Main trade-off
Jura E4
The taller body needs overhead refill access. Body height alone does not establish a usable under-cabinet fit.
Head-to-head
Jura E4 vs ENA 4: E4 adds refill room with little extra counter area
The short answer
Choose E4 for several daily black coffees when the extra 2.3 cm of body height fits. E4 adds about 73% water capacity for about 3% more closed-body counter area. ENA 4 wins where its lower height or 0.9 cm narrower body solves a real space limit. Both avoid milk-system cleaning, but still need fresh water, tray care and room above for refilling.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
A shared coffee corner can gain capacity without growing much
Two people working from home may value refill headroom more than the smallest-looking machine. E4 holds 0.8 liters more water and 155 g more beans, while its rectangular body footprint is only about 3% larger. That is a useful trade if the same counter still works. ENA 4 becomes the better choice when the extra 2.3 cm of E4 height prevents opening or removing what you need. Neither published body outline includes the space for your hands, tank or hopper lid.
What this is based on
E4 area 28 × 44.4 = 1243.2 square cm. ENA 4 area 27.1 × 44.5 = 1205.95. Difference 3.09%. Tank increase(1.9 − 1.1)/1.1 = 72.7%. Hopper difference 280 − 125 = 155 g. Capacity does not predict drinks between refills because rinsing and recipes use water.
Main trade-off
Jura ENA 4
The 1.1-liter tank and 125 g hopper provide much less refill headroom, despite a similar footprint.
Jura E4
- Choose it for
- Two people want more water and beans available without giving up much counter area.
- Larger coffee doses or a separate hot-water outlet matter to your usual drinks.
- Main trade-off
- The taller body needs overhead refill access. Body height alone does not establish a usable under-cabinet fit.
Jura ENA 4
- Choose it for
- The 32.3 cm body height fits your working location better than E4’s 34.6 cm.
- One person mostly makes smaller coffees and the smaller supplies are enough.
- Main trade-off
- The 1.1-liter tank and 125 g hopper provide much less refill headroom, despite a similar footprint.
About this comparison
Jura E4 vs ENA 4 for two coffee drinkers, low cabinets and larger black coffees. Compare refill headroom, dose limits and the decaf workaround.
Both are coffee-only Jura automatics. The useful question is whether ENA 4’s smaller body saves enough working space to justify smaller supplies.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
Two daily drinkers with adequate height above the counter
E4 adds substantial supply capacity with a small footprint increase.
- Jura E4
- Better fit
- Jura ENA 4
- Caution
A low working location where extra height is the problem
ENA 4 is 2.3 cm lower. Still check refill access.
- Jura E4
- Caution
- Jura ENA 4
- Better fit
Regularly wanting more than a 10 g single-cycle dose
E4’s documented brew-unit range reaches 16 g.
- Jura E4
- Better fit
- Jura ENA 4
- Caution
Two different whole beans must stay ready every day
Both have one hopper. Their ground chutes are manual alternatives.
- Jura E4
- Not suitable
- Jura ENA 4
- Not suitable
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
A shared coffee corner can gain capacity without growing much
Two people working from home may value refill headroom more than the smallest-looking machine. E4 holds 0.8 liters more water and 155 g more beans, while its rectangular body footprint is only about 3% larger. That is a useful trade if the same counter still works. ENA 4 becomes the better choice when the extra 2.3 cm of E4 height prevents opening or removing what you need. Neither published body outline includes the space for your hands, tank or hopper lid.
How we reached this conclusion
E4 area 28 × 44.4 = 1243.2 square cm. ENA 4 area 27.1 × 44.5 = 1205.95. Difference 3.09%. Tank increase(1.9 − 1.1)/1.1 = 72.7%. Hopper difference 280 − 125 = 155 g. Capacity does not predict drinks between refills because rinsing and recipes use water.
A large mug and a small brew unit create two separate decisions
If you want a larger black coffee without simply adding more water to the same dose, E4 gives the recipe more dose headroom, up to 16 g versus 10 g. ENA 4 can make successive drinks, but that means another cycle and potentially a different recipe. Neither machine’s ordinary coffee spout is tall enough for every travel tumbler. Measure your actual cup, or plan to brew into a smaller cup and transfer. Extra tank capacity does not solve cup clearance.
How we reached this conclusion
Published maximum brew dose differs by 6 g. Coffee-spout maximum 111 mm for E4 and 105 mm for ENA 4. No fixed strength-to-grams calibration, extraction-quality advantage or timing improvement is assumed.
Occasional decaf works differently from an interrupted daily habit
Both can take preground decaf without changing the main beans. That is useful for an occasional evening cup. If you routinely dose the chute and then get pulled away by a call or a child, both manuals require brewing within about one minute. The cycle otherwise stops. E4 permits at most two level spoons and ENA 4 one, so do not reuse the same loading habit blindly. Neither gives two people independently selectable whole beans. Daily alternate-coffee use is a reason to examine a true two-grinder machine.
How we reached this conclusion
Ground-chute quantity limits and one-minute preparation window crossed with occasional versus interrupted daily use. No claim that decaf is caffeine-free or that shared internals eliminate carryover.
Choice A
Jura, 15466 Piano Black NAA
E4
Two people want more water and beans available without giving up much counter area.
- Best matched use
- Two people want more water and beans available without giving up much counter area.
Checked facts
- Water and beans: 1.9 L and 280 g
- Closed body: 28 × 44.4 cm footprint, 34.6 cm high
- Brew-unit range: 5 to 16 g
- Occasional alternate coffee: Ground chute, at most two level spoons
Choice B
Jura, 15519 Full Nordic White NAB
ENA 4
The 32.3 cm body height fits your working location better than E4’s 34.6 cm.
- Best matched use
- The 32.3 cm body height fits your working location better than E4’s 34.6 cm.
Checked facts
- Water and beans: 1.1 L and 125 g
- Closed body: 27.1 × 44.5 cm footprint, 32.3 cm high
- Brew-unit range: 6 to 10 g
- Occasional alternate coffee: Ground chute, at most one level spoon
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | Jura E4 | Jura ENA 4 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water and beans | 1.9 L and 280 g | 1.1 L and 125 g | E4 reserves more supply for a shared morning without a large footprint increase. |
| Closed body | 28 × 44.4 cm footprint, 34.6 cm high | 27.1 × 44.5 cm footprint, 32.3 cm high | Height is the larger space distinction. Access remains additional. |
| Brew-unit range | 5 to 16 g | 6 to 10 g | A larger possible dose can matter for a larger drink. It does not establish better taste. |
| Occasional alternate coffee | Ground chute, at most two level spoons | Ground chute, at most one level spoon | Both need hands-on dosing and a start within about one minute. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose Jura E4
- No milk frother. Occasional lattes need a separate device and its cleaning.
If you choose Jura ENA 4
- The alternate-coffee chute is manual and must be used promptly. It is not a second bean hopper.
Recommendation switch
The decision flips if...
Shared daily use makes supply headroom important
Choose Jura E4. E4 adds water and beans without much extra counter area.
Body height is the binding space constraint
Choose Jura ENA 4. ENA 4 is lower, provided access still works.
What matters in practice
Before you choose
You want a small coffee station, but repeated refills interrupt two people using it through the day.
What this comparison cannot tell you
- Capacities are nominal. No measured flavor, extraction, noise or service-life comparison. Both require daily care.
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current espresso machines comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
See the checked facts and calculation notes
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jura E4 |
|
| |
| Jura ENA 4 |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Jura E4
Two people want more water and beans available without giving up much counter area.
Larger coffee doses or a separate hot-water outlet matter to your usual drinks.
See price & reviews on AmazonJura ENA 4
The 32.3 cm body height fits your working location better than E4’s 34.6 cm.
One person mostly makes smaller coffees and the smaller supplies are enough.
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.