Main trade-off
ASUS TUF Gaming 27-inch QHD
The 165Hz maximum is an overclock setting through DisplayPort.
Head-to-head
Choose 27GP850 for its higher optional overclock ceiling. VG27AQ suits a QHD gaming setup where its 165Hz mode and familiar TUF controls are enough.
Before you choose
VG27AQ works out to about 108.8 pixels per inch, versus 108.8 for 27GP850-B. Their pixel densities are close enough that layout and connection needs are stronger separators.
What this is based on
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
Main trade-off
The 165Hz maximum is an overclock setting through DisplayPort.
Main trade-off
The 180Hz mode is an overclock, not the native refresh rate.


Choose 27GP850 for its higher optional overclock ceiling. VG27AQ suits a QHD gaming setup where its 165Hz mode and familiar TUF controls are enough.
The normal comparison is close
Winner by situation
VG27AQ supports QHD gaming up to its 165 Hz ceiling through the appropriate connection. The LG has the same native resolution, so neither changes pixel workload.
27GP850 offers an optional 180 Hz mode above its 165 Hz standard figure. Confirm the required connection and mode stability before relying on the overclock.
VG27AQ provides the TUF stand and control arrangement, with a listed 620 mm chassis width and 211 mm stand depth. Check the full position and adjustment range for the desk.
27GP850 uses the Nano IPS panel package. Its optional 180 Hz mode is a separate choice from its native 2560 × 1440 pixel count.
What matters in practice
VG27AQ works out to about 108.8 pixels per inch, versus 108.8 for 27GP850-B. Their pixel densities are close enough that layout and connection needs are stronger separators.
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Inputs are 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Published nominal diagonals make these approximate.
VG27AQ draws 3.7 million native pixels per frame and 27GP850-B 3.7 million. Their refresh ceilings are 165Hz and 165Hz respectively.
Native pixels = width × height. Refresh interval =1000 / Hz, giving 6.1 and 6.1 ms. These are signal and cadence calculations, not measured frame rates, input lag or pixel response.
180Hz refreshes every 5.56 ms versus 6.06 ms at 165Hz.
1000 / 165 - 1000 / 180 = 0.505 ms. Refresh cadence is not measured input lag.

ASUS, VG27AQ
A 27-inch QHD IPS screen with up to 165Hz covers familiar PC gaming needs. The flexible stand makes more practical difference than chasing a few extra hertz on a closely related model.

LG, 27GP850-B
A familiar 1440p gaming size with a 165Hz native refresh rate and a 180Hz overclock option. It suits players who also leave documents and desktop apps open all day.
Meaningful differences
| What changes | ASUS TUF Gaming 27-inch QHD | LG UltraGear 27-inch Nano IPS | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1440 | Operating-system scaling changes usable logical workspace. |
| Panel diagonal | 27 in | 27 in | A nominal screen class may differ slightly from the measured active diagonal. |
| Maximum refresh | 165Hz / 165Hz optional mode | 165Hz / 180Hz optional mode | Check the exact input, resolution and overclock conditions. |
| Panel technology | IPS | Nano IPS | Panel type alone does not establish a measured color or motion winner. |
| Laptop power | No USB-C laptop charging | No USB-C laptop charging | Host, cable and negotiated power profile must support the desired delivery. |
| Chassis width | 620 mm | Check exact drawing | Allow additional room for cables, arms and neighboring equipment. |
| Stand depth | 211 mm | Check exact drawing | The included stand can take more desk depth than the display cabinet. |
What you give up
What matters in practice
Both are 27-inch QHD IPS-family monitors. Their native pixel workload and approximate density are equal, so neither delivers a resolution upgrade.
LG lists 165Hz with an optional 180Hz mode. ASUS lists up to 165Hz with a lower HDMI limit. Confirm the connection and stability at the selected timing.
The jump from 165 to 180Hz changes the theoretical refresh interval by about half a millisecond. Stand fit, motion tuning and the final price can matter more.
What the facts say
Useful conclusions from the current computer monitors comparison, followed by the checked facts used to reach them.
All 50 models remain in view on this guide. The answer comes from the facts and trade-offs shown on the page.
50 matching models from 50 checkedLG UltraGear 27-inch Nano IPS lists 180 Hz for maximum refresh rate, 9% above ASUS TUF Gaming 27-inch QHD at 165 Hz.
Match countNo matcher need is preselected here. Open the matcher to add the needs that apply to your home, room or setup.
Calculation noteThis uses the highest published refresh mode. Resolution, connection and color settings can limit when that rate is available. 44 of 50 models have comparable published figures for context.
| Product | Needs matched | Checked facts | Source records |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS TUF Gaming 27-inch QHD | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
| LG UltraGear 27-inch Nano IPS | No positive match recorded for these needs |
|
|
Ready to choose?
Open either model on Amazon to check the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Use QHD gaming within 165Hz
See price & reviews on Amazon
Want the optional 180Hz mode
See price & reviews on AmazonLinks open in a new tab.