Main trade-off
Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
Its 1.7-gallon bucket needs more frequent emptying than a Midea Cube.
Head-to-head
Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi vs 35 Pint Wi-Fi: 35 removes more per rated day, both share a 1.7-gallon bucket
The short answer
Choose the 35-pint Frigidaire for a higher moisture load and better standardized efficiency per liter removed. Choose the 22-pint model when a smaller-capacity unit is sufficient. Both have a 1.7-gallon bucket and Wi-Fi, so the larger rating buys extraction headroom rather than a bigger water reservoir.
Before you choose
The reasoning and the trade-offs
About 59% more standardized removal capacity
The 35-pint model adds 13.28 certified pints per day.
What this is based on
(35.85 −22.57) ÷22.57 ×100 =58.8%.
Main trade-off
Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
It cannot pump water uphill.
Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Choose it for
- A smaller moisture load does not require 35-pint capacity
- You want the same basic app and bucket routine
- Main trade-off
- Its 1.7-gallon bucket needs more frequent emptying than a Midea Cube.
Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Choose it for
- You need more standardized removal capacity
- You want better energy efficiency per liter in the certification figures
- Main trade-off
- It cannot pump water uphill.
About this comparison
Compare Frigidaire's 22- and 35-pint Wi-Fi dehumidifiers by standardized extraction, energy per liter and the shared bucket that still needs emptying.
Winner by situation
Start with what you need it to do
Smaller manageable moisture load
A sufficient 22-pint unit need notbe replaced solely for a larger name.
- Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Better fit
- Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Good
Higher recurring moisture load
The 35 has materially more standardized capacity.
- Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Good
- Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Better fit
Compare energy per liter removed
Its 2.01 L/kWh figure exceeds 1.70 at the certification conditions.
- Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Good
- Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Better fit
Want a larger bucket by upgrading
Both retain a 1.7-gallon reservoir.
- Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Similar
- Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- Similar
What matters in practice
The differences that matter
About 59% more standardized removal capacity
The 35-pint model adds 13.28 certified pints per day.
How we reached this conclusion
(35.85 −22.57) ÷22.57 ×100 =58.8%.
The same bucket can fill sooner on the larger unit
At certified rates, the nominal times are 14.5 versus 9.1 hours.
How we reached this conclusion
1.7 ×8 =13.6 US pints.13.6 ÷22.57 ×24 =14.5 hours, and 13.6 ÷35.85 ×24 =9.1. Constant test-rate assumption.
Equal-water energy use is about 15% lower in the test figures
Removing 10 liters takes about 5.88 versus 4.98 kWh at the listed efficiencies.
How we reached this conclusion
10 ÷1.70 =5.88 and 10 ÷2.01 =4.98 kWh. The reduction is 15.4%, not an annual-bill forecast.
Choice A
Frigidaire, FHDD2234W1
22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
A straightforward small-room model with Wi-Fi, a washable filter and a familiar upright layout.
- Best matched use
- Bedrooms, offices and smaller finished spaces that need remote checks
Checked facts
- Frigidaire rates it at 22 pints per day and up to 1,500 square feet.
- The front bucket holds 1.7 gallons.
- The unit supports Wi-Fi control, continuous drainage and a washable filter.
Choice B
Frigidaire, FHDD3534Y1
35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
A quiet current 35-pint model with efficient performance, three fan speeds and useful app control.
- Best matched use
- Medium rooms where low noise and verified efficiency carry equal weight
Checked facts
- ENERGY STAR lists 35.85 pints per day and 2.01 L/kWh.
- Frigidaire specifies 48 dBA and up to 159 CFM.
- It offers three fan speeds, Wi-Fi control and operation down to 41°F.
Meaningful differences
What changes the fit
| What changes | Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier | Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Named capacity | 22 pints per day | 35 pints per day | The 35 class offers greater extraction headroom. |
| Certified capacity | 22.57 pints per day | 35.85 pints per day | These are standardized model-specific figures. |
| Certified efficiency | 1.70 L/kWh | 2.01 L/kWh | The 35 removes more water per unit of energy under the test. |
| Bucket | 1.7 US gallons | 1.7 US gallons | More removal capacity does not bring a bigger reservoir. |
| Drain andapp | Gravity drainage and Wi-Fi | Gravity drainage and Wi-Fi | An elevated drain still needs a separate solution. |
What you give up
Every choice has a cost
If you choose Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- The 22-pint capacity is intended for smaller moisture loads.
If you choose Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
- The conventional bucket is smaller than the Cube 35 reservoir.
What matters in practice
How to make the call
The certified gap is larger than the small name change
The current records list 22.57 and 35.85 pints per day for these exact model numbers. That is about 59% more standardized water-removal capacity for the 35-pint version. It supports choosing the larger unit for a harder moisture load, but not a promise that your particular room dries 59% faster. Infiltration, temperature and the humidity target change real use.
Equal bucket size changes the emptying story
Both cabinets use a 1.7-US-gallon bucket, about 13.6 pints. If they were continuously collecting at their respective certification rates, the nominal bucket would fill in about 14.5 hours for the 22 and 9.1 hours for the 35. Those are arithmetic examples, not expected schedules. A faster-removing unit can require more bucket trips precisely because it is collecting more water.
Efficiency is about water removed, not just watts
The certification figures are 1.70 and 2.01 liters per kilowatt-hour. For the same hypothetical 10 liters removed at those efficiencies, the calculation is about 5.88 versus 4.98 kWh. The 35-pint unit uses about 15% less energy per equal water volume in that comparison. Annual bills still depend on moisture demand, cycling and your electricity rate.
What this comparison cannot tell you
- Bucket-time calculations use continuous certified removal, which is not a household forecast.
- Certification efficiency is not a guarantee of actual annual energy consumption.
What the facts say
What the comparison shows
Useful conclusions from the current dehumidifiers comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
Compared set
Only 3 of 31 models checked match every need here: “I am drying a medium room or finished basement”, “It will run often, so efficiency matters”, and “I want to check humidity from my phone”.
3 matching models from 31 checkedSee the checked facts and calculation notes
Match countThe count uses the current product-to-need assignments for “I am drying a medium room or finished basement”, “It will run often, so efficiency matters”, and “I want to check humidity from my phone”. A need with no documented match does not count.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier |
|
| |
| Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Check the price. Read the owner reviews.
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
A smaller moisture load does not require 35-pint capacity
See price & reviews on AmazonFrigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
You need more standardized removal capacity
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.