Main trade-off
SIHOO B300 Pro
The linked B300 Pro is the standard version without a footrest. Its seat is narrower than C300 Pro V2.
Head-to-head
Choose B300 Pro when the shorter minimum seat depth or flip-up arms solve the fit problem. B300 starts at 16.5 inches of seat depth, compared with 16.9 on C300 Pro V2. Choose C300 Pro V2 when its 20.5-inch seat width and rear-pad tilt are useful for your seated position and handheld devices. B300’s seat is 19.1 inches wide. Both reach 18.5 inches of depth and use weight-responsive recline. Neither linked standard package includes a footrest.
Before you choose
A household can include a user who wants more hip room and another who needs a shorter seat. C300 Pro V2 adds 1.4 inches of published width, but its minimum depth is 0.4 inches longer. B300 reaches the same 18.5-inch maximum while retracting farther. Try the shorter user first if both will share the chair. Width and depth are separate fit constraints, and a larger-looking seat does not solve both automatically.
What this is based on
20.5 minus 19.1 equals 1.4 inches of seat width. 16.9 minus 16.5 equals 0.4 inches at minimum depth. Published seat width is not inner-arm clearance.
Main trade-off
The linked B300 Pro is the standard version without a footrest. Its seat is narrower than C300 Pro V2.
Main trade-off
The 16.9-inch minimum depth may be too long even when the extra seat width is welcome.


B300 Pro vs C300 Pro V2 for a shared desk, controller use and limited space. Compare the fit ranges, arm movements and weight that change daily handling.
These SIHOO mesh chairs combine adjustable depth, automatic resistance and movable arms. The useful comparison is the size and movement each user needs, rather than six-dimensional versus eight-dimensional labels.
Winner by situation
B300 reaches 16.5 inches. Try the real fit.
C300 lists 20.5 inches versus 19.1. Check arm spacing separately.
C300 documents that specific arm movement.
B300 is lighter by the published figures, but both need safe handling.
What matters in practice
A household can include a user who wants more hip room and another who needs a shorter seat. C300 Pro V2 adds 1.4 inches of published width, but its minimum depth is 0.4 inches longer. B300 reaches the same 18.5-inch maximum while retracting farther. Try the shorter user first if both will share the chair. Width and depth are separate fit constraints, and a larger-looking seat does not solve both automatically.
20.5 minus 19.1 equals 1.4 inches of seat width. 16.9 minus 16.5 equals 0.4 inches at minimum depth. Published seat width is not inner-arm clearance.
B300’s flip-up arms can clear an apron or make room at the side. C300 Pro V2 can also swing its arms aside, so desk clearance alone does not prove B300 is uniquely suitable. C300 adds rear-pad tilt that may help someone holding a controller or phone with the forearms angled upward. Try that position while seated. An eight-dimensional label does not guarantee better support, but the particular pad movement is relevant to a work-and-gaming desk.
Documented arm movements crossed with desk clearance and handheld-device use. No grip-strength, fatigue or comfort benefit is claimed.
If the chair must go upstairs to a bedroom office or move during a house move, the published 15.94 lb weight difference is worth planning around. It does not tell us how hard either chair rolls across carpet. Caster type, floor surface and load also matter there. B300 reduces the mass to handle compared with C300 Pro V2, but both are bulky assemblies. Arrange suitable help rather than treating the lighter specification as permission to lift alone.
59.64 minus 43.7 equals 15.94 lb, using manufacturer chair weights rather than carton mass. No rolling-force or individual lifting-capacity inference.

SIHOO, Black standard, without footrest
The seat needs to shorten below the C300 Pro V2’s published 16.9-inch minimum.

SIHOO, Black, Standard
You need the additional published seat width and have checked arm spacing too.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | SIHOO B300 Pro | SIHOO Doro C300 Pro V2 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat depth | 16.5 to 18.5 inches | 16.9 to 18.5 inches | B300 adds 0.4 inches at the shorter end, with the same published maximum. |
| Seat width | 19.1 inches | 20.5 inches | C300 adds 1.4 inches of published seat width, not necessarily the same gain between the arms. |
| Arm movements | Six-dimensional arms with flip-up clearance | Eight-dimensional arms with rear-pad tilt and swing-away movement | Both can clear space. C300’s pad tilt is a separate handheld-device option. |
| Chair weight | 43.7 lb | 59.64 lb | C300 is 15.94 lb heavier by the manufacturer figures. This is not a rolling-effort measurement. |
| Recline | Weight-responsive, 105/120/135-degree locks | Weight-responsive, 105/120/135-degree locks | Automatic resistance and the listed angles do not independently justify the larger chair. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose SIHOO B300 Pro. B300 retracts 0.4 inches farther.
Choose SIHOO Doro C300 Pro V2. C300 offers the wider seat and tilting rear pads, subject to a fit trial.
What matters in practice
You want a chair roomy enough for one user without making the seat too long for the other, and it must also work for evening gaming.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current office chairs comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIHOO B300 Pro |
|
| |
| SIHOO Doro C300 Pro V2 |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

The seat needs to shorten below the C300 Pro V2’s published 16.9-inch minimum.
Flip-up arms and a lower chair weight matter for your room setup.
See price & reviews on Amazon
You need the additional published seat width and have checked arm spacing too.
Tilting the rear arm pads helps you find support while holding a controller or phone.
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.