DYMO LetraTag 100T vs DYMO LetraTag 200B: 100T offers shared keyboard access, 200B copies text from a phone
The short answer
Choose LetraTag 100T for a shared QWERTY keyboard on a table. Choose 200B for copying and designing text on a supported phone. Both print on 12 mm LetraTag media and need manual cutting.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
An address book on your phone changes where typing happens
200B is useful when the text is already on the phone and can be prepared in the supported app. 100T suits names created at the labeler itself. The benefit comes from reducing device switching. We do not claim automatic import from every contacts app or spreadsheet.
What this is based on
Cross text origin with app input versus onboard keyboard. Import compatibility remains specific to the app.
Main trade-off
DYMO LetraTag 100T
It does not add a wider tape size over the 100H.
Main trade-off
DYMO LetraTag 200B
Bluetooth requires the supported app rather than the iPhone Print menu.
LetraTag 100T
DYMO LetraTag 100T
Choose it for
Several people want to type without an app. 100T supplies the QWERTY keyboard.
You usually make labels at a table. Its two-handed layout fits a desk routine.
Analysis updated , Catalog updated , Amazon.com / United States
About this comparison
DYMO LetraTag 100T vs 200B for desktop typing or labels from a phone. Compare family access, tape compatibility and the cutting step that stays manual.
Choose LetraTag 100T for a shared QWERTY keyboard on a table. Choose 200B for copying and designing text on a supported phone. Both print on 12 mm LetraTag media and need manual cutting.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
Several people want to type without an app
100T supplies the QWERTY keyboard.
DYMO LetraTag 100T
Good
DYMO LetraTag 200B
Depends
You usually make labels at a table
Its two-handed layout fits a desk routine.
DYMO LetraTag 100T
Good
DYMO LetraTag 200B
Depends
Names and notes already live on the phone
200B keeps label creation in the supported app.
DYMO LetraTag 100T
Depends
DYMO LetraTag 200B
Good
You want to store a smaller screenless device
The phone replaces the keyboard and display.
DYMO LetraTag 100T
Depends
DYMO LetraTag 200B
Good
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
01
An address book on your phone changes where typing happens
200B is useful when the text is already on the phone and can be prepared in the supported app. 100T suits names created at the labeler itself. The benefit comes from reducing device switching. We do not claim automatic import from every contacts app or spreadsheet.
How we reached this conclusion
Cross text origin with app input versus onboard keyboard. Import compatibility remains specific to the app.
02
Children or visiting relatives may need independent controls
100T can be used without borrowing a phone or setting up an app. That can matter in a shared craft area or family organization station. 200B has no keyboard of its own. The decision changes if the printer belongs to one person who always has a compatible phone nearby.
How we reached this conclusion
100T onboard input versus 200B phone-only control.
03
The upgrade does not improve the physical output envelope
Both take 12 mm LetraTag media and use a manual cutter. A larger-screen phone may make editing more convenient, but it cannot create a wider cassette or automate separation. If the frustration is tiny storage text or many repeated cuts, consider a different size or cutter class.
How we reached this conclusion
Equal maximum media width and manual cutters. Editing convenience is not a hardware width or cutting change.
Choice A
LetraTag 100T
DYMO, LetraTag 100T
LetraTag 100T
Use a wider QWERTY layout for repeated short names around the home.
Best matched use
Several people want to type without an app. 100T supplies the QWERTY keyboard.