Main trade-off
Typhur Fast Nugget Ice Maker Wi-Fi
Its body is 0.79 inch wider than Silonn's.
Head-to-head
Choose Typhur CM03P for app scheduling and a shorter body. Choose Silonn SLIM24T for a narrower body, simple front control and a removable top for manual cleaning access. Their first-ice claims are both about six minutes, and the daily output gap is only two pounds.
Before you choose
Do not buy Typhur solely expecting a large throughput jump. App control is the stronger documented reason to choose it.
What this is based on
(35 - 33) / 33 × 100 = 6.1%, rounded. The ratings use manufacturer conditions and describe production over a day, not ice held in the basket.
Main trade-off
Its body is 0.79 inch wider than Silonn's.
Main trade-off
App scheduling is not documented.


Compare Typhur CM03P and Silonn SLIM24T for app scheduling, removable cleaning access, body dimensions and what their daily nugget-ice ratings mean.
Choose Typhur CM03P for app scheduling and a shorter body. Choose Silonn SLIM24T for a narrower body, simple front control and a removable top for manual cleaning access. Their first-ice claims are both about six minutes, and the daily output gap is only two pounds.
Winner by situation
Typhur documents app scheduling. Remote scheduling is not documented for SLIM24T.
Silonn lists 8.9 inches wide versus Typhur's 9.69 inches. Add required clearance before deciding fit.
Typhur lists 12.09 inches high versus 12.91 inches. Leave access for filling and cleaning.
Silonn explicitly documents that access. Check the Typhur instructions before assuming an equivalent opening.
Both publish an approximately six-minute first-ice claim.
What matters in practice
Do not buy Typhur solely expecting a large throughput jump. App control is the stronger documented reason to choose it.
(35 - 33) / 33 × 100 = 6.1%, rounded. The ratings use manufacturer conditions and describe production over a day, not ice held in the basket.
Typhur saves 0.82 inch in body height. Silonn saves 0.79 inch in body width. Measure the dimension that is actually constrained.
12.91 - 12.09 = 0.82 inch. 9.69 - 8.9 = 0.79 inch. Ventilation, filling and ice access need additional room.
Both list about six minutes to first ice. The specifications cannot support a claim that one starts serving drinks sooner.
The two manufacturers publish the same approximate first-ice time. Water temperature, room conditions and batch size have not been tested side by side.
Silonn explicitly lets you remove the top for manual work. Typhur quantifies its automatic cycle, which still does not establish that manual descaling disappears.
Silonn documents a detachable top and self-cleaning. Typhur lists a seven-minute automatic cleaning cycle. Neither feature is treated as proof of maintenance-free operation.

Typhur, CM03P
A compact Wi-Fi nugget machine with a carry handle, app scheduling and a seven-minute pump-driven cleaning cycle.

Silonn, SLIM24T-US
A direct, compact 33-pound nugget machine with one-button operation and a removable top for cleaning access.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | Typhur Fast Nugget Ice Maker Wi-Fi | Silonn Countertop Nugget Ice Maker | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advertised daily production | Up to 35 lb | Up to 33 lb | The small rating difference is not a guarantee of different real-world output. |
| First-ice claim | About 6 minutes | About 6 minutes | Neither has a published first-batch timing advantage on these figures. |
| Remote control | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi with app scheduling | No app control documented | Typhur is the supported choice when scheduling remotely is essential. |
| Body height | 12.09 inches | 12.91 inches | Typhur is 0.82 inch shorter before operating clearance is considered. |
| Body width | 9.69 inches | 8.9 inches | Silonn is 0.79 inch narrower, which can matter more than height at some counters. |
| Cleaning provision | Seven-minute automatic cleaning cycle | Self-cleaning cycle and removable top | A timed cycle and physical cleaning access are different ownership features. |
What you give up
Recommendation switch
Choose Typhur Fast Nugget Ice Maker Wi-Fi. Typhur documents it.
Choose Silonn Countertop Nugget Ice Maker. Silonn explicitly lists that feature.
Choose neither. A two-pound rating gap is small and has not been measured under common conditions.
What matters in practice
Typhur's app can schedule or start ice making, which is useful when production should begin before a regular drink break. Silonn concentrates on a front control and status indicators. A buyer who never wants an app may prefer that routine even though Typhur has the slightly higher daily rating.
The shorter Typhur is also wider than Silonn. A shelf-height constraint and a narrow counter slot therefore lead in different directions. The body dimensions alone cannot establish safe installation. Allow the manual's ventilation space and room to fill, collect ice, drain and clean the machine.
A daily pound rating does not mean the basket stores that amount. Ice must be collected and water replenished as required. Both advertise self-cleaning, but mineral deposits and accessible surfaces still need the care described in the manual. Choose Silonn for its documented removable top if direct cleaning access is especially important.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current countertop ice makers comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typhur Fast Nugget Ice Maker Wi-Fi |
|
|
|
| Silonn Countertop Nugget Ice Maker |
|
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

You want to schedule ice making through an app
See price & reviews on Amazon
You prefer one-click front control
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.