Main trade-off
Yamaha DGX-670
The body is 445 mm deep before allowing for placement and accessories.
Head-to-head
Yamaha DGX-670 vs Korg XE20: Yamaha adds singing and score display, Korg eases frequent transport
The short answer
Choose the DGX-670 for singing, score display and multi-track recording. Choose the XE20 when the arranger piano must be carried often or connected to a separate speaker system.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
Rehearsal travel can matter more than the style count
XE20 is 11.4 kg and DGX-670 is 21.4 kg, a 10 kg difference in the listed instrument weights. Korg is also 109 mm shallower at 336 versus 445 mm. For an accompaniment piano moved between rooms or rehearsals, that combined load and depth change can be more useful than choosing between 263 and 280 styles.
What this is based on
DGX-670: Listed instrument weight 21.4 kg. XE20: Listed instrument weight 11.4 kg. DGX-670: Depth before music rest 445 mm. XE20: Depth before music rest 336 mm. DGX-670: Accompaniment styles 263. XE20: Accompaniment styles 280. Conditional workflow inference from these documented inputs. No matched performance measurement.
Main trade-off
Korg XE20
The 12-track allocation includes eight accompaniment parts. The manual supports user-song overdubbing, not twelve independent keyboard parts.
Yamaha DGX-670
- Choose it for
- You sing and follow a displayed score at home
- You want an arrangement with more than four keyboard parts
- Main trade-off
- The body is 445 mm deep before allowing for placement and accessories.
Korg XE20
- Choose it for
- You move the arranger piano regularly
- You connect the piano to external powered speakers
- Main trade-off
- The 12-track allocation includes eight accompaniment parts. The manual supports user-song overdubbing, not twelve independent keyboard parts.
About this comparison
Yamaha DGX-670 vs Korg XE20: compare listed instrument weight, depth before music rest, microphone input and the practice routines that change the better choice.
Both are weighted 88-key arranger pianos for people who play with automatic accompaniment. Yamaha's recording and singing tools compete with Korg's lighter body and dedicated outputs.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
You move the arranger piano regularly
XE20 is 11.4 kg and DGX-670 is 21.4 kg, a 10 kg difference in the listed instrument weights. Korg is also 109 mm shallower at 336 versus 445 mm. For an accompaniment piano moved between rooms or rehearsals, that combined load and depth change can be more useful than choosing between 263 and 280 styles.
- Yamaha DGX-670
- Good
- Korg XE20
- Better fit
You sing and follow a displayed score at home
DGX-670 provides a microphone input and a 4.3-inch score display. XE20 has no microphone input in its connector list. If singing and following a displayed score are part of the same session, Yamaha combines those tasks. A separate singer's system makes Korg's portability more attractive again.
- Yamaha DGX-670
- Better fit
- Korg XE20
- Caution
You want an arrangement with more than four keyboard parts
XE20's sequencer allocates four keyboard parts and eight accompaniment parts, and its manual supports overdubbing a user song. DGX-670 provides 16 recorder tracks. If you want more than four keyboard parts, Yamaha offers more room. For a simpler arrangement, Korg can still layer playing over a saved song. Do not read 12 total parts as 12 independent keyboard tracks.
- Yamaha DGX-670
- Better fit
- Korg XE20
- Caution
You connect the piano to external powered speakers
XE20 has dedicated L/R outputs. DGX-670 uses its shared headphone output for an analog output route.
- Yamaha DGX-670
- Good
- Korg XE20
- Better fit
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
Rehearsal travel can matter more than the style count
XE20 is 11.4 kg and DGX-670 is 21.4 kg, a 10 kg difference in the listed instrument weights. Korg is also 109 mm shallower at 336 versus 445 mm. For an accompaniment piano moved between rooms or rehearsals, that combined load and depth change can be more useful than choosing between 263 and 280 styles.
How we reached this conclusion
DGX-670: Listed instrument weight 21.4 kg. XE20: Listed instrument weight 11.4 kg. DGX-670: Depth before music rest 445 mm. XE20: Depth before music rest 336 mm. DGX-670: Accompaniment styles 263. XE20: Accompaniment styles 280. Conditional workflow inference from these documented inputs. No matched performance measurement.
A voice-and-piano session favors Yamaha's input and screen
DGX-670 provides a microphone input and a 4.3-inch score display. XE20 has no microphone input in its connector list. If singing and following a displayed score are part of the same session, Yamaha combines those tasks. A separate singer's system makes Korg's portability more attractive again.
How we reached this conclusion
DGX-670: Microphone input Yes. XE20: Microphone input No. DGX-670: screen 4.3-inch color score display. XE20: screen Not established in the checked record. Conditional workflow inference from these documented inputs. No matched performance measurement.
Overdubbing is available on both, with different allocations
XE20's sequencer allocates four keyboard parts and eight accompaniment parts, and its manual supports overdubbing a user song. DGX-670 provides 16 recorder tracks. If you want more than four keyboard parts, Yamaha offers more room. For a simpler arrangement, Korg can still layer playing over a saved song. Do not read 12 total parts as 12 independent keyboard tracks.
How we reached this conclusion
Korg manual pages 21 and 24: four keyboard parts plus eight accompaniment parts, user-song overdubbing supported. Yamaha specification:16 recorder tracks. These allocations support a conditional arrangement-size comparison.
Choice A
Yamaha, DGX-670
DGX-670
The DGX-670 puts a score display, microphone input and 16-track recorder in one weighted piano. It makes sense when your routine includes arranging and singing, with a permanent spot for its deeper body.
- Best matched use
- You sing and follow a displayed score at home
Checked facts
- Listed instrument weight: 21.4 kg
- Depth before music rest: 445 mm
- Microphone input: Yes
- Dedicated line outputs: No
Choice B
Korg, XE20
XE20
The XE20 combines weighted keys and 280 accompaniment styles in an 11.4 kg body. Dedicated line outputs help when the same piano is used with a separate speaker system.
- Best matched use
- You move the arranger piano regularly
Checked facts
- Listed instrument weight: 11.4 kg
- Depth before music rest: 336 mm
- Microphone input: No
- Dedicated line outputs: Yes
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | Yamaha DGX-670 | Korg XE20 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed instrument weight | 21.4 kg | 11.4 kg | Plan the moving load using the stated measurement basis, then add the stand, case and accessories. |
| Depth before music rest | 445 mm | 336 mm | Bare depth excludes the music rest, cable route and comfortable playing clearance. |
| Microphone input | Yes | No | A singing setup needs a documented input and compatible microphone before vocal effects matter. |
| Dedicated line outputs | No | Yes | Dedicated outputs keep an external amplification route separate from the headphone sockets. |
| Internal recorder tracks | 16 | 12 total parts, including 4 keyboard and 8 accompaniment parts | Both support layered recording. Compare the keyboard-part allocation rather than treating all 12 Korg parts as independent keyboard tracks. |
| Accompaniment styles | 263 | 280 | Accompaniment patterns matter for arranging and play-along sessions, not every piano lesson. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose Yamaha DGX-670
- One headphone socket and no dedicated line outputs deserve a setup check.
If you choose Korg XE20
- Half-pedaling with optional pedals is limited to specified piano voices.
Recommendation switch
The decision flips if...
You sing and follow a displayed score at home
Choose Yamaha DGX-670. DGX-670 provides a microphone input and a 4.3-inch score display. XE20 has no microphone input in its connector list. If singing and following a displayed score are part of the same session, Yamaha combines those tasks. A separate singer's system makes Korg's portability more attractive again.
You move the arranger piano regularly
Choose Korg XE20. XE20 is 11.4 kg and DGX-670 is 21.4 kg, a 10 kg difference in the listed instrument weights. Korg is also 109 mm shallower at 336 versus 445 mm. For an accompaniment piano moved between rooms or rehearsals, that combined load and depth change can be more useful than choosing between 263 and 280 styles.
You require a verified winner for mechanical key noise or personal playing comfort
Choose neither. The manufacturer records do not provide a matched test for those outcomes. Try the instruments in your intended conditions.
What matters in practice
Before you choose
What this comparison cannot tell you
- The comparison uses documented specifications and conditional setup reasoning. We have not measured key feel, mechanical noise or speaker performance side by side.
- Dimensions describe the specified body or cabinet. Leave room for the rest, cables, bench and player.
- Check the exact Amazon model, color, supplied accessories, condition and delivery date before ordering.
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current digital pianos comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
See the checked facts and calculation notes
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yamaha DGX-670 |
|
|
|
| Korg XE20 |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Yamaha DGX-670
You sing and follow a displayed score at home
See price & reviews on AmazonKorg XE20
You move the arranger piano regularly
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.