Head-to-head

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6 vs Nimbustor 2 Gen2: Flashstor takes six SSDs, only Nimbustor keeps SATA drives

The short answer

Choose Flashstor 6 for an all-NVMe storage layout with six M.2 drives. Choose AS5402T when two SATA drives need to stay in the plan alongside up to four NVMe drives. Both use dual 2.5GbE ports, so six SSDs do not automatically make one computer transfer files faster.

Before you choose

The reasoning and the trade-offs

Your existing hard drives can decide the enclosure

AS5402T accepts two internal SATA drives. Flashstor 6 has no SATA bays.

What this is based on

The media formats differ even though each chassis lists six total drive positions.

Main trade-off

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

Existing SATA HDDs cannot go in this chassis.

Main trade-off

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

Only four positions accept NVMe drives.

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

Choose it for
  • Use six internal NVMe drives
  • Build an all-SSD drive layout
Main trade-off
Existing SATA HDDs cannot go in this chassis.
See price & reviews on Amazon
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

Choose it for
  • Reuse two compatible SATA drives
  • Combine HDD capacity with four NVMe positions
Main trade-off
Only four positions accept NVMe drives.
See price & reviews on Amazon

Analysis updated , Catalog updated , Amazon.com / United States

About this comparison

Compare Flashstor 6 and AS5402T for reusing hard drives, six NVMe positions and the same dual 2.5GbE networking.

Choose Flashstor 6 for an all-NVMe storage layout with six M.2 drives. Choose AS5402T when two SATA drives need to stay in the plan alongside up to four NVMe drives. Both use dual 2.5GbE ports, so six SSDs do not automatically make one computer transfer files faster.

Winner by situation

Start with what you need it to do

  • Reuse two internal SATA HDDs

    Flashstor has no SATA bays.

    ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
    Not suitable
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Better fit
  • Install six internal NVMe drives

    AS5402T has four M.2 slots.

    ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
    Better fit
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Not suitable
  • Use one built-in 2.5GbE connection

    Both provide the same per-port rating.

    ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
    Similar
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Similar
  • Require eight internal NVMe drives

    Flashstor 6 provides six slots and AS5402T provides four.

    ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
    Not suitable
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Not suitable

What matters in practice

The differences that matter

Your existing hard drives can decide the enclosure

AS5402T accepts two internal SATA drives. Flashstor 6 has no SATA bays.

How we reached this conclusion

The media formats differ even though each chassis lists six total drive positions.

Six NVMe drives support a different capacity plan

Flashstor provides two additional M.2 positions beyond AS5402T.

How we reached this conclusion

Six minus four equals two additional NVMe positions. This does not assign a RAID level or promise usable capacity.

An all-SSD box still meets the same network sockets

Both chassis have 2.5GbE per built-in port.

How we reached this conclusion

Drive media and network line rate are separate limits. Combining ports requires a supported complete setup.

Choice A
ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

ASUSTOR, FS6706T

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

The chassis has 6 primary M.2 NVMe storage slots. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Best matched use
Use six internal NVMe drives

Checked facts

  • SATA bays: None
  • M.2 NVMe slots: 6
  • Built-in Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • Installed RAM: 4 GB
Choice B
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

ASUSTOR, AS5402T

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

The chassis has 2-bay storage. Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Best matched use
Reuse two compatible SATA drives

Checked facts

  • SATA bays: 2
  • M.2 NVMe slots: 4
  • Built-in Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • Installed RAM: 4 GB

Meaningful differences

What changes the fit

Meaningful differences between ASUSTOR Flashstor 6 and ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
What changesASUSTOR Flashstor 6ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2Why it matters
SATA baysNone2Existing SATA HDDs need the Nimbustor chassis or separate external storage.
M.2 NVMe slots64The sixth drive position is an NVMe position only on Flashstor.
Built-in EthernetTwo 2.5GbE portsTwo 2.5GbE portsPer-port networking does not change with the drive media.
Installed RAM4 GB4 GBThe selected packages begin with the same RAM capacity.

What you give up

Every choice has a cost

If you choose ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

  • Six NVMe drives still share the available network interfaces.

If you choose ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

  • Both SATA bays fill immediately with two HDDs.

Recommendation switch

The decision flips if...

Six NVMe positions are required

Choose ASUSTOR Flashstor 6. Flashstor has six M.2 slots.

Two SATA HDDs need to remain internal

Choose ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2. AS5402T has two SATA bays.

I need a built-in 10GbE port

Choose neither. The six-slot Flashstor is dual 2.5GbE, unlike another model in its family.

What matters in practice

How to make the call

01

Your existing hard drives can decide the enclosure

If two compatible NAS HDDs already hold the archive, AS5402T can include them in a new layout with four NVMe positions. Flashstor needs an all-NVMe plan or separate storage for those HDDs. Reusing drives does not imply that an existing array can be inserted without migration, so verify data-transfer rules first.

02

Six NVMe drives support a different capacity plan

A planned six-drive NVMe array requires Flashstor among these two models. AS5402T can reach six physical drives by mixing two SATA and four NVMe positions, but that is a different media layout. Check whether the operating system supports the pools and redundancy you intend before calculating useful capacity.

03

An all-SSD box still meets the same network sockets

Choose Flashstor for the media layout rather than an assumption of faster single-cable access. AS5402T can use NVMe too, and both connect through the same per-port speed rating. For one workstation, verify its adapter and storage workload. There is no matched evidence here that one produces better editing performance or lower room noise.

Check these before buying

  • Check exact FS6706T identity rather than copying Flashstor 12 Pro specifications.
  • Plan data migration and keep a separate backup.

What this comparison cannot tell you

  • No comparative noise, transfer or editing benchmark was performed.

What the facts say

What the comparison shows

Useful conclusions from the current NAS devices comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.

See the checked facts and calculation notes
Compared set
2 models
Source records
4 for the products shown
Catalog updated
Facts and source records used for the products in this recommendation
ProductNeeds matchedChecked factsSource records
ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
  • Use six internal NVMe drives
  • Build an all-SSD drive layout
  • SATA bays: None
  • M.2 NVMe slots: 6
  • Built-in Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • Installed RAM: 4 GB
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
  • Reuse two compatible SATA drives
  • Combine HDD capacity with four NVMe positions
  • SATA bays: 2
  • M.2 NVMe slots: 4
  • Built-in Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • Installed RAM: 4 GB

Ready to choose?

Check the price. Read the owner reviews.

Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Links open in a new tab.