Main trade-off
Epson ES-400 II
No built-in wireless connection or computer-free USB memory scanning.
Head-to-head
Choose the ES-580W for 51- to 100-sheet packets, wireless access or direct USB memory saving. Choose the ES-400 II for shorter batches at one computer, since both share the same published 35 ppm scan rate.
Before you choose
The ES-580W can accept 80 ordinary sheets in its 100-sheet feeder. The ES-400 II's 50-sheet feeder needs two loads. That is useful when you want to start a folder before returning to another task.
What this is based on
The calculation assumes suitable uniform paper and excludes hand-fed special media.
Main trade-off
No built-in wireless connection or computer-free USB memory scanning.
Main trade-off
The rated 35 ppm is lower than the newer ES-590W's 45 ppm.


Compare a 50-sheet USB scanner with a 100-sheet touchscreen model. Large packets and computer-free USB saving matter more than speed here.
Choose the ES-580W for 51- to 100-sheet packets, wireless access or direct USB memory saving. Choose the ES-400 II for shorter batches at one computer, since both share the same published 35 ppm scan rate.
Winner by situation
Both hold the job and share the same rated scan speed.
The ES-580W avoids one feeder reload.
A supported USB memory destination can be used without the computer.
Neither has a flatbed.
What matters in practice
The ES-580W can accept 80 ordinary sheets in its 100-sheet feeder. The ES-400 II's 50-sheet feeder needs two loads. That is useful when you want to start a folder before returning to another task.
The calculation assumes suitable uniform paper and excludes hand-fed special media.
Both are rated at 35 ppm and 70 ipm for Letter scans at 300 dpi. A short 20-sheet packet fits either feeder. For that routine, the ES-580W earns its price through destinations and sharing rather than faster paper movement.
Finished job time varies with settings, host software and storage. No matched hands-on speed test is claimed.
The ES-580W can save directly to a supported memory drive without a computer. This is useful when the shared laptop is occupied, provided the drive and format fit Epson's requirements. The ES-400 II normally needs its connected host to receive the files.
Direct USB capture is separate from cloud upload. Cloud workflows may still require software, network access and an account.

Epson, ES-400 II
Turn a weekly pile of forms into files at one computer with a 50-sheet feeder.

Epson, ES-580W
Save a 100-sheet batch to a USB memory drive without waiting for the household computer.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | Epson ES-400 II | Epson ES-580W | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feeder | 50 sheets | 100 sheets | The ES-580W crosses an important packet-size threshold. |
| Connection | USB computer connection | USB and Wi-Fi | The larger model can be placed away from the receiving computer. |
| Controls | Buttons | 4.3-inch touchscreen | The screen provides on-device destination choices. |
| USB memory destination | No | Yes | Capture can happen before a computer is available. |
| 300 dpi scan rating | 35 ppm and 70 ipm | 35 ppm and 70 ipm | The upgrade is capacity and workflow, not rated feed speed. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose Epson ES-580W. The larger feeder directly removes a reload.
Choose Epson ES-400 II. The smaller model provides the same rated feed speed.
Choose neither. Use a flatbed or overhead scanner.
What matters in practice
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current document scanners comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epson ES-400 II |
|
| |
| Epson ES-580W |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

One computer receives all the files
See price & reviews on Amazon
You often scan folders with more than 50 sheets
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.