Head-to-head

TerraMaster F4-425 vs UGREEN NASync DXP2800: Four-disk RAID archive or two hard drives plus SSD apps

The short answer

The F4-425 makes room for four SATA disks and RAID 5. The DXP2800 uses two SATA bays but adds two M.2 slots and 8GB memory for a compact application server.

Before you choose

The reasoning and the trade-offs

Protected capacity with equal 12TB drives

F4-425 gives 36TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB before formatting in this example. The difference is 24TB before filesystem overhead.

What this is based on

Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.

Main trade-off

TerraMaster F4-425

The single network port tops out at 2.5GbE.

Main trade-off

UGREEN NASync DXP2800

Two SATA bays cap growth and rule out parity layouts.

TerraMaster F4-425

TerraMaster F4-425

Choose it for
  • You need four SATA drives for protected capacity
  • You want 4GB for supplied ram
Main trade-off
The single network port tops out at 2.5GbE.
See price & reviews on Amazon
UGREEN NASync DXP2800

UGREEN NASync DXP2800

Choose it for
  • You want two M.2 slots in a compact server
  • You want 8GB for supplied ram
Main trade-off
Two SATA bays cap growth and rule out parity layouts.
See price & reviews on Amazon

Analysis updated , Catalog updated , Amazon.com / United States

About this comparison

Compare F4-425 and DXP2800 by protected storage, included networking and the exact SSD or application layout you need.

Choose hard-drive growth or a smaller SSD-capable server.

Winner by situation

Start with what you need it to do

  • A protected archive using 12 TB disks in every internal SATA bay

    Using RAID 1 for two disks or RAID 5 for three or more disks, F4-425 gives 36TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB before formatting in this example. The difference is 24TB before filesystem overhead.

    TerraMaster F4-425
    Better fit
    UGREEN NASync DXP2800
    Good
  • A workstation already matching the faster included Ethernet port

    Included port rates are 2.5GbE and 2.5GbE. Use the 100GB calculation alongside the actual client speed.

    TerraMaster F4-425
    Similar
    UGREEN NASync DXP2800
    Similar
  • Several local services sharing the supplied RAM

    TerraMaster F4-425 supplies 4 GB RAM and supports 16 GB. UGREEN NASync DXP2800 supplies 8 GB and supports 16 GB. Compare the stated application memory requirement with the supplied configuration before budgeting for an upgrade. RAM capacity alone does not establish application speed.

    TerraMaster F4-425
    Depends
    UGREEN NASync DXP2800
    Better fit
  • The SSD requirement can consume the TerraMaster capacity advantage

    If two SATA bays in the F4-425 are allocated to SSDs, only two remain for HDDs. The DXP2800 can instead use its two M.2 slots for SSDs while preserving its two SATA bays, subject to the supported pool layout.

    TerraMaster F4-425
    Depends
    UGREEN NASync DXP2800
    Depends

What matters in practice

The differences that matter

Protected capacity with equal 12TB drives

F4-425 gives 36TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB before formatting in this example. The difference is 24TB before filesystem overhead.

How we reached this conclusion

Assume every SATA bay contains a supported 12TB disk. Two-bay RAID 1 uses one disk of usable capacity. For three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. This is an illustrative layout, not included storage or a backup.

100GB transfer at the included port ceiling

The line-rate lower bound is 320 seconds for F4-425 and 320 seconds for UGREEN NASync DXP2800. Real copies take longer. A 1GbE client makes the lower bound 800 seconds for both.

How we reached this conclusion

Decimal 100GB × 8 = 800 gigabits. Divide 800 by the fastest included port rate, 2.5Gbps or 2.5Gbps. Ignore protocol overhead only for this lower-bound calculation. Optional adapters and aggregated ports are excluded.

The SSD requirement can consume the TerraMaster capacity advantage

If two SATA bays in the F4-425 are allocated to SSDs, only two remain for HDDs. The DXP2800 can instead use its two M.2 slots for SSDs while preserving its two SATA bays, subject to the supported pool layout.

How we reached this conclusion

F4-425 has 4 SATA and 0 M.2 positions. Reserving 2 SATA for SSDs leaves 2 for HDDs. DXP2800 has 2 SATA plus 2 M.2. This is a device-placement calculation, not a performance estimate.

Choice A
TerraMaster F4-425

TerraMaster, F4-425

F4-425

Four SATA bays give a growing archive more RAID layout choices than a two-bay mirror. A single 2.5GbE port and 4GB memory keep the specification focused on file storage.

Best matched use
A growing family archive with four drives

Checked facts

  • 4 SATA drive bays and 0 M.2 slots
  • 2.5GbE fastest included network port
  • 4GB supplied RAM, expandable to 16GB
  • Diskless NAS with Intel N5095 processor
Choice B
UGREEN NASync DXP2800

UGREEN, DXP2800

UGREEN NASync DXP2800

The chassis has 2-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Best matched use
run Plex at home and transcode 4K video

Checked facts

  • The chassis has 2-bay storage.
  • Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.
  • Plex media serving is supported.

Meaningful differences

What changes the fit

Meaningful differences between TerraMaster F4-425 and UGREEN NASync DXP2800
What changesTerraMaster F4-425UGREEN NASync DXP2800Why it matters
SATA drive bays42This changes the disk layouts possible inside the main enclosure.
Supplied RAM4GB8GBThis is the installed memory budget before purchasing upgrade modules.
M.2 storage slots02Plan SSD cache and storage pools separately from the SATA archive.
ProcessorIntel N5095Intel N100Media engines, application architecture and concurrency depend on this platform.
Software and expansion routeTOSUGOS ProChoose the applications and supported add-ons required for the job.
SATA bays with supported expansion42Expansion requires separately purchased compatible hardware and a supported pool layout.

What you give up

Every choice has a cost

If you choose TerraMaster F4-425

  • No M.2 storage slots are listed and the diskless enclosure requires a separate drive budget.

If you choose UGREEN NASync DXP2800

  • One network port provides no second wired path.

Recommendation switch

The decision flips if...

You need four SATA drives for protected capacity

Choose TerraMaster F4-425. F4-425 has four SATA bays. With four equal 12 TB disks, RAID 5 gives 36 TB before formatting compared with the DXP2800's 12 TB SATA mirror.

You want two M.2 slots in a compact server

Choose UGREEN NASync DXP2800. DXP2800 has two M.2 positions alongside its two SATA bays. A supported SSD mirror can therefore leave both SATA positions free for hard drives.

What matters in practice

How to make the call

01

Start with the required storage layout

The F4-425 makes room for four SATA disks and RAID 5. The DXP2800 uses two SATA bays but adds two M.2 slots and 8GB memory for a compact application server.

02

Work through the drive budget

The four-bay TerraMaster gives a 36TB RAID 5 example with four 12TB disks. The UGREEN two-drive mirror gives 12TB. A larger advertised raw maximum does not replace this protection calculation.

03

Check the actual client and application plan

Both use a 2.5GbE link. If the workload is a nightly backup from a gigabit desktop, neither link-rate advantage exists. Choose according to drive count, applications and the desk space available.

Check these before buying

  • Confirm the selected diskless model and supplied RAM against the exact listing.
  • Check the manufacturer compatibility list for every drive and memory module.
  • Price a separate backup and the required client adapter or switch.

What this comparison cannot tell you

  • Capacity examples use equal 12TB drives before formatting, snapshots and filesystem overhead.
  • Ethernet calculations are lower bounds. Disk performance, network protocol and other traffic add time.
  • Memory capacity does not certify application speed or a VM count.

What the facts say

What the comparison shows

Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.

Compared set

Only 8 of 32 models checked match every need here: “Start with four drives” and “Survive one drive failure”.

8 matching models from 32 checked
See the checked facts and calculation notes
Compared set
32 models
Source records
4 for the products shown
Catalog updated

Match countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “Start with four drives” and “Survive one drive failure”. A need with no documented match does not count.

Facts and source records used for the products in this recommendation
ProductNeeds matchedChecked factsSource records
TerraMaster F4-425
  • Start with four drives
  • Survive one drive failure
  • 4 SATA drive bays and 0 M.2 slots
  • 2.5GbE fastest included network port
  • 4GB supplied RAM, expandable to 16GB
UGREEN NASync DXP2800
  • Survive one drive failure
  • The chassis has 2-bay storage.
  • Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.
  • Plex media serving is supported.

Ready to choose?

Check the price. Read the owner reviews.

Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Links open in a new tab.