Main trade-off
CalDigit TS5
No fixed HDMI or DisplayPort socket. Only one USB-A socket is 10Gb/s, with a second USB 2.0 socket.
Head-to-head
TS5 gives three downstream Thunderbolt branches, while Anker puts the power supply inside the dock. Choose TS5 for two compatible USB-C screens plus a Thunderbolt drive, or a workflow that already uses UHS-II camera cards. Choose Anker when one screen uses HDMI or DisplayPort and a separate power brick is awkward to place. Anker’s HDMI and DisplayPort sockets cannot run together. A second display needs a compatible Thunderbolt route, and the host still controls the supported screen count.
Before you choose
Two USB-C monitors plus a Thunderbolt drive need three direct branches, which TS5 provides. Anker has two, so that exact layout leaves the drive without a direct dock port. Check the screens before ruling it out. If one also accepts HDMI or DisplayPort, Anker can send that screen through its single active fixed output and leave a TB port for the drive. This is useful for someone keeping a familiar work monitor while adding a second screen for photos or reference material. If both displays depend on USB-C, TS5 is simpler. Anker’s HDMI and DP sockets cannot be combined to free both TB ports for other devices.
What this is based on
Two display branches plus one TB-only drive need three. Anker provides two TB branches plus one active fixed video output. Alternative screen inputs and exact host display support are explicit conditions. No guaranteed SSD throughput.
Main trade-off
No fixed HDMI or DisplayPort socket. Only one USB-A socket is 10Gb/s, with a second USB 2.0 socket.
Main trade-off
HDMI and DisplayPort are alternative outputs, not simultaneous screen connections. Its card readers are UHS-I.


TS5 vs Anker A83B5 for two monitors, a Thunderbolt drive and a crowded desk. Compare the cable layout, USB-A accessories and camera-card workflow.
Both are current Thunderbolt 5 desk docks with 140W laptop charging and 2.5GbE. A buyer keeping the same screens and accessories can realistically consider either, but the port layout and power supply change the surrounding equipment.
Winner by situation
TS5 has three branches. Anker needs a different compatible route.
Anker integrates its supply. Keep ventilation clear and do not infer silence.
TS5 has UHS-II readers. Anker needs another reader to provide that interface.
Anker has three A sockets. TS5 has two.
What matters in practice
Two USB-C monitors plus a Thunderbolt drive need three direct branches, which TS5 provides. Anker has two, so that exact layout leaves the drive without a direct dock port. Check the screens before ruling it out. If one also accepts HDMI or DisplayPort, Anker can send that screen through its single active fixed output and leave a TB port for the drive. This is useful for someone keeping a familiar work monitor while adding a second screen for photos or reference material. If both displays depend on USB-C, TS5 is simpler. Anker’s HDMI and DP sockets cannot be combined to free both TB ports for other devices.
Two display branches plus one TB-only drive need three. Anker provides two TB branches plus one active fixed video output. Alternative screen inputs and exact host display support are explicit conditions. No guaranteed SSD throughput.
Anker integrates the supply, so there is no separate power brick to secure under a desk or move when cleaning around it. TS5 keeps its supplied adapter separate. For a desk that is regularly cleared for another activity, fewer separate pieces can make Anker easier to reset. For a permanent desk with a safe, ventilated place for the brick, that benefit may be small, and TS5’s port arrangement can matter more. Anker also uses a fan. We have no comparable noise measurement, so this is a cable-management conclusion rather than a quiet-room recommendation. Neither dock should be buried or have its ventilation obstructed just to hide the wiring.
Integrated versus external power architecture crossed with a desk that is frequently cleared. No measured reset time, temperature, acoustic or whole-system footprint claim. Ventilation remains a placement condition.
Someone importing weekend photos while leaving the desk’s screens and backup drive connected may expect either TB5 dock to speed up the whole job. Anker’s built-in card readers are UHS-I, while TS5’s are UHS-II. With a compatible UHS-II card that can exceed the slower interface, TS5 avoids adding an external UHS-II reader to recover that capability. With an older UHS-I card, the reader class alone is not a reason to choose TS5. Anker offers more direct USB-A sockets for other accessories, so the sensible choice depends on whether fast card imports or keeping existing plugs is the recurring inconvenience. No transfer-time reduction is promised without the actual card and destination drive.
Exact built-in reader classes crossed with the card-to-destination workflow. The slower compatible interface bounds the path. No invented card performance, file size or speed multiplier.

CalDigit, TBT5-TS5-US-AMZ
Two USB-C or Thunderbolt screens plus one TB drive need three direct branches, with a host that supports both displays.

Anker, A83B5
One monitor can use HDMI or DisplayPort directly, and removing an external power brick helps the actual desk layout.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | CalDigit TS5 | Anker Prime Thunderbolt 5 A83B5 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Downstream Thunderbolt | Three TB5 ports, up to 15W each | Two TB5 ports, up to 15W each | Screen connector choices decide how many branches remain for storage. |
| Fixed video connections | No fixed HDMI or DisplayPort | HDMI 2.1 or DisplayPort 2.1, one active fixed output | Anker can move one compatible screen off a TB branch, but cannot use both fixed outputs together. |
| Power supply | Separate 240W supply | Integrated supply, with AC cable | The easier arrangement depends on where the dock and power wiring can safely sit. |
| Older USB-A accessories | One 10Gb/s socket and one USB 2.0 socket | Three 10Gb/s sockets | Three A-shaped plugs fit Anker directly, even when the devices do not need high data rates. |
| Camera-card readers | UHS-II SD and microSD | UHS-I SD and microSD | A faster reader matters only with a compatible card and a transfer path that can use it. |
| Laptop power and network | Up to 140W and 2.5GbE | Up to 140W and 2.5GbE | These shared maxima do not decide the pair. Exact host and network support still matter. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose CalDigit TS5. TS5 fits that peripheral plan more directly.
Choose Anker Prime Thunderbolt 5 A83B5. Anker can preserve the screen route while removing a separate supply.
What matters in practice
You want a tidy one-cable desk without moving the clutter into adapters or losing the connection used by a screen or drive.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current docking stations comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| CalDigit TS5 |
|
| |
| Anker Prime Thunderbolt 5 A83B5 |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Two USB-C or Thunderbolt screens plus one TB drive need three direct branches, with a host that supports both displays.
You regularly import from compatible UHS-II camera cards and can accommodate the separate power adapter.
See price & reviews on Amazon
One monitor can use HDMI or DisplayPort directly, and removing an external power brick helps the actual desk layout.
Three USB-A accessories should stay connected without replacing their cables. Check that the remaining TB branches cover the screens and storage.
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.