Main trade-off
TerraMaster F4-425
The single network port tops out at 2.5GbE.
Head-to-head
The F4-425 makes room for four SATA disks and RAID 5. The DXP2800 uses two SATA bays but adds two M.2 slots and 8GB memory for a compact application server.
Before you choose
F4-425 gives 36TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB before formatting in this example. The difference is 24TB before filesystem overhead.
What this is based on
Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.
Main trade-off
The single network port tops out at 2.5GbE.
Main trade-off
Two SATA bays cap growth and rule out parity layouts.


Compare F4-425 and DXP2800 by protected storage, included networking and the exact SSD or application layout you need.
Choose hard-drive growth or a smaller SSD-capable server.
Winner by situation
Using RAID 1 for two disks or RAID 5 for three or more disks, F4-425 gives 36TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB before formatting in this example. The difference is 24TB before filesystem overhead.
Included port rates are 2.5GbE and 2.5GbE. Use the 100GB calculation alongside the actual client speed.
TerraMaster F4-425 supplies 4 GB RAM and supports 16 GB. UGREEN NASync DXP2800 supplies 8 GB and supports 16 GB. Compare the stated application memory requirement with the supplied configuration before budgeting for an upgrade. RAM capacity alone does not establish application speed.
If two SATA bays in the F4-425 are allocated to SSDs, only two remain for HDDs. The DXP2800 can instead use its two M.2 slots for SSDs while preserving its two SATA bays, subject to the supported pool layout.
What matters in practice
F4-425 gives 36TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB before formatting in this example. The difference is 24TB before filesystem overhead.
Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.
The line-rate lower bound is 320 seconds for F4-425 and 320 seconds for UGREEN NASync DXP2800. Real copies take longer. A 1GbE client makes the lower bound 800 seconds for both.
Decimal 100GB × 8 = 800 gigabits. Divide 800 by the fastest included port rate, 2.5Gbps or 2.5Gbps. Ignore protocol overhead only for this lower-bound calculation. Optional adapters and aggregated ports are excluded.
If two SATA bays in the F4-425 are allocated to SSDs, only two remain for HDDs. The DXP2800 can instead use its two M.2 slots for SSDs while preserving its two SATA bays, subject to the supported pool layout.
F4-425 has 4 SATA and 0 M.2 positions. Reserving 2 SATA for SSDs leaves 2 for HDDs. DXP2800 has 2 SATA plus 2 M.2. This is a device-placement calculation, not a performance estimate.

TerraMaster, F4-425
Four SATA bays give a growing archive more RAID layout choices than a two-bay mirror. A single 2.5GbE port and 4GB memory keep the specification focused on file storage.

UGREEN, DXP2800
The chassis has 2-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | TerraMaster F4-425 | UGREEN NASync DXP2800 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| SATA drive bays | 4 | 2 | This changes the disk layouts possible inside the main enclosure. |
| Supplied RAM | 4GB | 8GB | This is the installed memory budget before purchasing upgrade modules. |
| M.2 storage slots | 0 | 2 | Plan SSD cache and storage pools separately from the SATA archive. |
| Processor | Intel N5095 | Intel N100 | Media engines, application architecture and concurrency depend on this platform. |
| Software and expansion route | TOS | UGOS Pro | Choose the applications and supported add-ons required for the job. |
| SATA bays with supported expansion | 4 | 2 | Expansion requires separately purchased compatible hardware and a supported pool layout. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose TerraMaster F4-425. F4-425 has four SATA bays. With four equal 12 TB disks, RAID 5 gives 36 TB before formatting compared with the DXP2800's 12 TB SATA mirror.
Choose UGREEN NASync DXP2800. DXP2800 has two M.2 positions alongside its two SATA bays. A supported SSD mirror can therefore leave both SATA positions free for hard drives.
What matters in practice
The F4-425 makes room for four SATA disks and RAID 5. The DXP2800 uses two SATA bays but adds two M.2 slots and 8GB memory for a compact application server.
The four-bay TerraMaster gives a 36TB RAID 5 example with four 12TB disks. The UGREEN two-drive mirror gives 12TB. A larger advertised raw maximum does not replace this protection calculation.
Both use a 2.5GbE link. If the workload is a nightly backup from a gigabit desktop, neither link-rate advantage exists. Choose according to drive count, applications and the desk space available.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
Only 8 of 32 models checked match every need here: “Start with four drives” and “Survive one drive failure”.
8 matching models from 32 checkedMatch countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “Start with four drives” and “Survive one drive failure”. A need with no documented match does not count.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| TerraMaster F4-425 |
|
|
|
| UGREEN NASync DXP2800 |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

You need four SATA drives for protected capacity
See price & reviews on Amazon
You want two M.2 slots in a compact server
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.