Main trade-off
Dell 27 Plus 4K Monitor
This is the S2725QS without USB-C video, not the similarly named S2725QC.
Head-to-head
Choose S2725QS for sharper 4K desktop text and detailed games. LG 27GR83Q suits fast competitive games where a capable PC can use 240Hz at QHD.
Before you choose
S2725QS works out to about 163.2 pixels per inch, versus 108.8 for 27GR83Q-B. A denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while comfortable scaling determines workspace.
What this is based on
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 27 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
Main trade-off
This is the S2725QS without USB-C video, not the similarly named S2725QC.
Main trade-off
A 240Hz setting does not make games render at 240 frames per second.


Choose S2725QS for sharper 4K desktop text and detailed games. LG 27GR83Q suits fast competitive games where a capable PC can use 240Hz at QHD.
The Dell asks the GPU to shade more pixels
Winner by situation
S2725QS supplies 3840 × 2160 pixels against LG's 2560 × 1440. At the same 27-inch diagonal, Dell has the denser native image.
27GR83Q offers 240 Hz at QHD, compared with Dell at 120 Hz in 4K. The game and PC must deliver enough frames to benefit from that ceiling.
S2725QS combines 4K resolution with a 120 Hz limit. LG offers a higher refresh ceiling but cannot provide a native 4K image.
LG's 240 Hz mode provides twice the refresh opportunities of Dell's 120 Hz ceiling. Actual motion also depends on game frame delivery and pixel response.
What matters in practice
S2725QS works out to about 163.2 pixels per inch, versus 108.8 for 27GR83Q-B. A denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while comfortable scaling determines workspace.
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 27 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
S2725QS draws 8.3 million native pixels per frame and 27GR83Q-B 3.7 million. Their refresh ceilings are 120Hz and 240Hz respectively.
Native pixels = width × height. Refresh interval =1000 / Hz, giving 8.3 and 4.2 ms. These are signal and cadence calculations, not measured frame rates, input lag or pixel response.
Dell uses 125% more native pixels, while LG offers twice the refresh ceiling.
3840 × 2160 / (2560 × 1440) = 2.25. 240 / 120 = 2. Neither ratio predicts measured game performance.

Dell, S2725QS
A 27-inch 4K screen with 120Hz refresh is a useful middle ground for sharp text, spreadsheets and relaxed gaming. Choose it for a desktop or a laptop that already has a dock.

LG, 27GR83Q-B
A 240Hz IPS monitor keeps the familiar 27-inch QHD layout while giving high-frame-rate games more room to run. HDMI 2.1 makes the input specification worth checking against your graphics card.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | Dell 27 Plus 4K Monitor | LG UltraGear 27-inch QHD 240Hz | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 2560 × 1440 | Operating-system scaling changes usable logical workspace. |
| Panel diagonal | 27 in | 27 in | A nominal screen class may differ slightly from the measured active diagonal. |
| Maximum refresh | 120Hz | 240Hz | Check the exact input, resolution and overclock conditions. |
| Panel technology | IPS | IPS | Panel type alone does not establish a measured color or motion winner. |
| Laptop power | No USB-C laptop charging | No USB-C laptop charging | Host, cable and negotiated power profile must support the desired delivery. |
| Chassis width | Check exact drawing | Check exact drawing | Allow additional room for cables, arms and neighboring equipment. |
| Stand depth | Check exact drawing | Check exact drawing | The included stand can take more desk depth than the display cabinet. |
What you give up
What matters in practice
4K has 2.25 times the QHD pixel count. That is a workload comparison, not a guarantee that frame rate falls by the same factor.
240Hz can present a new refresh every 4.17 ms, while 120Hz gives 8.33 ms. Game frame time, response behavior and input latency still affect the result.
Both lack USB-C video and charging in these records. Add the required display cable and separate charging plan for a laptop.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current computer monitors comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
All 50 models remain in view on this guide. The answer comes from the facts and trade-offs shown on the page.
50 matching models from 50 checkedLG UltraGear 27-inch QHD 240Hz lists 240 Hz for maximum refresh rate, 100% above Dell 27 Plus 4K Monitor at 120 Hz.
Match countNo matcher need is preselected here. Open the matcher to add the needs that apply to your home, room or setup.
Calculation noteThis uses the highest published refresh mode. Resolution, connection and color settings can limit when that rate is available. 44 of 50 models have comparable published figures for context.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell 27 Plus 4K Monitor | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
| LG UltraGear 27-inch QHD 240Hz | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Read fine text and view 4K detail
See price & reviews on Amazon
Prioritize fast QHD gaming
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.