Main trade-off
BenQ X500i
Its published 4K/60 latency is higher and USB-C power is limited to 5W.
Head-to-head
Choose the X500i for a high-refresh PC or a short shelf that needs optical zoom. Choose the TK705STi for 60 Hz console games and straightforward Google TV streaming, if its fixed lens fits your screen. The newer model has lower manufacturer-listed lag at 4K/60. X500i is the bounded choice when its documented 1080p/240 mode is required, while higher-refresh support on TK705STi remains unconfirmed.
Before you choose
At seven feet, both lenses can frame a 120-inch 16:9 image. At six feet, only the X500i is close to that target. The TK705STi would make about 103 inches. Measure the lens position before treating them as interchangeable.
What this is based on
BenQ X500i: 120-inch distance from 0.69 to 0.83 throw = 6.01 to 7.23 feet. BenQ TK705STi: 0.8 throw gives 103.28 inches diagonal at six feet.
Main trade-off
Its published 4K/60 latency is higher and USB-C power is limited to 5W.
Main trade-off
It gives up optical zoom. Its higher-refresh support remains unconfirmed, while X500i positively documents 1080p/240.


BenQ X500i vs TK705STi for a small gaming room. See when optical zoom and 1080p/240 matter more than 4K/60 latency and built-in Google TV.
Winner by situation
The X500i documents this exact mode. Higher-refresh support on the TK705STi remains unconfirmed because manufacturer scan ranges conflict.
Both optical designs fit approximately this geometry. Leave clearance behind the chassis.
The X500i can get near 120 inches here. The STi produces a smaller image at the same position.
Built-in Google TV and lower claimed 4K/60 lag favor the STi when its fixed lens fits.
What matters in practice
At seven feet, both lenses can frame a 120-inch 16:9 image. At six feet, only the X500i is close to that target. The TK705STi would make about 103 inches. Measure the lens position before treating them as interchangeable.
BenQ X500i: 120-inch distance from 0.69 to 0.83 throw = 6.01 to 7.23 feet. BenQ TK705STi: 0.8 throw gives 103.28 inches diagonal at six feet.
The STi’s published 4K/60 lag is 11.7 ms lower. The X500i can accept a new 1080p frame every 4.17 ms at 240 Hz instead of every 16.67 ms at 60 Hz. These figures measure different stages, so adding them into a made-up overall response score would mislead.
BenQ X500i: 16.7 ms at 4K/60. At 240 Hz, one source-frame interval is 1000 / 240 = 4.17 ms. BenQ TK705STi: 5 ms at 4K/60. At 60 Hz, one source-frame interval is 1000 / 60 = 16.67 ms.
The STi has six times the listed USB-C power ceiling, useful for a compatible low-power source on a cluttered desk. Check the source device’s own power demand. A gaming laptop that needs 65W or more still keeps its charger.
BenQ X500i: USB-C DisplayPort and 5V/1A power, equivalent to 5W. BenQ TK705STi: USB-C DisplayPort and up to 30W. 30 / 5 = 6, without implying six times the charging speed.
Try your real numbers
The result checks hard limits only. Preferences stay out of the calculation.
For a 120-inch 16:9 picture, the manual-table lens range is about 6.01 to 7.23 ft. Your input is 9.50 ft. Optical fit only: use the 1.2x optical zoom, level square placement at the fixed image height, body/cable space, 50 cm wall clearance and free airflow. No optical lens shift. For image quality, BenQ recommends the manual’s non-gray table rows. Test the actual image before mounting. Digital correction adds no optical range.
No complete verified optical range is stored for this exact model.
Distance is measured from the lens to the screen. The calculation uses a 16:9 image and the verified optical throw range for each exact model.

BenQ, X500i
A short-throw 4LED gaming projector for putting a big image in front of a desk or sofa without using the full depth of the room.

BenQ, TK705STi
The short-lens TK705 puts Google TV and low-lag 4K gaming in a smaller room, provided the furniture can sit at its fixed throw distance.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | BenQ X500i | BenQ TK705STi | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 120-inch lens distance | About 6.0 to 7.2 ft | About 7.0 ft | Both work near seven feet. The X500i also reaches a larger image from closer in. |
| Optical adjustment | 0.69 to 0.83 throw, 1.2x zoom | Fixed 0.8 throw | The X500i tolerates more variation in the position of a small table or ceiling mount. |
| Gaming format | 4K/60 or up to 1080p/240 | 4K/60 documented, higher-refresh support unconfirmed | Choose for the exact input format. Conflicting TK705STi scan ranges do not establish a universal refresh ceiling. |
| Published 4K/60 lag | 16.7 ms | 5 ms | These are manufacturer figures, not an independent head-to-head result. |
| Streaming | Included QS02 Android TV device | Built-in Google TV | Both avoid buying a separate streamer for their supported apps. |
| USB-C power | 5V/1A, up to 5W | Up to 30W | The STi can supply more power to a compatible device, but 30W will not power every laptop under load. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose BenQ X500i. Its 1.2x zoom gives some movement around a short-throw position
Choose BenQ TK705STi. BenQ specifies 5 ms at 4K/60 compared with 16.7 ms
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current home projectors comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| BenQ X500i |
|
| |
| BenQ TK705STi |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

You play competitive PC games at 1080p/240
See price & reviews on Amazon
Your games run at 4K/60 and you want built-in streaming
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.