro 22 offers a local-control routine without that connection. Both still require correct startup, food monitoring, fuel management and shutdown, so the app should be valued as a convenience rather than an autonomous cook.
Woodridge's combined grease-and-ash keg is a structural ownership difference, while Pro 22 uses its separate collection and cleaning procedure. Neither removes the need to clean grates and inspect the cooking chamber. Choose the arrangement you can service consistently, especially if the grill is used several times a week.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current pellet grills and smokers comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traeger Pro Series 22 Pellet Grill |
|
|
|
| Traeger Woodridge |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

You want local controls without WiFIRE.
See price & reviews on Amazon
You want WiFIRE monitoring and control.
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.