Main trade-off
Hurom H320
The fine mesh strainer needs cleaning after the recipe.
Head-to-head
Hurom H320 vs H400: H320 changes pulp textures, H400 avoids a conventional fine mesh strainer
The short answer
Choose the H320 when different people want different pulp textures. Choose the H400 when avoiding a conventional fine mesh strainer is more important than swapping between two juice strainers.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
Shared texture preferences favor a swappable strainer
If one person dislikes pulp and another prefers more texture, H320 provides two documented juice strainers. You can select a different screen for the next recipe. H400 is the more relevant choice when scrubbing that screen is what stops you using a juicer regularly.
What this is based on
H320 includes fine and coarse strainers. H400 separates with a two-part auger and no conventional mesh strainer. No matched pulp-content test is claimed.
Main trade-off
Hurom H400
Removing a mesh strainer does not remove the need to clean the remaining food-contact parts.
Hurom H320
- Choose it for
- Your household wants both finer and coarser juice
- You want the documented 2 L ingredient hopper
- Main trade-off
- The fine mesh strainer needs cleaning after the recipe.
Hurom H400
- Choose it for
- Cleaning a fine mesh strainer is the sticking point
- You prefer the two-part mesh-free auger
- Main trade-off
- Removing a mesh strainer does not remove the need to clean the remaining food-contact parts.
About this comparison
Hurom H320 vs H400: compare separation system, chamber and the practical limits that change which juicer fits your daily routine.
Choose the H320 when different people want different pulp textures. Choose the H400 when avoiding a conventional fine mesh strainer is more important than swapping between two juice strainers.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
Two adults with different pulp preferences
H320 includes two juice-strainer choices.
- Hurom H320
- Better fit
- Hurom H400
- Depends
Fine mesh cleaning makes you skip juicing
H400 removes that specific part.
- Hurom H320
- Caution
- Hurom H400
- Better fit
18-inch fixed vertical space
Both assembled heights exceed it.
- Hurom H320
- Not suitable
- Hurom H400
- Not suitable
Looking for a longer rated session
Both list 30 minutes.
- Hurom H320
- Similar
- Hurom H400
- Similar
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
Shared texture preferences favor a swappable strainer
If one person dislikes pulp and another prefers more texture, H320 provides two documented juice strainers. You can select a different screen for the next recipe. H400 is the more relevant choice when scrubbing that screen is what stops you using a juicer regularly.
How we reached this conclusion
H320 includes fine and coarse strainers. H400 separates with a two-part auger and no conventional mesh strainer. No matched pulp-content test is claimed.
The chamber difference is only one tenth
H400 holds 50 mL more in the juicing chamber, a 10% increase. That is a weak reason to change models by itself. The separation parts are the stronger everyday difference for a household balancing texture preferences against cleanup.
How we reached this conclusion
(550 minus 500) divided by 500 = 10%. These are chamber capacities, not measured yield.
Cabinet clearance can veto either choice
A kitchen with 18 inches below the upper cabinets cannot accept either listed assembled height. Even a slightly taller space still needs room to open and remove the hopper. Plan to move the appliance forward if your layout allows that safely.
How we reached this conclusion
H320 is 18.2 inches high. H400 is 18.5 inches. Open-lid and disassembly clearance are additional and unmeasured here.
Choice A
Hurom, H320
H320
Choose the fine or coarse strainer for the result you want, then load the prepared recipe into the self-feeding hopper.
- Best matched use
- Your household wants both finer and coarser juice
Checked facts
- Separation system: Fine or coarse juice strainer
- Chamber: 500 mL
- Assembled height: 18.2 inches
- Continuous use: Up to 30 minutes
Choice B
Hurom, H400
H400
The two-part auger handles separation without a conventional fine mesh screen, which changes the parts you clean after juicing.
- Best matched use
- Cleaning a fine mesh strainer is the sticking point
Checked facts
- Separation system: Strainer-free two-part auger
- Chamber: 550 mL
- Assembled height: 18.5 inches
- Continuous use: Up to 30 minutes
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | Hurom H320 | Hurom H400 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Separation system | Fine or coarse juice strainer | Strainer-free two-part auger | H320 gives a deliberate strainer choice. H400 changes the cleaning task. |
| Chamber | 500 mL | 550 mL | The 50 mL difference is modest compared with the change in separation design. |
| Assembled height | 18.2 inches | 18.5 inches | Neither fits a 17-inch shelf. |
| Continuous use | Up to 30 minutes | Up to 30 minutes | A larger chamber does not mean a longer rated session. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose Hurom H320
- Hopper volume cannot tell you how many glasses a particular recipe will produce.
If you choose Hurom H400
- At 18.5 inches high, it needs a tall storage space and extra room to open.
Recommendation switch
The decision flips if...
Your household wants both finer and coarser juice
Choose Hurom H320. H320 supplies fine and coarse juice strainers, letting you change the screen for the next recipe.
Cleaning a fine mesh strainer is the sticking point
Choose Hurom H400. H400 replaces the conventional fine mesh screen with a two-part separation auger.
You need proof that one extracts more juice from your exact recipe
Choose neither. The specifications do not provide a matched recipe-and-yield test.
What matters in practice
Before you choose
What this comparison cannot tell you
- Recommendations use documented specifications and stated operating limits. We have not measured matched juice yield, noise, cleaning time or nutritional effects.
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current juicers comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
See the checked facts and calculation notes
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurom H320 |
|
|
|
| Hurom H400 |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Hurom H320
Your household wants both finer and coarser juice
See price & reviews on AmazonHurom H400
Cleaning a fine mesh strainer is the sticking point
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.